A Conversation for Ask h2g2
the God Delusion thread
anhaga Posted Oct 24, 2008
brauncowrider said:
'. . . that is an acheivement that demands a transcendental response, not a logical explanation.'
it doesn't 'demand' anything. If, however, you would like to respond in a transcendental manner (if that phrase actually has any meaning) then go ahead. Perhaps others would like to approach things more logically and actually come to an *understanding* of history rather than just responding to it.
clive said:
'If the supernatural is parallel to the natural world - how is it supposed to intersect or interact with it?'
trust me, you'll never get an answer to this one. You won't even get them to acknowledge that the question has been asked.
the God Delusion thread
Clive the flying ostrich: Amateur Polymath | Chief Heretic. Posted Oct 24, 2008
You mean my question about how, if the supernatural is parallel to the natural world, is it supposed to intersect or interact with it?
Perhaps if we repeat it often enough I might stand a chance, Surely they won't ignore me forever.
<------ optimist.
the God Delusion thread
IctoanAWEWawi Posted Oct 24, 2008
mmmm, how long ago did you start asking that question anhaga?
Although let us not be put off asking it - when anhaga asked it many moons ago it was one of main catalysts in the development of my thinking on the nature of existence and reality. It was a significant part of what started me on the path to rationalism as an approach to life.
the God Delusion thread
anhaga Posted Oct 24, 2008
'It was a significant part of what started me on the path to rationalism as an approach to life.'
I believe it's been years, by now.
I've just done something I should have done long ago to save time: A42586266
the God Delusion thread
Giford Posted Oct 24, 2008
Hi Effers,
As always, an interesting and offbeat point.
But... how am I supposed to put that in my Gifopedia? Argh!
Gif
NB:
the God Delusion thread
BouncyBitInTheMiddle Posted Oct 24, 2008
So, just post A42586266, and then leave it at that until someone responds?
the God Delusion thread
anhaga Posted Oct 24, 2008
Nobody will respond. I got tired of typing the thing out every time I wanted to ask again. Now I can just cut and paste or just put in the link.
But nobody will respond since, after all, there can be no answer.
the God Delusion thread
Alfster Posted Oct 24, 2008
Post on the donation site for the Athiest bus campaign:
Darth Vader: I find your lack of faith inspiring
Ah, Empire humour.
the God Delusion thread
anhaga Posted Oct 26, 2008
Gif:
Here's something from Iron chariots that might be a useful parallel to the Gifopedia http://wiki.ironchariots.org/index.php?title=50_reasons_to_believe_in_god
the God Delusion thread
Taff Agent of kaos Posted Oct 27, 2008
ref the aethiest slogans on the busses in response to religious slogans
typical you spend your whole life looking for a moral philosophy and two come along at the same time.......
the God Delusion thread
Clive the flying ostrich: Amateur Polymath | Chief Heretic. Posted Oct 27, 2008
the God Delusion thread
Giford Posted Oct 29, 2008
Just thinking a bit about Effer's idea that we can't say whether or not we believe in God until theists can say what they mean by 'God'.
Isn't it a bit passive? What's to stop us from coming up with a definition of 'God' and deciding whether we believe in it or not?
My attitude is that I have a rough idea what people mean by 'God', and I don't believe that such an entity exists. There's always the danger that someone will say "Oh, to me God is just my personal feeling of love for mankind" or "God is nature" or "God is whatever caused the Universe, but probably isn't an intelligent being". Then I'd have to admit that those things exist - but I wouldn't call them God.
(And plus, if we have our own definition of GOd then we could tell theists that what they believe in isn't really God )
Gif
the God Delusion thread
Taff Agent of kaos Posted Oct 29, 2008
GOD is the unified theory of everything
which science is trying to discover at the moment
when they work it out it will prove that GOD exists and therefore God will disapear in a puff of logic
headline
Science Kills God
now lets prove white is the new black......??
the God Delusion thread
Fathom Posted Oct 29, 2008
Actually purple is the new black.
Blessed is the straw man for he shall inherit the incontrovertible refutation.
As we are fast approaching Hallowe'en can I just take this opportunity to point and laugh at those who really believe this stuff?
http://www.albalagh.net/food_for_thought/halloween.shtml
F
the God Delusion thread
Fathom Posted Oct 29, 2008
Oops, and:
http://www.ancient-future.net/halloween.html
F
the God Delusion thread
taliesin Posted Oct 29, 2008
It never ceases to amaze me how religiotards manage to string words together into so many superficially coherent, yet ultimately meaningless phrases.
They really believe what they say makes sense....
Key: Complain about this post
the God Delusion thread
- 13821: anhaga (Oct 24, 2008)
- 13822: Clive the flying ostrich: Amateur Polymath | Chief Heretic. (Oct 24, 2008)
- 13823: IctoanAWEWawi (Oct 24, 2008)
- 13824: anhaga (Oct 24, 2008)
- 13825: Giford (Oct 24, 2008)
- 13826: Giford (Oct 24, 2008)
- 13827: BouncyBitInTheMiddle (Oct 24, 2008)
- 13828: anhaga (Oct 24, 2008)
- 13829: Alfster (Oct 24, 2008)
- 13830: anhaga (Oct 26, 2008)
- 13831: Taff Agent of kaos (Oct 27, 2008)
- 13832: Clive the flying ostrich: Amateur Polymath | Chief Heretic. (Oct 27, 2008)
- 13833: Giford (Oct 29, 2008)
- 13834: Taff Agent of kaos (Oct 29, 2008)
- 13835: Fathom (Oct 29, 2008)
- 13836: Fathom (Oct 29, 2008)
- 13837: taliesin (Oct 29, 2008)
- 13838: Xanatic (Oct 29, 2008)
- 13839: Tumsup (Oct 29, 2008)
- 13840: Fathom (Oct 29, 2008)
More Conversations for Ask h2g2
Write an Entry
"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is a wholly remarkable book. It has been compiled and recompiled many times and under many different editorships. It contains contributions from countless numbers of travellers and researchers."