Opti's Entries
Created | Updated Apr 3, 2010
I have written for the Guide for a number of years. At first it was a bit hit and miss but slowly I found my niche in writing biographies. My main focus has centred around the celebrities mentioned in Madonna's song 'Vogue'. Many of these have now been completed, but there is one still outstanding: Gene Kelly. So for now I present to you My Solo Edited Entries.
Coming Up
By Golly it's the history of Golliwogs
In Peer Review
Tove Jansson - Illustrator and Author
Solo Edited Entries
60 Michael Morpurgo - Children's Author
59 Joseph Merrick - 'The Elephant Man'
53 Kurt Donald Cobain - Musician and Songwriter
52 Bette Davis - The First Lady of the American Screen
51 Marie Curie - Nobel Prize Winning Scientist
49 Dame Kelly Holmes - British Athlete and Coach
48 Rita Hayworth - Silver Screen Dancer and Actress
47 Constellation: Microscopium the Microscope
46 Ginger Rogers - Silver Screen Dancer, Actress and Singer
44 Colin Jackson CBE - British Athlete and Broadcaster
42 The Headington Shark, Oxfordshire, UK
41 Al Capone - American Gangster
39 Korky Paul – Children’s Illustrator
38 Jean Harlow - Silver Screen Siren
37 Michael Aspel - British Television Presenter
36 Floella Benjamin - Activist, Actress and Producer
35 Richard Hammond - British Broadcaster and Motoring Enthusiast
33 Maria von Trapp - From Fact to Fiction
30 Ant and Dec - British Television Presenters
29 Benjamin Zephaniah - Poet, novelist, playwright and activist
28 Princess Grace of Monaco aka Grace Kelly
27 Jason Donovan - Actor and Singer
26 Bill Oddie OBE - Comedian and Naturalist
25 Helen Keller
24 Michael Parkinson - Journalist and Broadcaster
20 Dame Anita Roddick - Founder of The Body Shop
18 Mary Seacole - Pioneering Nurse
17 Oprah Winfrey - Talk Show Host and Philanthropist
15 Richard Curtis - Screenwriter
11 Sir David Attenborough - Naturalist
10 Boudicca
9 Dawn French - Comedienne and Actress
6 Lemons
My Piccies
I am also a happy little snapper.
Word PlayScrabble | PegsWashing Lines+Clothes Pegs | Cool eye protectionSunglasses | Anyone for a game?Lawn Tennis | Strange weatherThe Headington Shark |
Opti's Post Features
Date | Subject | |
02.04.09 | Interview with lil | |
30.04.09 | Interview with dmitrigheorgheni | |
14.05.09 | Interview with King Bomba | |
28.05.09 | Interview with Alex Tufty Ashman | |
11.06.09 | Interview with Icy North | |
25.06.09 | Interview with Gnomon | |
09.07.09 | Interview with Skankyrich | |
23.07.09 | Interview with Malabarista | |
17.09.09 | Interview with Matt | |
12.10.09 | Interview with 2legs | |
19.10.09 | Interview with h5ringer | |
09.11.09 | Interview with Clive the Flying Ostrich | |
18.01.10 | Interview with Galaxy Babe |
Opti – An h2g2 Photographers Volunteer
An Introduction to the Flea Market
Opti – An H2G2 Scout Volunteer
Opti's Flea Market Rescues
Hans Christian Andersen - Author
Cary Grant – The Perfect Gentleman
Sound Advice-from GB
Opti, it's clear from your writing that you are very passionate about famous people, what they stand for, and how we can relate to them. I think that one area that you can improve is in the openings. For example, in Floella the first sentence is made passive by the phrase "best known for appearing in". An alternative would be to introduce her *as you feel about her* - your own words. Tell us how you feel, with no reference to her TV shows, until later. You need a hook, because we all know what she's famous for.
Names, I have noticed you don't check names, when they're really *the* most important thing about a person. There is nothing more annoying than having your name quoted incorrectly, or spelled wrong. Date of birth next. Then try to find out and add something that the reader wouldn't know, leaving them with a new impression of that person, which they will remember from your Entry.
An area where you fall down is your reliance on the known facts, which you assemble in no particular order - it leaves the sub-ed with the job of rewriting to make it flow. It helps to read the story as a story - you are telling the person reading about another person and you have to pretend you are in a room with them (the reader) and talking to just them about the person you are writing about.
When you submit your entries to PR they should be the best that you can make them, you do seem to rely a lot on Peer Reviewing to help you write your entry, and it shouldn't be that way. You've been writing long enough now to know what readers *want* to read, you're writing for them, not for the kudos of having an Entry grace the FP.
Aim for the wow factor, do you remember how you felt when you read about my Boating Lake entry? I would love to see how you write about *your* favourite beauty spot!
The thing that impresses me most about you is you really seem to earnestly want to write and want to improve, so it's worth the bother of continuing to assist you, (not just me, the other reviewers as well), you have improved in the way that you take suggestions and incorporate them into your work.
On a personal note I am impressed with the way you are doing your Scouting and you have become a valued member of the Photographers. I especially like that you bother to congratulate the winners and other authors when their articles are picked.
Currently Reading
- Assertiveness Training
- Building Confidence and Self Esteem
- Friends and Friendship
- Dealing with Difficult People
- Relaxation Techniques
- Brazil
- Haiku