A Conversation for The Iraq Conflict Discussion Forum
War Crimes?
starbirth Posted Jul 16, 2003
I have not posted on this thread for about three weeks. However is sure is heart warming after an absence to see you all playing together so well.
A choir is so much more gratifying when they are all in harmony.
War Crimes?
DA ; Simply Vicky: Don't get pithy with me! Posted Jul 17, 2003
I heard Abouzaid, successor to Tommy Franks, on the WS this morning, acknowledging that the Iraq occupation *has turned* into another Vietnam! Will he be in trouble for saying that?
War Crimes?
Empty Sky (Remember me fondly.) Posted Jul 17, 2003
"However is sure is heart warming after an absence to see you all playing together so well."
It's pleasing to see that you're (slowly) coming around to a sensible point of view.
War Crimes?
Empty Sky (Remember me fondly.) Posted Jul 17, 2003
"Will he be in trouble for saying that?"
I should think so. It's very hard to be objective in America these days, for fear of being called unpatriotic. That's how effectively Bush has twisted the truth.
Even the democrats in the senate, however, are now saying that they feel conned and they regret backing the war.
War Crimes?
purplejenny Posted Jul 17, 2003
I was going to have a one minute rant about this at the one minute rant page, but then
The one minute rant I'd have about war I think is revolutionay and moderateble so I'll just leave this link.
http://www.voy.com/65982/70.html
This is an illegal occupation of Iraq, looks set to continue and ought to stop. The total abscence of WMD undermines there reason to be there. So why are they there? UK troops out by September.
http://www.cafeshops.com/warposter/47540
War Crimes?
Empty Sky (Remember me fondly.) Posted Jul 18, 2003
Yes. Pro-war, imperialist, Bush-worshippers are finding it harder and harder to justify their stance these days and are getting rather desperate.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3072221.stm
War Crimes?
DA ; Simply Vicky: Don't get pithy with me! Posted Jul 18, 2003
Excellent links, Purplejenny! (Especially the Bill O'Reilly one). The guy who called him excrement was not wrong!
War Crimes?
Jimmy Nugget (I am extremely happy for everybody, especially miss Fiona.) Posted Jul 18, 2003
It's the human need to always be right, otherwise they'd admit they were wrong. That's why Blair refuses to admit he was wrong. That need manifests differently in Bush. Maybe because he's not entirely human! (Sorry, couldn't resist.)
War Crimes?
Dryopithecus Posted Jul 19, 2003
What I can't understand is why so many people now say they were mislead by the spin. I'm not talking about your average tabloid reading idiot, but the many apparently intelligent politicians who now say they were mislead. Either they're not as intelligent as they think they are, or they believed that, since Saddam was evil, everything he said was a lie, or both. It is true that Tony Blair is a highly skilled confidence trickster and Bush has a fine line in evangelical rhetoric, but it wasn't hard to see through them, was it?
Dry.
War Crimes?
Empty Sky (Remember me fondly.) Posted Jul 19, 2003
"What I can't understand is why so many people now say they were mislead by the spin."
In Tony Blair's case I have come to the conclusion that he never really believed the bollocks he's been talking but he took Britain to war because he knew that war was inevitable and believed that it was necessary to appease Washington. As if that wasn't bad enough, he continues to insult the public's intelligence by saying he still believes the invasion was just.
In the case of the Americans who fell for the spin (I know I'll be criticised for saying this) Americans really do believe (perhaps even subconsciously) that their countrymen are morally superior, that their leaders would never lie to them and that their nation can do no wrong. The fact that such belief ammounts to belief in a master-race and that history has repeatedly shown it to be nonsense, seems to have no effect on their delusion. And so it continues.
America arrogantly believes that it alone has the right to run unchecked programs of WMDs and that it alone sits in moral judgement over the rest of the world. While this arrogance exists, America wil continue to act with impunity. Might is right (apparantly).
War Crimes?
Empty Sky (Remember me fondly.) Posted Jul 19, 2003
"I learned that Ronald Reagan was an animatronic."
A seriously defective one, obviously.
War Crimes?
Lentilla (Keeper of Non-Sequiturs) Posted Jul 19, 2003
> In the case of the Americans who fell for the spin (I know I'll be criticised for saying this) Americans really do believe (perhaps even subconsciously) that their countrymen are morally superior, that their leaders would never lie to them and that their nation can do no wrong. The fact that such belief ammounts to belief in a master-race and that history has repeatedly shown it to be nonsense, seems to have no effect on their delusion. And so it continues.
You trying to start something, Empty? I do dislike these blanket statements - they make judgements about a group of people, when the reality is that *all* the Americans I know are scared s**tless about the current state of the government. We have no faith in our leaders, and are seriously worried how these current events will damage future relations with other nations. The truth is, anybody that runs for President that isn't frothing at the mouth will have at least 40% of the vote, hands down.
