h2g2 The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy: Earth Edition

I remember Adelaide's response. With somewhat more clarity, I also remember her very contrite, unreserved and (with relevence to this situation) equally public apology for what she said, so in my book the case is closed.

'Perhaps you are confusing disliking Member with liking Della?'

I'm never quite sure how to feel about Member. However, I certainly know the difference between my feelings for him, and for Adelaide. She has earned my trust, approval and friendship in the past. My first impression of Member, on the other hand, was that he was abrasive and rude. I'm aware there's another side, but it was somewhat overpowered...

- Jordan

Della and trust eh?

What unreserved apology?

The ones she later back tracked on whena little of the on site heat had died down or the ones where she managed to find space to blame others for what she had said or the ones where she managed to still point the finger of accusation at people for things that they didnt do, would never do and had previously never done.

I know you like Adelaide that much is clear and you have akind heart in being willing to hold out the hand of forgiveness to someone who continually lies and spits fire at people who are undeserving of that treatment. Like I say the world would be a nicer place if more people were like you Jordan.

It isnt though and we cant pretend it is. If as you say the matter is closed for you then that's all well and good but your ability to bury your head in the sand does not change a thing for anyone else.

The situation is nasty. There are requests for apologies, misconceptions, hasty accusations and a heck of a lot of bitchiness (and I'm not pointing to ANYONE, but to the general behavior) contributing to it. Its perpetuation serves only to degrade the participants further; the whole thing is degenerate, and does nothing to improve anything or anyone in the slightest.

After you said this we had an apology From Adelaide and I said any apology was worthless without a follow up attitude that showed a real change of heart but within two weeks Adelaide was up to her usual tricks

And as you and your, (what was your expression, 'clan?') always say when horning in on someone's otherwise pleasant conversation, it's a public site!

A false accusation against az who never horned in on anyones conversation.

It's not like he has made a point of commenting on anyone else's photo...

An unfounded assertion which bares no relation to the truth but is used to make another researcher look bad.

azahar, making your "polite request" on a thread called 'Death Threat Della', when you could easily have started a new message, was deliberately provocative and calculated to incite unpleasant feelings.

A hasty, prejudiced, and discriminatory accusation against az, which she has not bothered to bring up against anyone else.

I have had one name, until Member wrecked it, then I changed to Annie Laurie, which he attempted to pun on, but it was beyond him, poor dear. Then I settled on Adelaide, which was (a) a childhood nickname and (b) incorporates Della and Adele, which was a name I had on an account I started when there were server problems and I couldn't log on. I had to ditch Adele, when I somehow got onto Member's
hate list back last Novemeber.

Finally her favoured tactic willful deceptions and annoyin revisions of past events.

why do you still defend this woman on these charges?

While your blinkered support is available she is less likely to even think about ending this.

one love

<>



Somehow I think you will eventually, Della. Because you also said a few postings back: <> and you're still here.

Hmmm . . . will the mysterious DMM end up being yet another 'family member' I wonder? One of 'the sisters' recently spoken about on this very thread? Or perhaps a long lost cousin or even a computer savvy elderly aunt or uncle? Or is he simply the eldest son as seems most likely? Stay tuned, folks.

This is almost as exciting as it was waiting to find out who shot JR.

az

"This is almost as exciting as it was waiting to find out who shot JR"

....

And the acting is every bit as hammy! !

Liar, liar bums on fire


Didnt you say you were getting bore with all this

Who me?

I've been bored with it for ages. As is Jimster, it would seem. The difference being that he gets paid to be bored here and I have to do it for nuthin.

Can't help it though. Just cannot stand by and let all those lies carry on and on and on . . .


well, buenas noches everyone,
azzzzzzz

nighty night ducky

<>

Twice? Please explain.
Re my post having been removed by the moderators.. Was it them, or was it you yikesing? Once again, please explain...

Once you tore into him by starting the "mediation" thread on his space. The next time I saw was I think when he tried to aid you over the recent death threat "hilarity"....like one of your sons could kill me

Forgive my lack of full recall off the top of my head it is so hard keeping track of all the times you have flown off the handle at people. I'm wondering at your lack of recall infact and imbegining to seriously think that you are displaying symptoms reminiscent of the onset of alhzeimers or another kind of senility associated with ageing.

You get bad tempered very quicly and have trouble remebering recent events but your correspondence is littered with tales of your childhood and odd anecdotes

If you wait till tomorrow i can dig up the links for you, if you like.

In simple words, as we have often explained before.

1) *you* posted a racist insult aimed at me.

2) I kindly pointed out what you had done and made a fulsome explanation of your error in using that word.

3) Oetzi (as he admitted) yikesed your post.

