h2g2 The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy: Earth Edition

ing shameless.

Well, , part of staying y is knowing the acceptable limits of shame... 'course, in this in part o the multiverse, there ain't in much that /isn't/ shameless and that's just the in way we like it

:: throws a after the in tart ::

HEY!!! No in throwin in here if you please... This IS a in Temple, you know 'Sides, I in LIKE , and heavin it about is a in waste... now THAT's a in bloody shame...




::pours a fresh Irish Cream and lights a morning ====~~::

* Calls in to a few virgins, on account of `em complainin` they`re being in neglected*

Well, someone`s got to keep the in standards up, ahem, as it were.

Do we have any ing standards, to speak of? Not the moral ing sort, I mean some nice off big flagpoles, the sort that look like you could use 'em as a lever to move the ing Earth if, to quote Archimeingdes, you gave me a firm enough place to ing stand.

::blinks and swigs at his ::

Y'know, 's not half a in bad idea... I'll be goin to in Ny'SpSSy pretty in soon to get us some more in virgins (hand-picked this time, no more o them in ), I'll check out their in selection... That raises the er of a question, though.... do we go with "
OFF!!!", or do we go with " ON!!!"????

Hmmmm... or maybe " YOU, I'M ING ING HERE, SO OFF, YA ING of a ER!"

Well, I'll go ing see what sort of a selection they've got first... maybe my sweet able Priestesses of would be willing to assist with the ing choosing...

For some ing unknown reason to me, the virgins I ing pick, arn't virgins any more.

They must be in' defective...

What about " ON OR OFF!"?

Hmmmm... not enough ing s... maybe "on or off, ya ing er!"

Re the in defective virgins....it wos me wot did it.

Which raises a in point here.
It surely aint right for the priestesses to be in the same in virgins that us male ers ?
I mean, it aint in healthy, in a manner of in speakin`
To say nothing of the ethical in aspect, surely there`s a deeper question of here?
When is a a ?...As opposed to a pseudo , that is?
Iffen you gets me in drift.

A beith a regardless of the that's ing it. The iness of any particular cannot be affected nor improperly ed based upon the who's doing the , you see, the is still a and all s are y, excepting only the , which of course We shall not speak of. Thusly, 'tis most y for the Priestesses of to be ing the same ing virgins that we are ing, for when the Priestesses a virgin, that virgin remaineth a virgin in and in truth, although perhaps not in . Verily, even did the virgins not remain virgins, 'twould /still/ be most y for the Priestesses to what and whoever they wish to eth, for they are indeed My own Priestesses, and whatsoever and whosoever they eth can only become the more y for it.
Heed the words and s of thy God of and take them unto heart and , for none shall be more y than if they with the selfless iness of My darling Priestesses of , and let no speak against them.

That sounds ing ful enough. If it's y enough for the ing God of , it's good enough for ing me!

you, my son

If it's all the same, I'll one of those virgins if you don't mind.

in lickspittles, that`s what certain ers are!!!
in yes sir, in no sir, please may I kiss your sir...fair turns yer in stomach over

gettin` a touch respectful in here Thog..needed stirrin` up a bit

When? ing when? I only ing agreed once, and then on something I basically ing came up with my ing self.

*Mutters into ing , don't worry I ain't that ing ed off*

Um... We can't be ing the same virgins. Once they're ed they're no longer virgins. So if you're ing a virgin, and I'm ing a virgin, then they must be different virgins... unless of course they're twins!

















Oh by the way...


HAPPY ING VALENTINE'S DAY YOU LOVELY LITTLE ERS!!!

and enjoy