h2g2 The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy: Earth Edition

Its good that you get a lot of pleasure from supporting charities maybe if more people knew of the pleasure, more charities would reciee the just support they deserve

I was just talking to a girl earlier today about supporting charity. Sadly I don't think she meant what you guys do.

I found the pleasure gained from supporting charities is best when its mutual. When both the supporter and the supportee gain pleasure from the support the suporter is giving.


Though i believe i may have been a bit over supportive over the last few days.



Xan: Did the girl have a charities worth supporting?

Can't say I noticed. But she seemed a bit of a large girl, so probably yes.

That is not always true. Large girls can have small, eh, charities and vice versa.

What would you (all of you) prefer then?

No, but generally true.

I prefer big breasts, same as most of the male population

Well, yeh.... I've never as yet come across a pair of charities that were too* big

That so? Well, good for me

But why do models look like they look then?

That is all covered in the Do Guys Prefer Curves thread. Basically it is because models usually are chosen by women or gays.

Absolutely no idea. I've yet to see a famous model that I ever even remotely liked the look of too 'plastic' and 'artifical' Its beyond me, I mean as a rule they just don't 'do it' for me insufficient curves for one thing as a general rule

I think all this "Generic" chat about "Breasts" is misleading somewhat as the most fun I ever had was with a lovely lady who was a 32DD. Slim and...... well, very curvy up top.

I therefore observed that my primary interest in the subject is along the "Cup" size as opposed to straight "Breast" fixation. After several experiments on suitable subjects, I can conclude that a 32 /34 DD or above cup size float my particular boat............

I always remember, when I was still at school, going out with a girl who was a strawberry blonde. Her boobs looked quite large but, in fact she was a 34 s'thing or other. They looked large because she had a 'small back'. But what fascinated me the most was her n*pples (well, areolae really). They were so pale that one couldn't discern them from the rest of her breast. Her n*ples didn't stand up either, no matter how one attempted to stimulate them (I'll leave that to your fervent imaginations, gentlemen . It was as if this feature of her breasts didn't exist.

I think in terms of nipples, and nipples of the female, they are in terms of colour and other factors linked very closely with hormones maybe she'd just not 'developed' quite totally in all areas at that point? I mean, how old was she?

She was fifteen

Nipples are amazingly unique things, in terms of colour, aureola and erectionability. I never cease to be amazed at the variety.

B

I can't understand why women are so modest about their breasts. I wish they would come back into fashion.

I would actually say a DD cup would be too much.

Erectionability? Did you just make that word up?

itd be too much on a girl with only a 34 back measurement

Whereas a DD cup (or rather, a pair of them) would be perfectly placed on a 38" chest. I have a perfect example here, in shocking pink.

I really have been neglecting my charity work on H2 recently.

Mol