4) the moderation team removed your post.

one love

Ah so, glasshopper...
<>
Not really. If you knew for sure, you would say. I have apologised to Jordan over the Mediation thread.. and he has accepted that...
<>

Thanks a bundle, BB. (a) I am not that old, and (b) I am perfectly fine but thanks for your concern.

Oh, and thanks for clarifying that it was Oetzi (!) yikesing, and not the moderators themselves who removed the post...

Adelaide, the only time Moderators remove posts is if the person is on pre-moderation and their post is deemed to break the House Rules. Every other time it's because someone presses the button. Moderators do not yikes posts.

Thanks for clarifying

Oetzi told you about sixth months ago. If you paid attention and devoted a little of your remaining brain power to the matters at hand you might already have known this *and* how the moderation system works.

Funny how you can start an official complaint with no real knowlede of how the site is run then be on thread that is discussing moderation and not pick-up such basic information.

I dont think you should dismiss the likely hood of age related brain dysfunction so lightly, it can start suprisingly early. It might explain how you can be so regularly and spectacularly wrong.

one love

Azahar "[Months ago on another thread] on a different site . . ."

Hmm I wonder how one comes by this kind of pardoning.

Apparition (whom everyong is insisting is me) is accused of making rude and abusive comments on a photo site.

The *actual* comments are posted and now the story emphasis has changed to apparition's behaviour on this site (Nice deflection BTW )

Flipper's threats of violence are dissmissed as "Months ago on another thread..." and I can only assume that his dramatic leaving (twice) and comming back (this time) under a new name is excused the same way.

By any chance would the "wigger" incident be around the same "Months ago" time frame as the "faggot ass" incident?

Could one conclude that the problem here is not what is done at any given time but who it is done by? (for the s l o w that was a rhetorical question as the answer is obvious)

<>

Well, your mother posted the text of one of the insults admitting it was yours, so you is not merely being 'accused' are you?

<>

I haven't noticed that. It doesn't bother me a bit if you want to continue your fight with Flipper and blicky *here* on h2g2.

<>

You have totallly missed my point in complaining about 'Apparition' here. The complaint was about you abusing my photo site because of something that happened *here* several months ago. Flipper and blicky and Member have not abused my photo site by taking this fight over there.

<>

Well, the obvious answer is that you can conclude whatever you like, especially if you don't clearly read what has been posted here.

az

Well said az, you go girl!....

....but not go in the Appy sense...well actually you can "go" in the Appy sense....I wouldnt have to miss you for long.

Azahar "[Months ago on another thread] on a different site . . ."
Hmm I wonder how one comes by this kind of pardoning.

What a good question DMM.

I can only think that by apologising for his actions, not doing it again and not then pretending he didnt do it or blaming someone else for doing it, he has been forgiven.

Lets break that down for the S L O W and those with failing memories shall we?

APOLOGISING

NOT REPEATING THE ACT

NOT DODGING THE FACTS

NOT BLAMING OTHERS FOR YOUR ACTS


The *actual* comments are posted and now the story emphasis has changed to apparition's behaviour on this site.

How can you say they were the *actual* comments?

Are you in touch with Appy? Did Adelaide tell you they were the *actual* comments?

I wouldnt trust either of them if I were you they are both proven and unapologetic liars. Just a warning, who you trust is up to you.



I can only assume that his dramatic leaving (twice) and comming back (this time) under a new name is excused the same way.

Well as far as I know Flipper is not pretending that he is a different person to the guy we first go to know and given the reasons that he left I am personally not surprised he took a hiatus.

You whine like a stuck pig when people visit your PS he had his email violated by a vengeful, spiteful, violently threatening person who seemed to enjoy going to peoples personal spaces to extend flame wars. What would you do if something like that was happening to you




By any chance would the "wigger" incident be around the same "Months ago" time frame as the "faggot ass" incident?

Your research wasnt up to much was it? No the two incidents were seperated by several weeks.



Could one conclude that the problem here is not what is done at any given time but who it is done by? (for the s l o w that was a rhetorical question as the answer is obvious)

Rhetoric as someone as smart as you should know can sound good but might not contain any good sense at all. One can conclude anything one likes but it doe not make it right. We can look at of our windows and conclude that the is flat, it can look that way however if we lived on a space station we might come to a different conclusion.


Yes your opening question was a *really* good one. Unfortunately you forgot the question mark (?) something Adelaide has problems with. Maybe its a genetic problem.

one love

<> (Della)

<> (me, posting 163)

Della, after your posting was yikes'd by Oetzi you started a thread on his page called 'Going off half-cocked' or something like that. So you *did* know it was him, even without me reminding you a few pages back.

az

Be nice to Adelaide she has trouble remebering things, she cant even keep hold of what her name is. Poor dear.