A Conversation for Ask h2g2
The Difference between Functional English & Traditional English
Cyzaki Posted Jul 20, 2005
I heard kids at school saying 'chimbley', I think it's easier to say than 'chimney' so kids who aren't so good at talking yet say 'chimbley'.
The Difference between Functional English & Traditional English
pheloxi | is it time to wear a hat? | Posted Jul 21, 2005
try say schoorsteen
..if suceeed try say it fast 10 times!
Dutch for chimny
The Difference between Functional English & Traditional English
Bagheera: Spellchecker, Grammarian Pedant, Semiquavering Secretary and member of the Punctuation Police Posted Jul 21, 2005
From a Geordie neighbour at Uni (vintage c. 1970)
"Ye gannin' dooon the wain ferra ween?"
At the fourth or fifth attempt, I discovered that the question being put to me was:
"Would you like to come with me down the road and I will buy you a pint?"
The Difference between Functional English & Traditional English
KB Posted Jul 21, 2005
When I was a kid, I thought the word was pronounced chimley, because that's what I'd thought I was hearing people say. Then when I learned to read I noticed it had an N. "Da, why is it pronounced 'chimley' when it has an N in it?" "Because it's *not* pronounced chimley!"
The Difference between Functional English & Traditional English
MoFoLo Posted Jul 21, 2005
Understand chimney is *not* pronounced chimley. But almost all the hillfolk and I knew a lot of well educated hillbillies, that I hung around witjh said chimley when they meant chimney. I just never understood why. If they had been backwoods, married your sister type I might not have given it a thought. But the people I hung around with were everything under the sun from truck drivers to structural engineers. Now I am hearing that many people from other countries also pronounced them chimleys as well. Is it a type of laziness or a difficulty with dialect? I guess it really doesn't matter. Originally I was thinking it was an isolation of my little part of the world. Now I see that there is more world out there than I suspected.
The Difference between Functional English & Traditional English
SuperMoo: Now With Even More Online-ness Posted Jul 22, 2005
...no...all I have is a quart of oil...
The Difference between Functional English & Traditional English
Ancient Brit Posted Jul 22, 2005
We have chimney, chimbly and chimbley in this thread. Why not chimbney or chimny, possibly chimley or chimly ? What kind of a word is it anyway.
We have climb and climate, why not climbate or should that be climnate. Of course limb is something else.
mn and mb go along with ou to combine in confusion. What is a comb ? See what I mean.
The Difference between Functional English & Traditional English
MoFoLo Posted Jul 22, 2005
What ever!!!!
I just know I will never tuckpoint another bick proturberance found on the roof. Come to think of it, I hate tuckpointing almost as much as figuring out what is meant by anything written in the English language. I just eight lunch and you no what that means? Yep time to go back, (actually restart as I didn't leave work), to work.
I think a comb is what is on the male chicken's head. He uses it to pull the seeds out of flax. I think.
<blacksheep)
The Difference between Functional English & Traditional English
Ancient Brit Posted Jul 22, 2005
Mo
Could it be that it was the Americans who made a start at trying to functionalise traditional English ?
The Difference between Functional English & Traditional English
MoFoLo Posted Jul 23, 2005
Heeey! you might have something there. I can dig it.
The more I think about it the more I realize why ain't will not be an official word. But I do think it needs to be included in the dictionary. Ain't is not just the functionally illiterate word of choice. It is used by many for a humerous effect. But one thing I truly believe, ain't is never going to go away, along with f*ck and swearing.
We have more ways to describe something. We can describe a situation in 50 ways and still have trouble understanding what was said. Could it be we are overly carried away with functional English. Do other languages run into the same problem?
The Difference between Functional English & Traditional English
McKay The Disorganised Posted Jul 24, 2005
"Ye gannin' dooon the wain ferra ween?"
Actually he's asking if you are going down the road for a drink - at no point is he offering to buy you one.
Chimbley I thought to be West Country (Glarstersheer) certainly I think thats where I picked it up as a child.
The Difference between Functional English & Traditional English
MoFoLo Posted Jul 24, 2005
>>"Would you like to come with me down the road and I will buy you a pint?"<<
Appears to be an offer for a pint to me. Okay so maybe it was taken a little of of context of the conversation. But gee, politicians and news do that all the time.
