h2g2 The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy: Earth Edition

Entry: The Brittas Empire - The TV Series - A720389
Author: Researcher PSG [Minister of Impossibility and Improbability] - Peace! [Scout] - U110126

Hello

I've got to the point where I can't really think of what else to do with this entry. Any thought?

Researcher PSG

You know, I can't think of anything to add either.

Thanks

I remember this - superb at first, but increasingly hit and miss as time went on. I've a couple of suggestions -

Would it be possible to have a "quotes" section - the wit and wisdom of Gordon Brittas? Also, weren't there a number of massive continuity problems - I think he has twins in the first series who vanish completely. Or did I imagine that?

Good work!

Otto

Brilliant series, brilliant entry
Can't find much fault really. All I think you need to do is change the first word to "a" and... nope that's it.
Just out of my own personal curiousity, what series was it that he died, and then came back ('cos they didn't want him in heaven)?
Oberon2001

Hello

I'm glad everyone so far seems so happy with the entry.

But the points that have been raised I will try to answer:

There isn't a contenuity error with the twins, the twins occured around the middle series (Given birth to by Helen in a bed in the middle of the high street tended by junior medical staff in fancy dress who had been pushing the bed for charity, if I remember correctly)

I think it was series 6 he came back from the dead, but I might be wrong.


I'll see if I can come up with quotes that stand up on their own, but I'm not sure I will find ones that work as text only.

erm..I think thats everything.

Researcher PSG

p.s. oh and I changed the An to an A.

The first sentence of the first and second section aren't proper sentences, they're phrases. They need to be joined to the following sentences by a comma. If this makes the sentences too long, then they need to be restructured.

Hello

Sorry I don't see the problem. They are the controlling ideas or claims of the paragraph. So if it's all the same I would rather leave this one to the sub, as I think I would end up doing more harm than good hacking around a problem I don't see.

Researcher PSG

What me knock an entry to the top of peer review, never.

Researcher PSG

One or two stray apostraphes and grammar bits, but I'm sure a sub will find them

very well written. i loved the series. i noticed a few grammatical and spelling errors, but nothing too major. good luck.

Thanks Kerr and Lord Nigel

Researcher PSG

Your Guide Entry has just been picked from Peer Review by one of our Scouts, and is now heading off into the Editorial Process, which ends with publication in the Edited Guide. We've therefore moved this Review Conversation out of Peer Review and to the entry itself.

If you'd like to know what happens now, check out the page on 'What Happens after your Entry has been Recommended?' at EditedGuide-Process. We hope this explains everything.

Thanks for contributing to the Edited Guide!

Well done, Researcher PSG! Fab entry

Thanks

Researcher PSG