A Conversation for Ask h2g2
Sorry, This is not meant as a new conversation. I was only curious to find out how many characters one can fit into a single subject-line. If you can still read this, it would mean that there are heaps of characters one can fit in here. ... ... :-) dadum
Tube - the being being back for the time being Started conversation Jul 16, 2001
Sorry, This is not meant as a new conversation. I was only curious to find out how many characters one can fit into a single subject-line. If you can still read this, it would mean that there are heaps of characters one can fit in here. ... ... :-) dadum
Tube - the being being back for the time being Posted Jul 16, 2001
Aha! So it's not unlimited even though the preview tells you so... the original subject was:
Sorry, This is not meant as a new conversation. I was only curious to find out how many characters one can fit into a single subject-line. If you can still read this, it would mean that there are heaps of characters one can fit in here. ... ... dadum, dadum wow, this thing really seems to go on for ever. Maybe I should start all conversations with the text of the first posting in the subject line? Whaddaya think? - Tube PS: Just had a preview and it really looks like one can go on for ever... Ok, I'll stop this now, apologies if I have bothered you by my little experiment!
Another insight gained!
Tube
Sorry, This is not meant as a new conversation. I was only curious to find out how many characters one can fit into a single subject-line. If you can still read this, it would mean that there are heaps of characters one can fit in here. ... ... :-) dadum
I'm not really here Posted Jul 16, 2001
Wicked Child.
Sorry, This is not meant as a new conversation. I was only curious to find out how many characters one can fit into a single subject-line. If you can still read this, it would mean that there are heaps of characters one can fit in here. ... ... :-) dadum
Clive the flying ostrich: Amateur Polymath | Chief Heretic. Posted Jul 16, 2001
Sorry, This is not meant as a new conversation. I was only curious to find out how many characters one can fit into a single subject-line. If you can still read this, it would mean that there are heaps of characters one can fit in here. ... ... :-) dadum
Orcus Posted Jul 17, 2001
Sorry, This is not meant as a new conversation. I was only curious to find out how many characters one can fit into a single subject-line. If you can still read this, it would mean that there are heaps of characters one can fit in here. ... ... :-) dadum
E G Mel Posted Jul 17, 2001
Sorry, This is not meant as a new conversation. I was only curious to find out how many characters one can fit into a single subject-line. If you can still read this, it would mean that there are heaps of characters one can fit in here. ... ... :-) dadum
Tube - the being being back for the time being Posted Jul 17, 2001
Me too!
Sorry, This is not meant as a new conversation. I was only curious to find out how many characters one can fit into a single subject-line. If you can still read this, it would mean that there are heaps of characters one can fit in here. ... ... :-) dadum
I'm not really here Posted Jul 17, 2001
Do they think subjects have no feelings? They need to be able to express themselves too.
(Does anyone think I am taking this too far? )
Sorry, This is not meant as a new conversation. I was only curious to find out how many characters one can fit into a single subject-line. If you can still read this, it would mean that there are heaps of characters one can fit in here. ... ... :-) dadum
E G Mel Posted Jul 17, 2001
Sorry, This is not meant as a new conversation. I was only curious to find out how many characters one can fit into a single subject-line. If you can still read this, it would mean that there are heaps of characters one can fit in here. ... ... :-) dadum
I'm not really here Posted Jul 17, 2001
Sorry, This is not meant as a new conversation. I was only curious to find out how many characters one can fit into a single subject-line. If you can still read this, it would mean that there are heaps of characters one can fit in here. ... ... :-) dadum
E G Mel Posted Jul 18, 2001
Sorry, This is not meant as a new conversation. I was only curious to find out how many characters one can fit into a single subject-line. If you can still read this, it would mean that there are heaps of characters one can fit in here. ... ... :-) dadum
I'm not really here Posted Jul 18, 2001
Anyone younger than me is a young person. Even people older than me are young people as well.
Sorry, This is not meant as a new conversation. I was only curious to find out how many characters one can fit into a single subject-line. If you can still read this, it would mean that there are heaps of characters one can fit in here. ... ... :-) dadum
E G Mel Posted Jul 18, 2001
Sorry, This is not meant as a new conversation. I was only curious to find out how many characters one can fit into a single subject-line. If you can still read this, it would mean that there are heaps of characters one can fit in here. ... ... :-) dadum
Clelba Posted Jul 19, 2001
has anyone actually counted how many characters you can have?
^. .^
= ' =
123456789112345678921234567893123456789412345678951234567896123456789712345678981234567899123456789A123456789B123456789C123456789D123456789E123456789F123456789G
NMcCoy (attempting to standardize my username across the Internet. Formerly known as Twinkle.) Posted Jul 23, 2001
Okay, now let's see how many that is...
123456789112345678921234567893123456789412345678951234567896123456789712345678981234567899123456789A123456789B123456789C123456789D123456789E123456789F123456789G123456789h123456789i123456789j123456789k123456789l123456789m123456789n
NMcCoy (attempting to standardize my username across the Internet. Formerly known as Twinkle.) Posted Jul 23, 2001
oops, apparently that didn't reach the limit. Trying again...
123456789112345678921234567893123456789412345678951234567896123456789712345678981234567899123456789A123456789B123456789C123456789D123456789E123456789F123456789G123456789h123456789i123456789j123456789k123456789l123456789m123456789n123456789o123456789p12345
NMcCoy (attempting to standardize my username across the Internet. Formerly known as Twinkle.) Posted Jul 23, 2001
Hmm, it keeps going and going and going...
No Subject
NMcCoy (attempting to standardize my username across the Internet. Formerly known as Twinkle.) Posted Jul 23, 2001
Key: Complain about this post
Sorry, This is not meant as a new conversation. I was only curious to find out how many characters one can fit into a single subject-line. If you can still read this, it would mean that there are heaps of characters one can fit in here. ... ... :-) dadum
- 1: Tube - the being being back for the time being (Jul 16, 2001)
- 2: Tube - the being being back for the time being (Jul 16, 2001)
- 3: I'm not really here (Jul 16, 2001)
- 4: Clive the flying ostrich: Amateur Polymath | Chief Heretic. (Jul 16, 2001)
- 5: Orcus (Jul 17, 2001)
- 6: E G Mel (Jul 17, 2001)
- 7: Tube - the being being back for the time being (Jul 17, 2001)
- 8: I'm not really here (Jul 17, 2001)
- 9: E G Mel (Jul 17, 2001)
- 10: I'm not really here (Jul 17, 2001)
- 11: E G Mel (Jul 18, 2001)
- 12: I'm not really here (Jul 18, 2001)
- 13: E G Mel (Jul 18, 2001)
- 14: Clelba (Jul 19, 2001)
- 15: I'm not really here (Jul 19, 2001)
- 16: NMcCoy (attempting to standardize my username across the Internet. Formerly known as Twinkle.) (Jul 23, 2001)
- 17: NMcCoy (attempting to standardize my username across the Internet. Formerly known as Twinkle.) (Jul 23, 2001)
- 18: NMcCoy (attempting to standardize my username across the Internet. Formerly known as Twinkle.) (Jul 23, 2001)
- 19: NMcCoy (attempting to standardize my username across the Internet. Formerly known as Twinkle.) (Jul 23, 2001)
- 20: Clelba (Jul 24, 2001)
More Conversations for Ask h2g2
Write an Entry
"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is a wholly remarkable book. It has been compiled and recompiled many times and under many different editorships. It contains contributions from countless numbers of travellers and researchers."