A Conversation for functional viewer dysfunctions
- 1
- 2
Yeah, but with the name tags I use, it looks pretty silly.
Tonsil Revenge (PG) Started conversation Jan 29, 2004
Particularly with this one:
Proof that evolution in the short term doesn't work: (egnever lisnot) This is my 42nd year.
Yeah, but with the name tags I use, it looks pretty silly.
~ jwf ~ scribblo ergo sum Posted Jan 29, 2004
Yes, I have found that 'ID tags' reveal many flaws in assorted nickname sluglines. That's one reason I have been using 'quotation marks' a lot lately.
You will be happy to see I have taken on board your concerns regarding my last one "taking sumo-intellectualism to an awl knew hi"
and shortened it to a simpler and humbler 'sumo-intellectual' self descriptor.
~jwf~ (sumo-intellectual)
Yeah, but with the name tags I use, it looks pretty silly.
Tonsil Revenge (PG) Posted Jan 30, 2004
yes, but it still lends the mental image of you wearing nothing but a large diaper while debating William F. Buckley...
Yeah, but with the name tags I use, it looks pretty silly.
~ jwf ~ scribblo ergo sum Posted Jan 30, 2004
And that image is wrong ..why?
On balance it all seems to work out, what with 'diaper' being as close to the real thing as W.F.Buckley is to being a genuine intellect.
But I have some further changes in mind as well...
~jwf~ judo-intellectual
Yeah, but with the name tags I use, it looks pretty silly.
fluffykerfuffle Posted Jul 30, 2007
Dear . .. ...i am not fluffykerfuffle.. . . .i think she is over there somewhere.. . .. . .no i'm not.. .. . .yes you are! ...no! ...yes!,
I am writing to you . .. ...i am not fluffykerfuffle.. . . .i think she is over there somewhere.. . .. . .no i'm not.. .. . .yes you are! ...no! ...yes! because you, . .. ...i am not fluffykerfuffle.. . . .i think she is over there somewhere.. . .. . .no i'm not.. .. . .yes you are! ...no! ...yes!, are possibly the only one who can help.
Fear not my dear . .. ...i am not fluffykerfuffle.. . . .i think she is over there somewhere.. . .. . .no i'm not.. .. . .yes you are! ...no! ...yes!. I am not seeking your financial support, only your sympathies and empathies. If you . .. ...i am not fluffykerfuffle.. . . .i think she is over there somewhere.. . .. . .no i'm not.. .. . .yes you are! ...no! ...yes! can find it somewhere in your trembling heart to spare me a little consideration, I will reveal to you . .. ...i am not fluffykerfuffle.. . . .i think she is over there somewhere.. . .. . .no i'm not.. .. . .yes you are! ...no! ...yes! one of the many ways this 'internet' thingy is rotting your brain and turning you into a paranoid zombie.
Yeah, but with the name tags I use, it looks pretty silly.
~ jwf ~ scribblo ergo sum Posted Aug 3, 2007
God bless ye m'dear for the time warp back to this conversation of three years passed.
I have noted your presence elsewhere here-abouts with some enthusiasm as I often do when new names appear in our ranks having either something to offer, something to say or a really funny twist on established norms.
The confusion of , both as a space for individual creative embellishments and as a surprising, sometimes paranoia inducing, computer-code trick of the light, is but one (or two) of the many whirleds of h2g2 to be explored. And again I do thank you for your fresh insights! And some good memories.
~jwf~
Yeah, but with the name tags I use, it looks pretty silly.
fluffykerfuffle Posted Aug 4, 2007
hi ! nice ta meet ya, jwf
the many whirleds of h2g2 to be explored.. . . .
ahh.. . . like this one? A1124786
Yeah, but with the name tags I use, it looks pretty silly.
~ jwf ~ scribblo ergo sum Posted Aug 7, 2007
Hmmm... that's wierd. A whole new sub-section I've never seen before called 'Book of the Future- visions of 2020'. And in a powder blue screen in a skin called 'alabaster' that is unlike the h2g2 alabaster I know and love. Feeling confused and dizzy. Must sit down. Oh wait, I am sitting. Hmmm...
~jwf~
Yeah, but with the name tags I use, it looks pretty silly.
~ jwf ~ scribblo ergo sum Posted Aug 14, 2007
I'm glad you posted that link because some day, one day, in the soon-to-be, I will once again have full time access to the interwebby and sufficient time to properly indulge my online addictions.
They say that the rather remote rural area into which I moved two years ago will join the 21st century techno-revolution in maybe a year or so.
For the present I remain at the mercy of a rural public library which has somehow hard-wired itself into the web. They allow me a couple of hours each week. In summer it becomes a battle of wills with youngsters all around doing something called 'Summer Library Computer Camp' which looks like all the world to me to be nothing more than electronic donkey tail placements and Pacman races.