The Difference between Functional English & Traditional English
KB Posted Jul 24, 2005
"The more I think about it the more I realize why ain't will not be an official word. But I do think it needs to be included in the dictionary."
Is a dictionary a list of official words or a book to tell you what words mean?
The Difference between Functional English & Traditional English
SuperMoo: Now With Even More Online-ness Posted Jul 24, 2005
I'd say it's mainly the first but is becomeing more and more the second as publishers like to brag about having modern words...
The Difference between Functional English & Traditional English
Spaceechik, Typomancer Posted Jul 24, 2005
This is an interesting discussion about the word chimney -- but I grew up about 20 miles from Ann Arbor MI and have never heard anyone but small children use the word, "chimley." Usually with a lisp.
A couple of scurrilous observations I've heard on the evolution of the English language:
"English is the result of Norman soldiers attempting to pick up Anglo-Saxon bar maids."
And, my favorite, from an editor-friend's bumper sticker:
"English does not borrow from other Languages. English follows other Languages down dark alleys, hits them over the head, and goes through their pockets looking for loose grammar."
SC
The Difference between Functional English & Traditional English
MoFoLo Posted Jul 25, 2005
I see where in Oakland, CA that they wish to recognize "Ebonics" as a second language. Is this functional? So if my son went to school there and spoke and wrote in Black English he could possibly get the same grade as the kid writing answers to his quizes in Standard English. And the teachers will be coming from where? The ghettos?
As for Ann Arbor - Most of them probably don't. But there appears to be a pocket of people that have the hillbilly nasel sound but not the southern or south eastern dialect. The family I knew consisted of two brothers and two sisters, the siblings' spouses, and about six cousins. There were others, but I don't know if they were friends or family. One brother-in-law had hardly any accent and I don't recall his using the word.
The Difference between Functional English & Traditional English
pheloxi | is it time to wear a hat? | Posted Jul 25, 2005
The Difference between Functional English & Traditional English
U218534 Posted Jul 25, 2005
The Ebonics matter sparked a huge debate, about whether it should be recognised or not. I have a file on it somewhere... but it's probably at the bottom of a folder, in a large box, in a dark locked toilet with a sign on the door saying "Beware of the Leopard".
I'm sure it was around here somewhere...
Key: Complain about this post
The Difference between Functional English & Traditional English
- 81: Cyzaki (Jul 20, 2005)
- 82: pheloxi | is it time to wear a hat? | (Jul 21, 2005)
- 83: Bagheera: Spellchecker, Grammarian Pedant, Semiquavering Secretary and member of the Punctuation Police (Jul 21, 2005)
- 84: KB (Jul 21, 2005)
- 85: MoFoLo (Jul 21, 2005)
- 86: MoFoLo (Jul 21, 2005)
- 87: SuperMoo: Now With Even More Online-ness (Jul 22, 2005)
- 88: Ancient Brit (Jul 22, 2005)
- 89: MoFoLo (Jul 22, 2005)
- 90: Ancient Brit (Jul 22, 2005)
- 91: MoFoLo (Jul 23, 2005)
- 92: McKay The Disorganised (Jul 24, 2005)
- 93: MoFoLo (Jul 24, 2005)
- 94: KB (Jul 24, 2005)
- 95: SuperMoo: Now With Even More Online-ness (Jul 24, 2005)
- 96: echomikeromeo (Jul 24, 2005)
- 97: Spaceechik, Typomancer (Jul 24, 2005)
- 98: MoFoLo (Jul 25, 2005)
- 99: pheloxi | is it time to wear a hat? | (Jul 25, 2005)
- 100: U218534 (Jul 25, 2005)
More Conversations for Ask h2g2
- For those who have been shut out of h2g2 and managed to get back in again [28]
Last Week - What can we blame 2legs for? [19024]
5 Weeks Ago - Radio Paradise introduces a Rule 42 based channel [1]
5 Weeks Ago - What did you learn today? (TIL) [274]
Nov 6, 2024 - What scams have you encountered lately? [10]
Sep 2, 2024
Write an Entry
"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is a wholly remarkable book. It has been compiled and recompiled many times and under many different editorships. It contains contributions from countless numbers of travellers and researchers."