A Conversation for Talking About the Guide - the h2g2 Community
Not worth the pain
Matholwch - Brythonic Tribal Polytheist Posted Jan 26, 2008
Hi Vicky
Out of respect for Blicky's peacemaking I will stop calling you Della, as long as you respond by beginning to give straight answers...
"I've never claimed to be persecuted. I don't know why you say I have."
Hmmm... perhaps it is because of statements like this:
"But with all due respect to them, my status here is different - I have been designated a target... so it's very likely that questions I am asked are not genuine queries."
Now stop hogging the petard
Anyhoo, back to business...
Scripture. Would you care to tell us why you think you can pick and choose the elements of scripture you please, yet still call yourself a 'christian'?
My little list of scriptural proscriptions on the rights of women according to two men who you and I have argued over before (I said they were mysogynists and you said they weren't) is a case in point and allows us to concentrate out debate around a single instance rather than wander all over the NT.
Any chance of an answer on this one?
Blessings,
Matholwch .
The God(s) Thread
Matholwch - Brythonic Tribal Polytheist Posted Jan 26, 2008
Hi Jalanterus
"That is beyond a lapse in netiquette; it shows an utter lack of human decency."
Compared to some of the behaviour we have seen here, it is relatively mild. I think my good friend Az is just tired of Vicky capering about brandishing this like some clever discovery.
Az has a very strong web presence, and one that does her and her partner great credit. She also has literally hundreds of virtual and actual friends as a result of her humanity and kindness, so has nothing to fear from Vicky's blunt attempts at intimidation.
The use of such threats reflects badly only on the user.
Blessings,
Matholwch .
The God(s) Thread
U10920173 Posted Jan 26, 2008
Indeed it does and I'm glad that the threat is relatively meaningless in this instance.
To go back to the analogy, just because one of her bullets has damp powder doesn't imply we should tolerate her brandishing a firearm. Net exposure is a filthy, inexcusable act of cowardice and perfectly reflective of the person who threatens it.
It's beyond me why this site would tolerate it.
But, by all means, peace!
The God(s) Thread
Noggin the Nog Posted Jan 26, 2008
<> Vicky
As EtB said elsewhere, I don't doubt you sincerely believe this, but neither do I doubt the sincerity of those who feel otherwise (and not just because I happen to agree with them). Of course, it's likely the case that the opposite is true, too, and that believers feel that the rationalists haven't answered questions put to them. Sometimes one has to dig a little deeper to see how this happens.
Noggin
The God(s) Thread
U10939747 Posted Jan 29, 2008
Blicky, I hope you see fit to come back! Your contributions are very valuable indeed...
The Man of a thousand Faces (oh, no. That was Lon Caney)
The God(s) Thread
azahar Posted Jan 29, 2008
Oh *finally* someone noticed!
I thought it was rather good myself, but I can't take total credit for it as I had a little help from across the room.
az
The God(s) Thread
DA ; Simply Vicky: Don't get pithy with me! Posted Jan 29, 2008
Okey dey... so a sense of decency won't stop you using the name you used to bully me under, and threats won't.
The first says some shocking things about your ethics (no surprises there, however) and the second, beh!
Math will squeak about my 'sense of persecution' but it ain't paranoia if they really *are* out to get you! Remember your cabal and your 'jokey' website? (Try a bit of empathy, how'd you feel if *you* were the target? I can guaran-damn-tee (as they say in Sports Entertainment) you wouldn't just shrug it off!
If you mature, rather than just growing old, maybe one day you'll feel a sense of shame about it. But I'm not counting on it.
The God(s) Thread
badger party tony party green party Posted Jan 29, 2008
Della people laughing at youis not persecution.
People bruning you house down and poisoning your water supply or denying you gainful employment for no good reason that is persection why not try and get a sense of perspective eh?
I asked you days ago if you'd drop the past I stayed well clear and come back to find you dredging it up in a dishonest and inflammatory way.
The facts are you issued death threats against me. this is an unddeniable fact. Another undeniable fact is that you started two threads falsley of accussing me of hacking you dead brother's Uspace.
You have never apologized for either of these things without adding the caveats that, although I didnt do the farmer it was the kind of thing I woudl do and that's why you accussed me (I do not know how and wouldnt wish to hack your dea brother's account) and that when you issued death threats against me it was somehow *my fault* you did.
"(Try a bit of empathy, how'd you feel if *you* were the target? I can guaran-damn-tee (as they say in Sports Entertainment) you wouldn't just shrug it off!
As you well know I dont need to try any empathy I have been subject to racist abuse from you and poorly formed attempts at humour about my sexuality from your son on several of his sockpuppet accounts. So I KNOW what its like to be a "target".
As it happens I do shrug it off and only bring such things up to counter point your deceitful attempts to cast yourself as some kind of innocent victim of a campaign of hate from atheists.
You seek us out and post your nasty bigoted opinions and expect not to get called on them because you throw up the defence that your opinions are bible sanctioned.
This is an idiotic way to carry on if you dont like the treatment you have had so far. Still if you cant get enough of it when i have more time I'll be back to dish up more of it for you.
Bye for now Della!
The God(s) Thread
DA ; Simply Vicky: Don't get pithy with me! Posted Jan 30, 2008
Blicky, that post was addressed to azahar, not you.
<>
That's nonesense, and you know it, though you've maintained the same bizarre lie for 4 years. Maybe your ego depends on your being *that* important!
<<. Another undeniable fact is that you started two threads falsley of accussing me of hacking you dead brother's Uspace.>>
Because I thought you had done it.
