A Conversation for The Field of Honour
Rolling Glasslands
Mystrunner Posted Mar 29, 2004
Dude, you know the rules of continuity. You can't just go and take it back.
Rolling Glasslands
His Divine Shadow: ACE, Shi Alyt Posted Mar 29, 2004
technically, that's not in the ruels of continuity. Reposts are often requested when something does not make sense or is rendered inaccurate due to other data. What you posted as to the nature of the energy net was in error, due to your lack of data on the nature of energy nets such as I employ. There-fore the explosion of the napalm was also in error. I humored you, you can humor me
Rolling Glasslands
Mystrunner Posted Mar 29, 2004
You let the explosion happen by reacting to it. Now, you could re-post how you deal with it, by being wounded or killed or at least something besides not being harmed, but, as continuity says,
>>Me: "I shoot a perfectly aimed shot at your forehead."
You: "You miss."
BAD- It was perfectly aimed, you can't change that in a second post.<<
Are your energy nets actually nets? Like, are there holes in them, because of strands of energy? Or are they just sheets?
Rolling Glasslands
His Divine Shadow: ACE, Shi Alyt Posted Mar 30, 2004
the closest thing the energy nets are to would be plasma contained in a magnetic field (which they are not, but act similarly). The energy net apears to be a web or net that strikes the target, flashes brightly, and vaporizes it. They never are specific as to how it works. But we do see a much larger version of the net projector used against Brunis II. The nets vaporize large portions of the crust down to the mantle and eject lava into space. Acts like plasma, vapes the target.
Key: Complain about this post
Rolling Glasslands
More Conversations for The Field of Honour
Write an Entry
"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is a wholly remarkable book. It has been compiled and recompiled many times and under many different editorships. It contains contributions from countless numbers of travellers and researchers."