But soon, I will have time and means to explore the 2020 visions and I will be grateful for your direction.
peace
~jwf~
Yeah, but with the name tags I use, it looks pretty silly.
fluffykerfuffle Posted Aug 17, 2007
okay
i have been offline because of Hurricane Flossie and because of electrical problems in our community... so i know about the hassels of internet connectiveness or its reverse therein... and i haven't been reading the articles either... but DNA wrote one and i hope to find it one of these days... i cant find an index...
here's hoping we have that discussion before 2020
Yeah, but with the name tags I use, it looks pretty silly.
~ jwf ~ scribblo ergo sum Posted Aug 20, 2007
Flossie, eh. Not sure how they got to 'F' for Flossie while 'D' for Dean was still tracking into the Caribean. Course I never really thought about that until you mentioned it, but yes now you mention it, I had heard of a Flossie that was in the Pacific and threatening to hit Honolulu? Don't tell me you're in the Galapagos! Can't think of anything else between the mainland and the Hawaiian Islands.
peace
~jwf~
Yeah, but with the name tags I use, it looks pretty silly.
Tonsil Revenge (PG) Posted Aug 20, 2007
A-hem.
Yeah, but with the name tags I use, it looks pretty silly.
Chris Morris Posted Aug 20, 2007
May I say how nice it is to find that someone has unearthed the Book of the Future? The articles you've found are the ones that made it into the printed version of the book and, while they are (of course) very good, there were several that I thought were exceptionally good but didn't get voted in (probably because most of the voting was done by the people who were using the site regularly). Altogether, I believe, there were about 1000 articles submitted.
I should add, to stay vaguely on topic, that when I first looked at the site I assumed that other users chose strange nicknames because they were famous people who wanted to keep their identities secret and, being not famous, I used my real name. I've since regretted missing the opportunity of having a Witty Moniker as I'm sure it does have an effect on the way people read your postings.
Yeah, but with the name tags I use, it looks pretty silly.
fluffykerfuffle Posted Aug 21, 2007
yes it is hard to get people to take me seriously, Chris. However, i do find your name quite droll.
is there anyway to find those 900 other entries?
Yeah, but with the name tags I use, it looks pretty silly.
Chris Morris Posted Aug 21, 2007
Thank you, I've always wanted to be thought of as droll - although I'm never entirely sure what it means!
If you go to my space and click on any of the BotF articles, you should see a list of categories on the left hand side that will give you access to all the articles.
I used to be surprised that so few hootooers knew about BotF but (apart from the fact that the BBC found themselves "unable" to publicise it after it got started) I've been around here long enough now to realise how little exploring most people do, perhaps because a lot of people access the site from work?
Enjoy the articles - I should add that some contributors were very unhappy with the standard of editing so you might find it worthwhile looking at the unedited versions.
Chris
Yeah, but with the name tags I use, it looks pretty silly.
fluffykerfuffle Posted Aug 21, 2007
oh h h thank you, i see now... read a few... very neato... how do i find the unedited ones.. oh i know... go to their personal space and look ... good on!
droll: comical in an odd or whimsical manner... i emphasize the whimsical.
yeah, i think we go reading when we calm down or get bored with the clever repartee in the threads... thats what i do... or if i come on first thing in the morning... with my coff of cuppee.
Yeah, but with the name tags I use, it looks pretty silly.
fluffykerfuffle Posted Aug 21, 2007
hootooers are the only ones left because they were too busy posting messages to take part in the riots
Key: Complain about this post
- 1
- 2
Yeah, but with the name tags I use, it looks pretty silly.
- 1: Tonsil Revenge (PG) (Jan 29, 2004)
- 2: ~ jwf ~ scribblo ergo sum (Jan 29, 2004)
- 3: Tonsil Revenge (PG) (Jan 30, 2004)
- 4: ~ jwf ~ scribblo ergo sum (Jan 30, 2004)
- 5: Tonsil Revenge (PG) (Jan 31, 2004)
- 6: fluffykerfuffle (Jul 30, 2007)
- 7: ~ jwf ~ scribblo ergo sum (Aug 3, 2007)
- 8: fluffykerfuffle (Aug 4, 2007)
- 9: ~ jwf ~ scribblo ergo sum (Aug 7, 2007)
- 10: fluffykerfuffle (Aug 11, 2007)
- 11: ~ jwf ~ scribblo ergo sum (Aug 14, 2007)
- 12: fluffykerfuffle (Aug 17, 2007)
- 13: ~ jwf ~ scribblo ergo sum (Aug 20, 2007)
- 14: Tonsil Revenge (PG) (Aug 20, 2007)
- 15: Tonsil Revenge (PG) (Aug 20, 2007)
- 16: Chris Morris (Aug 20, 2007)
- 17: fluffykerfuffle (Aug 21, 2007)
- 18: Chris Morris (Aug 21, 2007)
- 19: fluffykerfuffle (Aug 21, 2007)
- 20: fluffykerfuffle (Aug 21, 2007)
More Conversations for functional viewer dysfunctions
Write an Entry
"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is a wholly remarkable book. It has been compiled and recompiled many times and under many different editorships. It contains contributions from countless numbers of travellers and researchers."