A Conversation for Venus
Life on "GUTH Venus" (in spite of NASA)
BradGuth Started conversation Oct 15, 2002
GUTH Venus confirmed, most recently by Hubble, TRACE, ISS and even SOHO
It seems these fine observatory instruments, as situated outside our atmosphere and reporting no system failures are in fact entirely blind by their affiliation with NSA/DoD "nondisclosure" standards and protocol. In other words, if it were not for the under handed efforts of the "status quo", these instruments and even of those crew onboard ISS, all could be imaging upon Venus as never before (at least not for another 18+ months worth).
This October/November, Venus is going to become a mere 105 times further away then our moon. That's darn close and it's not even crossing the solar image (like Hubble's imaging upon Mercury and even SOHO's Mercury imaging as it directly crossed the sun), at least not as such being all that complicated from the perspective of any good space platform instruments and then obviously, the ISS crew could certainly view this large object and even communicate via xenon/laser with great ease.
Being so close, Earth's solar reflection is sufficient as to illuminate a sufficient degree of those highly light reflective Venus clouds, where instruments onboard TRACE and certainly Hubble could pull vital atmospheric data from imaging upon Venus. TRACE could safely image through the atmosphere of the solar created crescent, where that capture alone is worth tonnes to any true astronomer. The exceptional CCD contrast range aboard TRACE, that along with selected filters could maintain a rather significant degree of observations as for any sort of artificial illuminations, hopefully as binary packets but any such illuminations would certainly be artificial.
The capability of Hubble means that for several weeks, viewing Venus is a rather simple and safe task, as 4.25% of the Venus diameter can be captured by Hubble, thus eliminating any solar or even Venus Crescent areas from Hubble's CCD (which could with filters tolerate such intrusions if necessary).
Unlike observing Venus through Earth's polluted atmosphere, where Venus is simply too close to the sun, in space there's no such compromise, as the sun represents a crisp bright target and, at a fraction of a degree away is nearly pitch black darkness unless there's massive solar flares taking place.
So, I have a few questions that others should be asking of NASA and perhaps ESA.
1) Where's that Boeing/TRW laser cannon these days?
2) What's with all the deep space observations when Venus is so freaking near?
3) What imaging logs (time-lines) are there upon Hubble, TRACE, SOHO and ISS?
4) Good Earth based observatories can image Venus, so what's not happening?
5) Existing Earth based lasers and xenon beams exist, so what's their status?
6) When searching for current logs regarding anything Venus, since 21 months ago and seemingly there's nothing whatsoever now nor scheduled in the future, in spite of the massive numbers of highly artificial content issues which my research has exposed (that's also in spite of all the official e-flak), so "where's the latest beef on Venus"?
7) If others have not been able to deliver one iota of similar observational considerations (as from any planet including Earth) that which demonstrates how such artificial looking formations could be so natural, let alone are in fact anything but artificial, then what's all the fuss over my research and subsequent discoveries?
8) If the atmosphere of Venus is absolutely crystal clear and those clouds are somewhat transparent as to near UV as well as UV-A and UV-B spectrums, then what's stopping a good xenon/laser beam from illuminating their otherwise totally pitch black sky?
Any good nocturnal sort (having a magnitude 5+ capability, 10 being within evolutionary capability) couldn't possibly ignore such illuminations and, their having access to the natural energies of Venus (CO2-->CO/O2 and vertical CO2 wind power) plus the access as to acquiring H2O and thereby developing H2O2 and then just plain old H2 is not even rocket science), thus xenon illumination could easily be generated. With such energies and some rather incredible buoyancy's at hand, foot, claw or tentacle should be more then capable as for achieving massive airship attitudes that would place their astronomers above those cool nighttime clouds, perhaps a mere 20 km above their surface as during their extended season of nighttime, but as capable of obtaining 75 km if push comes to shove, as those available energies as from CO/O2 are truly enormous (like potentially ISP's of 260+), not to mention what a little H2O2 could contribute.
Within many other pages, I've explained how such buoyancy works greatly to their advantage, I've covered the O2-->CO/O2 factor that includes bleed-off air conditioning attributes, I've discovered and shared the Vertical CO2 windpower issue and subsequently explained how a tough as nails sort of lizard folk would have applied such attributes if their world were becoming greenhouse, like using insulation spheres of H2 or N2 that could easily obtain R-200 (that's 0.5% hourly loss or gain of BTU's depending upon your understanding) and even of pyrex triple barrier windows offering R-50 would not be technically out of bounds.
The main discovery site includes a fair number of massive structures of complex reservoirs (nothing as limited nor pathetic as any Mars face), other symmetrical buildings, a sufficient tarmac w/service bays and equipment on deck, various round and parabolic issues, spherical tanks as well as symmetrically and parallel aligned and did I mention, the freaking suspension bridge that any fool can see what's underneath, plus don't forget about that nifty "fluid arch" consideration, nor those quarry sites, the switch-back roads and assortments of various other rectangular issues associated with such passage and infrastructure considerations.
Of course, all of the expected natural rugged features of recorded tectonics, rilles and canyons, associated erosions and of what ever else makes up Venus are in fact surrounding these more likely artificial then not issues, where all this natural stuff is equally enlarged upon but not being contrived nor distorted by the photo software into anything other, in fact, from thousands of other images enlarged, there seems no other indications of false artificial considerations other then of those more likely artificial considerations as at the three recorded "GUTH Venus" sites, and I can prove that far more easily then my opposition can prove otherwise. Besides, what ulterior motive could I possibly have that's anything up against the NASA/NSA/DoD ruse of the century, the scam of all shams, the ultimate lie upon steroids. My ulterior motive is discovering "truth" and seeing that we focus upon humanly obtainable goals and of especially those which our current technology has to offer, thus no new moneys nor risk and, certainly nothing ethnic nor political based, at least not until NSA/DoD get involved and that's perhaps including yourself, then in no time we'll have those heathen Islamic lizard folks from Venus breathing down our necks or perhaps guiding big airships or other through our tallest buildings again. In fact, if our crack NSA/DoD wizards try heard enough, perhaps Venus will have to try out some new bio-tactical weapon, just so as to put us out of our self-inflicted misery (sort of like how we exterminate termites or roaches).
Sorry if I believe our NASA/NSA/DoD have been and are still in the toilet, but that's a fact of our American way of life, being selfishly irregardless of whatever consequences, as our crack wizards of "disinformation" and focussed goals of ruling the universe is truly pathetic and, I believe down right criminal. So, if my opposition wants to play along with the "status quo", my advice is to not stand to near to these jokers and especially stay out of tall buildings and don't fly if you don't have to, as NSA/DoD are pushing a number of buttons, of which they have no idea as to the consequences, or perhaps they do, they just don't give a dam anymore, as long as it's not their butt...
Of course, as my opposition, you can remain totally arrogant, unresponsive, intentionally obstructive and thus further proving that as bad as I believe NASA/NSA/DoD have been, that your fine upstanding example is something far worse and more sinister then of anything those al-Qaida or bin-Laden has to offer. At least those Islamic's have their reasons based upon some rather obvious provocation by others that we have elected to back, as they certainly didn't have to perpetrate and subsequently create their enemies, especially when we certainly did a damn fine job of accomplishing that one all by ourselves.
Regards, Brad Guth / IEIS http://guthvenus.tripod.com and http://geocities.com/bradguth
Life on "GUTH Venus" (in spite of NASA)
Cefpret Posted Oct 15, 2002
You flood my personal space with tons of characters. Could you please explain to me in up to three sentences what it is all about?
Key: Complain about this post