A Conversation for Old Announcements: January - September 2011

This thread has been closed

13 February, 2004: Advance Notice of DNA Server Downtime

Post 21

Vicki Virago - Proud Mother

Oh yeah......smiley - blush

That'll teach me to read things properly! smiley - winkeye

As for not being on-line....we've got a virus at w*rk and I can't get on anyway - good job my parents have a computer (and the fact that my mums addicted to hootoo)! smiley - biggrin


13 February, 2004: Advance Notice of DNA Server Downtime

Post 22

R. Daneel Olivaw -- (User 201118) (Member FFFF, ARS, and DOS) ( -O- )

Good. I've been getting tonnes (not to mention tons and long tons) of 502 errors. I got one just trying to make this posting!


13 February, 2004: Advance Notice of DNA Server Downtime

Post 23

Whoami - iD dislikes punctuation

No danger of me being online then anyway...

SEF: I'm going to assume I'm reading your post wrong... smiley - winkeye

Whoami? smiley - cake


13 February, 2004: Advance Notice of DNA Server Downtime

Post 24

Lizzbett


smiley - cheers Thank gawd for that! I've seen the 'this service is not available' message about fourteen times in the last half hour.

I look forward to being able to peruse this website next weekend without endless error messages.smiley - surfer

Liz
~


13 February, 2004: Advance Notice of DNA Server Downtime

Post 25

Jim Lynn

The 'Service Not Available' errors should have stopped now. The monitoring which is supposed to auto-restart the servers when they need it had itself stopped, so the auto-restart wasn't getting called. Internet Services have just restarted the monitoring, and the restart on the faulty server happened automatically. So hopefully it should be more reliable from now on.


13 February, 2004: Advance Notice of DNA Server Downtime

Post 26

SEF

So you need monitoring on the monitoring to auto-restart the auto-restart. smiley - online2long


13 February, 2004: Advance Notice of DNA Server Downtime

Post 27

U218534

smiley - laugh


13 February, 2004: Advance Notice of DNA Server Downtime

Post 28

tom



Yup

That sounds real cool geek-speek smiley - biggrin

Suspect I'll be smiley - zzzsmiley - zzzsmiley - zzz at that time anyway.

Hmm.... smiley - zzz is under the heading "Actions" in the Smiley list.

I'll have to think about that onesmiley - smiley


13 February, 2004: Advance Notice of DNA Server Downtime

Post 29

R. Daneel Olivaw -- (User 201118) (Member FFFF, ARS, and DOS) ( -O- )

Thanks. It was getting really annoying, but I haven't had any trouble recently.


13 February, 2004: Advance Notice of DNA Server Downtime

Post 30

Old Hairy

The posting titled '13 February, 2004: Advance Notice of DNA Server Downtime' has often appeared below that titled '12 January 2004: DNA Server Downtime Advance Notice', suggesting two things

a) that such postings be given a special status (perhaps just a posting date at the projected down time), so that they remain at the top of the conversation list until they cease to be important.

b) that previous postings have their title changed to prevent any confusion, perhaps to 'Old Notice of DNA Server Downtime'.

Evidently, it was too much to expect that the users continuing their debate in the superceded conversation would remain silent for a day or two, despite being experienced users. I have not posted such a remark in that conversation, to prevent promoting it further and so adding to the confusion.

Please take this posting to be a feature suggestion, if you feel that this is appropriate.


13 February, 2004: Advance Notice of DNA Server Downtime

Post 31

Peet (the Pedantic Punctuation Policeman, Muse of Lateral Programming Ideas, Eggcups-Spurtle-and-Spoonswinner, BBC Cheese Namer & Zaphodista)

Old Hairy, the accepted order of things is that you read an announcement, then if you need no further information you unsubscribe from that conversation. In this way, continued "chattting" inconveniences nobody. If there are further announcements, or changes to a previous announcement, TPTB invariably announce them on a new thread, rather than adding to the existing one. smiley - geek


13 February, 2004: Advance Notice of DNA Server Downtime

Post 32

Lemon Blossom (aka Athena Albatross)

"The 'Service Not Available' errors should have stopped now. The monitoring which is supposed to auto-restart the servers when they need it had itself stopped, so the auto-restart wasn't getting called. Internet Services have just restarted the monitoring, and the restart on the faulty server happened automatically. So hopefully it should be more reliable from now on."

Unfortunately, they haven't. I started getting the messages.


13 February, 2004: Advance Notice of DNA Server Downtime

Post 33

Lemon Blossom (aka Athena Albatross)

It should say that I haven't stopped getting the messages.


13 February, 2004: Advance Notice of DNA Server Downtime

Post 34

Peet (the Pedantic Punctuation Policeman, Muse of Lateral Programming Ideas, Eggcups-Spurtle-and-Spoonswinner, BBC Cheese Namer & Zaphodista)

I've had three of them in the last 90 minutes... If every message is connected to a restart, there's going to be a lot of worn out HDDs at the BBC... smiley - yikes

Make that four; this is my second attempt at posting this. smiley - blue


13 February, 2004: Advance Notice of DNA Server Downtime

Post 35

Wiro

yes im getting a few ...


13 February, 2004: Advance Notice of DNA Server Downtime

Post 36

Dr Anthea - ah who needs to learn things... just google it!

a few...
thats a bit of an understatement, i am getting one nearly every time i try to post anything
see i juust got one as i tryed to post this...


13 February, 2004: Advance Notice of DNA Server Downtime

Post 37

Amy Pawloski, aka 'paper lady'--'Mufflewhump'?!? click here to find out... (ACE)

I was going to point out that the thingy needed kicking again, as I've been getting more errors than ever since it was announced to be fixed, but I've been beaten to it...


13 February, 2004: Advance Notice of DNA Server Downtime

Post 38

Evolutionary Theist

Besides the error messages, which sometimes close Internet Explorer, the time clock is messed up. It is giving impossible times for when postings were made, and reducing the ages down. When I looked at the same conversation twice, a posting actually got younger.

Something is serously wrong here, and doesn't seem to have been fixed. Whoever You Are, If You Are, please do something (though surely you have better things to do).


13 February, 2004: Advance Notice of DNA Server Downtime

Post 39

SEF

It is NARTHUR6 (of 0-7) which I'm not seeing at the moment. So that one might be down.


13 February, 2004: Advance Notice of DNA Server Downtime

Post 40

Lemon Blossom (aka Athena Albatross)

By the Tetracts of the Decad, what are you talking about, SEF? Is it something that everyone here knows about--if so could you please explain it anyway? I'm new here.


e^( ΒΆ i ) = -1


Key: Complain about this post

Write an Entry

"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is a wholly remarkable book. It has been compiled and recompiled many times and under many different editorships. It contains contributions from countless numbers of travellers and researchers."

Write an entry
Read more