A Conversation for Old Announcements: January - September 2011
This thread has been closed
13 October - New Registration
Peet (the Pedantic Punctuation Policeman, Muse of Lateral Programming Ideas, Eggcups-Spurtle-and-Spoonswinner, BBC Cheese Namer & Zaphodista) Posted Oct 17, 2003
13 October - New Registration
I'm not really here Posted Oct 18, 2003
As I didn't have any problem with any of my accounts, 'survived' isn't really appropriate for me. :D
13 October - New Registration
I'm not really here Posted Oct 18, 2003
I'd rather that you and I kept at opposite ends of the site SEF.
I'm unsubscribing. If anyone else wants me, come and find me.
13 October - New Registration
Mr Inertia - Now new, improved and mostly human! Posted Jan 12, 2004
I managed to get on with SSO - but why am I now showing negative un- read posts on some of my conversations?
13 October - New Registration
SEF Posted Jan 12, 2004
That has been happening to a lot of people ever since Jim introduced the new feature. It seems to be related to whether or not you have read all the pages of a conversation (possibly in the right order). It doesn't even have to be a long thread to get negative numbers appearing. Reading these threads sometimes, but not always (hence the caveat about order), then makes the number of new posts indication work properly.
13 October - New Registration
SEF Posted Jan 12, 2004
"I did read all the backlog" - well so far the problem hasn't been identified precisely. So see if you can figure out anything from the affected threads and how you read them.
"Why me???" - why not you since it seems to affect just about everybody. I don't recall anyone posting to say they don't have a single thread with a negative number of new posts. You'll just have to fall back on previous methods of telling whether anything has been posted (eg comparison with the last time you posted and other threads in your conversation list).
13 October - New Registration
SEF Posted Jan 12, 2004
As it should be all relatively fresh in your mind, having just noticed the problem, is there anything which links your threads with the -ve numbers and distinguishes them from those which don't have -ve numbers? Note that probably all pre-existing threads before the feature was introduced will probably have had -ve numbers but that those may go away when you read them or post to them (ie initialising a variable in software terms). The really interesting ones are those which *have* been read or posted to by a given user since the feature was added and yet still persist in showing a negative number of new posts.
13 October - New Registration
Mr Inertia - Now new, improved and mostly human! Posted Jan 12, 2004
Nothing special about any of them. I've posted to and received replies from all the threads I'm involved with - and there's just two with -ve numbers of posts. The only new thread is this one which seems to be working OK.
Wierd, huh!
Key: Complain about this post
13 October - New Registration
- 341: toybox (Oct 17, 2003)
- 342: Peet (the Pedantic Punctuation Policeman, Muse of Lateral Programming Ideas, Eggcups-Spurtle-and-Spoonswinner, BBC Cheese Namer & Zaphodista) (Oct 17, 2003)
- 343: Wøñkø (Oct 17, 2003)
- 344: I'm not really here (Oct 18, 2003)
- 345: SEF (Oct 18, 2003)
- 346: I'm not really here (Oct 18, 2003)
- 347: J (Oct 18, 2003)
- 348: Mr Inertia - Now new, improved and mostly human! (Jan 12, 2004)
- 349: SEF (Jan 12, 2004)
- 350: Mr Inertia - Now new, improved and mostly human! (Jan 12, 2004)
- 351: SEF (Jan 12, 2004)
- 352: Mr Inertia - Now new, improved and mostly human! (Jan 12, 2004)
- 353: SEF (Jan 12, 2004)
- 354: Mr Inertia - Now new, improved and mostly human! (Jan 12, 2004)
More Conversations for Old Announcements: January - September 2011
- Thursday 20 October 2011: Bug Fixing Update: you have your names back. [204]
Dec 21, 2011 - Announcements [172]
Dec 11, 2011 - Friday 30 September, 2011: H2G2 Moves to its New Home [155]
Oct 21, 2011 - Announcements from the new h2g2! editors. Small bug with the yikes button. [86]
Oct 20, 2011 - Wednesday 07 September, 2011: Jane Belson has Passed Away [74]
Sep 16, 2011
Write an Entry
"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is a wholly remarkable book. It has been compiled and recompiled many times and under many different editorships. It contains contributions from countless numbers of travellers and researchers."