A Conversation for Why Eomando?
Why not?
Eomando (it is it is it is 2 years now!!! 8-) ) Posted Jan 25, 2000
Very, very, amazingly, totally, utterly and completely boring. I had double biology first, which always seems to take far longer than it should do...then I almost fell asleep in physics (I wonder why), after having nothing to do for the previous 3 hours (inc. lunch)
How was uni?
Why not?
Dancing Ermine Posted Jan 25, 2000
I fell asleep during the morning , then spent all afternoon here.
I did get a response from Peta though She saw my chat-up lines page and will be sending more people that way.
Why not?
Eomando (it is it is it is 2 years now!!! 8-) ) Posted Jan 25, 2000
Good
It might be nice to hear some good ones for a change
At least *you* could sleep this morning - lucky bugger
Why not?
Dancing Ermine Posted Jan 25, 2000
There's one there now. it's cumbersome to put in though.
Why not?
Dancing Ermine Posted Jan 25, 2000
I just checked, It's on the fornt page!!!!!!!
My first entry to get a mention there!!!!!
I'm excited!!!!!!!
Can you tell!!!!!!!!
Why not?
Dancing Ermine Posted Jan 25, 2000
The day I arrived, 14 1/2 weeks ago. I expect it has gone to the subbing process at the moment. The articles approved for today are about 200 ahead in the entry numbers but, as not everyone submits those articles and homepages also count, it shouldn't be too much longer, hopefully.
Why not?
Dancing Ermine Posted Jan 25, 2000
Peta told someone else that the queue's down to about ten weeks, with the new deputy editor working now and they're thinking of expanding the five-a-day guarantee to get through more entries. Which means some of my other articles shouldn't have to wait as long. Christmas probably didn't help getting them moved through. But I'm not too bothered so long as they get seen within the year.
Why not?
Dancing Ermine Posted Jan 25, 2000
So am I which is why I'm relaxed about it. Compare that to one person who was waiting 7 1/2 _months_ for an entry to be seen.
Why not?
Eomando (it is it is it is 2 years now!!! 8-) ) Posted Jan 25, 2000
That's a *very* long time...
Why not?
Dancing Ermine Posted Jan 25, 2000
There were complaints. Which is how I found out. They lost it in moving offices or something.
Why not?
Eomando (it is it is it is 2 years now!!! 8-) ) Posted Jan 25, 2000
I'm not surprised after that amount of time.
Why not?
Dancing Ermine Posted Jan 25, 2000
People appear to get antsy around 18-20 weeks or when their later entries get approved first.
Key: Complain about this post
Why not?
- 161: Eomando (it is it is it is 2 years now!!! 8-) ) (Jan 25, 2000)
- 162: Dancing Ermine (Jan 25, 2000)
- 163: Eomando (it is it is it is 2 years now!!! 8-) ) (Jan 25, 2000)
- 164: Dancing Ermine (Jan 25, 2000)
- 165: Dancing Ermine (Jan 25, 2000)
- 166: Eomando (it is it is it is 2 years now!!! 8-) ) (Jan 25, 2000)
- 167: Dancing Ermine (Jan 25, 2000)
- 168: Eomando (it is it is it is 2 years now!!! 8-) ) (Jan 25, 2000)
- 169: Dancing Ermine (Jan 25, 2000)
- 170: J'au-æmne (Jan 25, 2000)
- 171: Dancing Ermine (Jan 25, 2000)
- 172: J'au-æmne (Jan 25, 2000)
- 173: Dancing Ermine (Jan 25, 2000)
- 174: Eomando (it is it is it is 2 years now!!! 8-) ) (Jan 25, 2000)
- 175: Dancing Ermine (Jan 25, 2000)
- 176: Eomando (it is it is it is 2 years now!!! 8-) ) (Jan 25, 2000)
- 177: Dancing Ermine (Jan 25, 2000)
- 178: Eomando (it is it is it is 2 years now!!! 8-) ) (Jan 25, 2000)
- 179: Dancing Ermine (Jan 25, 2000)
- 180: Eomando (it is it is it is 2 years now!!! 8-) ) (Jan 25, 2000)
More Conversations for Why Eomando?
Write an Entry
"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is a wholly remarkable book. It has been compiled and recompiled many times and under many different editorships. It contains contributions from countless numbers of travellers and researchers."