h2g2 The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy: Earth Edition

the lord god creator of less than 5% of all creation

that has a better ring to it

wonder how warner will take it

normal commision rates are 10%

jehovah the dicount god

"Accepting the Messiah Jesus (Yeshua) - without the Christian theology"
http://www.jews-for-allah.org/

warner care to answer this http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/brunel/F19585?thread=6986662 ??????

Yeah, if you like ...

The OT is quite an old scripture, although basically true/correct, it is not completely reliable, IMO.

See http://jews-for-allah.org/israel/judaism_more_barbaric_than_islam.htm

and F14994880?thread=6988673&post=86873897#p86873897

for more insight into this problem
Peace

Warner said:

"Modern scholars believe that the Hebrew Bible, or Tanakh, was composed by four or five writers between 1000 to 400 BCE based on much older traditions. The New Testament was composed by a variety of writers between 60 to 110 CE. The contents of the New Testament were formalized by Athanasius of Alexandria in 367 CE, and finally canonized in 382 CE."

**The Qur'an is the primary text of Islam, revealed to the Prophet Muhammed beginning in the year 610 C.E. It was canonicalized between 644 and 656. The Qur'an is required reading for anyone who wants to understand Islam. Qur'an means "The Recital" in Arabic; according to the story, the angel Gabriel commanded Muhammed to "Recite!".
http://www.sacred-texts.com/bib/index.htm**

OT is a 'rewrite' of old scriptures, very interesting and a lot of relevant information/narratives.
Not a good idea to take them literally or as historically accurate without further more recent knowledge from that of NT or Qur'an.
Peace

This is pretty much why I don't take scripture at face value. The only way to know if it is true/good writing is comparing it with evidence, logic, and personal experience. Did the Israelites cross the Red Sea on dry land? I don't know. Honestly I don't think anyone could say for sure. It is pretty hard to find proof for or against this. Someone recorded it, but were they reliable? Someone eventually declared it god's word. Are they reliable? Even if they are, why should we trust what someone says is god's word?

heh, heh.

http://www.jesusandmo.net/2009/10/08/




What do you think, warner? Virgins or raisins?

Can we do something about warner?

He's hugely irritating.

Nah, he's hugely entertaining! Just read the twists of illogic as he tries to justify the unjustifiable!

RF

I get enough of that at work.

Warner posted a link to Jews For Allah. Let's hear the man behind that site talking to Richard Dawkins http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AMutsQbOOGI

I always wondered what happened to that guy.

I kinda hoped he stayed in Gaza.

Now we know what kind of company Warner keeps online.

Yes, you'd probably prefer him "as a jew", wouldn't you Clive ...
The closer one gets to the truth, the more satan becomes enraged and plots his distractions and division.

11 By the heaven which giveth the returning rain,
12 And the earth which splitteth (with the growth of trees and plants)
13 Lo! this (Qur'an) is a conclusive word,
14 It is no pleasantry.
15 Lo! they plot a plot (against thee, O Muhammad)
16 And I plot a plot (against them).
17 So give a respite to the disbelievers. Deal thou gently with them for a while.
Qur'an - The morning star

Peace

BTW Clive, you're wrong!
The only internet communities I communicate with are the BBC Message boards ...
Peace

>>Yes, you'd probably prefer him "as a jew", wouldn't you Clive ..<<

Actually I was reaching for 'delusional religious bigot'

Clive,
Of course he would seem 'bigoted' to you, as he's been blessed with considerable religious knowledge.
'Political baggage' is something that everybody carries, some more than others, admittedly.
Peace

"Is there among you person who was in the past very religious and now is atheist?"

*puts up hand*

TRiG.

Funny that. What you called blessed religious knowledge, I call bigotry.

What different pods we swim in.

ponds.

Warner you have this fixation with satan

satan first apeared in the OT and as you say

<>

so why not just drop it????

come to think of it......god first apears in the OT

and

<>