<>
Rubbish, though you'd *like* to believe it.
<< So I KNOW what its like to be a "target".>>
Once again, the post wasn't addressed to you.
You say 'bey bye'... is there any chance you really mean it? Please?
The sad thing is, you're probably a good person, you've just got this big chip on your shoulder and want to believe *I* did these things to you! It justifies so much, after all!
Vicky
The God(s) Thread
Peckish Posted Jan 30, 2008
Lurking occasionally I find it difficult to isolate what it is that TAFKAD does that so infuriates.... is it the trite posts consisting as they do of "that's right", "Iagree". "hmm you put it so much better than I could" or is it the ones that have a majority of re quoting someone else's words and then dismissing them out of hand or is it those that are just derogatory?
I once thought that the worst thing about TAFKAD was the bitter and twisted denial of being wrong or simply mistaken and the inability to recognise that, admit it and let civilised discussion move on. Then I thought it was a basic defensiveness that read everything through that prism and heard all that was written as an attack. Then I thought the greatest failing was a massive ability to MISREAD people - so many times TAFKAD has just gone completly off on a tangent sooooo unrelated to the posters meaning- just about everyone else recognises what was meant AND in what spirit but NOT TAFKAD.
NOW... I don't care, well apart from giving this region a bad reputation... hey folks don't judge us by TAFKAD
Anyway the next post hopefully gives some context to recent claims.... you might want to copy cause it may not be around long.
... all the best I admire your questioning, honesty, forebearence and care..
regards, peckish
Hidden
Peckish Posted Jan 30, 2008
Interesting it was almost immediately "yikesed" and yet what it basically contained was a factual account of the circumstances involving the "death threat " incident.
An account that contradicts TAFKAD account that it all was a "lie". Strangely the original is still there.
Why was this rebuttal of TAFKAD's assertion removed?
curious....P
Hidden
Peckish Posted Jan 30, 2008
perhaps this will jog a memory or two...
"At the risk of repeating what Natalie has previously said, we have discussed this offsite with Della and with those Researchers who complained about the situation via the complaints system. I think Della now understands what actually happened here and knows that this kind of behaviour, no matter what the believed provocation or related circumstances, is unacceptable. Likewise, Blickybadger has made his position very clear in an eloquent and mature post to this very thread."
from Smij, who to quoteis " I was an h2g2 staff-member from 2002-2006, one of the Editor-type people who work on h2g2,"
...Peckish
The God(s) Thread
azahar Posted Jan 30, 2008
<>
Wow, she finally admits to making threats!
<>
Math? Squeak? Don't think so. And it wasn't anything as grand as a website, as you well know. It was a series of satirical photos created by six7s that he posted on his Fotki, based on someone called Apple who was making a fool of herself on hootoo at the time.
You know, there's no point in changing your name if you don't also change your behaviour. The 'Sword of Dellacles' was a jokey (and rather clever, if I say so myself) response to your most recent recurring threat. If you don't like it, then don't threaten people. Simple.
Meanwhile, it's hardly *persecution* or *bullying* to poke fun at someone's absurd behaviour, especially when they insist on presenting themselves in this manner in public.
az
The God(s) Thread
Matholwch - Brythonic Tribal Polytheist Posted Jan 30, 2008
Hi Vicky,
<> etcetera, etcetera.
You forget that we were here...
<>
No it isn't, but they weren't. You should understand that I actually had to set up an offsite group to help those that you, your son and JtP so thoroughly upset with your various nasty antics.
<>
And again with the vicious little asides. I have know Az a lot longer than you and have always found her to be pleasant, accepting, wise and loving.
I take it then that you are rejecting Blicky's call for peace?
And don't think I haven't noticed that you once again have ignored my reasonably put questions about scripture. Does this mean that you no longer wish to participate in the discussions on this thread?
One last note on persecution. You are not persecuted if you can simply walk away with no consequence. You can do this here but choose not to.
Blessings,
Matholwch .
Key: Complain about this post
Not worth the pain
- 26841: Matholwch - Brythonic Tribal Polytheist (Jan 26, 2008)
- 26842: Matholwch - Brythonic Tribal Polytheist (Jan 26, 2008)
- 26843: U10920173 (Jan 26, 2008)
- 26844: ÅçïÐßåth© H2G2-you can check out but you'll never leave! (Jan 26, 2008)
- 26845: Noggin the Nog (Jan 26, 2008)
- 26846: badger party tony party green party (Jan 27, 2008)
- 26847: U10939747 (Jan 29, 2008)
- 26848: astrolog (Jan 29, 2008)
- 26849: azahar (Jan 29, 2008)
- 26850: DA ; Simply Vicky: Don't get pithy with me! (Jan 29, 2008)
- 26851: badger party tony party green party (Jan 29, 2008)
- 26852: DA ; Simply Vicky: Don't get pithy with me! (Jan 30, 2008)
- 26853: U10939747 (Jan 30, 2008)
- 26854: Peckish (Jan 30, 2008)
- 26855: Peckish (Jan 30, 2008)
- 26856: Peckish (Jan 30, 2008)
- 26857: Peckish (Jan 30, 2008)
- 26858: azahar (Jan 30, 2008)
- 26859: Matholwch - Brythonic Tribal Polytheist (Jan 30, 2008)
- 26860: DA ; Simply Vicky: Don't get pithy with me! (Jan 30, 2008)
More Conversations for Talking About the Guide - the h2g2 Community
Write an Entry
"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is a wholly remarkable book. It has been compiled and recompiled many times and under many different editorships. It contains contributions from countless numbers of travellers and researchers."