I get the impression that nobody 'fell' for the spin. The people that knew what was going on promoted the war as a patriotic effort, in hopes that the dumb rednecks would jump on the bandwagon and wave their little plastic flags. But everybody knew that the Republicans were telling lies and distorting the truth - the Democrats tried to obstruct the war and got labeled as cowards, while the Republicans knew they were being lied to and didn't care - the end justified the means, in their opinion.
So the media, largely bipartisan and middle of the road (except for conservative Fox) tried to cover what they perceived as American enthusiasm for the war. So this has ended up as being a big intelligence mess, all the way 'round.
War Crimes?
DA ; Simply Vicky: Don't get pithy with me! Posted Jul 20, 2003
Lentilla, I have to side with Empty on this one - although I know of frustrated and angry Americans like you, who opposed the war and see right through the plastic flag waving. Dubya obviously believes that the 40% he'll get can be made to be enough!
Blair is facing an enquiry - what does Dubya have to worry about, especially with Ari Flesheater (thanks for the name by the way) going on Letterman and shouting spite, so that even Dave remarked that it was as if he'd never left the job!
War Crimes?
Empty Sky (Remember me fondly.) Posted Jul 20, 2003
"I get the impression that nobody 'fell' for the spin."
Lentilla, I wish that was true. But if it was, the invasion would never have happened. You mention "dumb rednecks waving their little plastic flags". What is that if it's not falling for the spin?
Your realism is refreshing to see. But I'm afraid that you're in a minority. The majority of Americans remain stupidly, blindly patriotic.
Since the war began I've spoken to Americans who firstly believed the lies emanating from the Bush administration, then when that was no longer possible they reluctantly acknowledged the lies but actually defended Bush's right to lie to them. Now (perhaps most incredibly of all) they're hoping it'll all just blow away and saying that they intend to vote for Bush again. What is all that if it's not stupid, irrational, patriotic denial?
It's certain that Bush couldn't be happier about this blind jingoism. It gifts him the easy impunity he needs for his vile evil acts.
The flag makes a convenient blindfold.
War Crimes?
DA ; Simply Vicky: Don't get pithy with me! Posted Jul 20, 2003
<<Since the war began I've spoken to Americans who firstly believed the lies emanating from the Bush administration, then when that was no longer possible they reluctantly acknowledged the lies but actually defended Bush's right to lie to them. <<
They defend his right to lie to them? That's appalling! Mind, I did hear from people who simply said, 'Oh, just accept that Bush/Blair know things we don't, and that makes it all right!
Hidden
DA ; Simply Vicky: Don't get pithy with me! Posted Jul 20, 2003
Interesting! Who, what, when and where?
Key: Complain about this post
War Crimes?
- 7201: starbirth (Jul 16, 2003)
- 7202: DA ; Simply Vicky: Don't get pithy with me! (Jul 17, 2003)
- 7203: Empty Sky (Remember me fondly.) (Jul 17, 2003)
- 7204: Empty Sky (Remember me fondly.) (Jul 17, 2003)
- 7205: purplejenny (Jul 17, 2003)
- 7206: Apparition™ (Mourning Empty the best uncle anyone could wish for) (Jul 18, 2003)
- 7207: Empty Sky (Remember me fondly.) (Jul 18, 2003)
- 7208: Empty Sky (Remember me fondly.) (Jul 18, 2003)
- 7209: DA ; Simply Vicky: Don't get pithy with me! (Jul 18, 2003)
- 7210: Jimmy Nugget (I am extremely happy for everybody, especially miss Fiona.) (Jul 18, 2003)
- 7211: DA ; Simply Vicky: Don't get pithy with me! (Jul 18, 2003)
- 7212: Dryopithecus (Jul 19, 2003)
- 7213: Empty Sky (Remember me fondly.) (Jul 19, 2003)
- 7214: Empty Sky (Remember me fondly.) (Jul 19, 2003)
- 7215: Lentilla (Keeper of Non-Sequiturs) (Jul 19, 2003)
- 7216: DA ; Simply Vicky: Don't get pithy with me! (Jul 20, 2003)
- 7217: Empty Sky (Remember me fondly.) (Jul 20, 2003)
- 7218: DA ; Simply Vicky: Don't get pithy with me! (Jul 20, 2003)
- 7219: Charityplayer (Jul 20, 2003)
- 7220: DA ; Simply Vicky: Don't get pithy with me! (Jul 20, 2003)
More Conversations for The Iraq Conflict Discussion Forum
Write an Entry
"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is a wholly remarkable book. It has been compiled and recompiled many times and under many different editorships. It contains contributions from countless numbers of travellers and researchers."