A Conversation for Ask h2g2
how can we measure "male perfection"?
? Started conversation Jan 25, 2001
In the "British English"-thread, it has been "decided" that female beauty can be measured by the "Helen" (milli-Helen, kilo-Helen, even micro-Helen), in honour of Helen of Troy, the "face that launched a thousand ships"� Since then ("British English"-thread at http://www.h2g2.com/F19585?thread=46483, posting 3431), a search has been going on to find a male equivalent. These have already been rejected (for various reasons): - Sean Connery - Adonis - Narcissus - Russell Crowe - Hector - Ajax - Ulysses - Paris - the-one-who-could-sink-a-thousand-pints - Alan Titchmarsh - Willy Wonka - Gilgamesh - Al Bundy However, this quest does not belong in the "British English"-thread. So, please, h2g2-community, help us out�
how can we measure "male perfection"?
Sho - employed again! Posted Jan 25, 2001
Personal preferance would be the Jackson (as in Dr. Daniel from Stargate)
He is, lets face it, gorgeous, and has a brain the size of a planet.
*Swoons*
Sho
how can we measure "male perfection"?
? Posted Jan 25, 2001
The problem with the "Jackson" is it can be pisinterpreted (Michael anyone?)
No, it has to be somebody that is mythical, legendary, knwon to everybody, and it has been proposed there has to be a measure of heroics and creativity...
Moreover, e.g. milli-Jackson is too confusing...
how can we measure "male perfection"?
Gnomon - time to move on Posted Jan 25, 2001
The original search for perfection was based on the fact that if Helen (of Troy) had a face which could launch a thousand ships, then one millihelen would be enough beauty to launch just one ship.
Is there anything similar for men?
how can we measure "male perfection"?
Nikki-D Posted Jan 25, 2001
Yes, but our reasoning (in Britsih English) had been that the 'perfect' male would have to combine such qualities and pedigree that a mere 20th century actor could not aspire to ... something classic and heroic (among other things).
We've had some Greeks (and similar) and a Persian so far ... any others ?
how can we measure "male perfection"?
? Posted Jan 25, 2001
I compiled the list (of rejects) in the first posting.
how can we measure "male perfection"?
Sho - employed again! Posted Jan 25, 2001
Then if you want to keep the launching the 1000 ships thing, you'd have to pick someone historical who could "launch" 1000 soldiers or something.
my new recommendation (although from personal preference I will always use a Jackson ) is Hannibal
how can we measure "male perfection"?
Sho - employed again! Posted Jan 25, 2001
Look, sorry if this has been said in the other thread but I'm short of time here:
the question is: "how can we measure Male perfection?"
there is only one answer to that: ROFL
how can we measure "male perfection"?
Is mise Duncan Posted Jan 25, 2001
"I don't mind how you measure male perfection, so long as its measured metric" - The EU
"I don't mind how you measure male perfection, so long as its measured in pounds and ounces" - An Englishman
how can we measure "male perfection"?
Sho - employed again! Posted Jan 25, 2001
Sorry. It is the one and only time I have seen a legitimate use of the Internet Acronym: Rolls On Floor Laughing
Usually I steer away from these (there is a thread about annoying phrases, to which these belong) but I thought in this case it was both appropriate and witty. Something which happens to me but rarely. True to form, it fell flat on its face.
Thanks a bunch
Life, don't talk to me about life!
Sho
how can we measure "male perfection"?
? Posted Jan 25, 2001
I'll interpret that as "a need for a sense of humour" (I agree it's an annoying phrase).
Does the acronym for "Babe In Total Control of Herself" qualify? You must admit a "Helen" sounds a LOT nicer...
(sorry about that acronym, it's atypical of me, I promise. )
how can we measure "male perfection"?
Sho - employed again! Posted Jan 25, 2001
You obviously don't need any extra sense of humour. It is just soooooooo overused, I think there is a discussion about it here somewhere (in fact I'm pretty sure there is)
how can we measure "male perfection"?
Nikki-D Posted Jan 25, 2001
'There is a general feeling ("it is thought that" - see BritEng post 3310 onwards) in the feminine community that the male of the species is typically one-dimensional, and thus should be pretty easy to measure'
Discuss.
how can we measure "male perfection"?
? Posted Jan 25, 2001
I have learned (NOT the hard way, don't worry) not to contradict the "general feelings" of the "feminine community", and to follow their advice.
But how come we're still searching for it, if it was THAT easy to measure?
how can we measure "male perfection"?
Gnomon - time to move on Posted Jan 25, 2001
If the female community consider male perfection to be one dimensional, and Duncan the Englishman wants it imperial, why not combine the two and measure it in inches? Can you achieve the perfect 6 from all the judges?
how can we measure "male perfection"?
Kaeori Posted Jan 25, 2001
I'm sorry to come back to this, but I don't think we should be incorporating intelligence, bravery or the like into this measure.
To be compatible with the 'Helen', we need only to concern ourselves with the man's looks - specifically, his face.
(You can find other measures for judging physique - an Arnie perhap - nobility, chivalry, etc.)
Did we have a 'Paris'?
how can we measure "male perfection"?
? Posted Jan 25, 2001
I proposed a "Paris", but it got rejected as being too "French"...
how can we measure "male perfection"?
Sho - employed again! Posted Jan 25, 2001
Paris was, when it came down to it, a big girls' blouse.
How about Hercules? (no no no - now I have this image of Kevin Szorbo, who whilst not ugly puts me off somehow)
And the thing about 6 inches reminds me of the joke, which can only be done visually, so I can't really write it here, which is making everyone wonder why I started this... in fact I'm wondering myself.
Oh heck.
Key: Complain about this post
how can we measure "male perfection"?
- 1: ? (Jan 25, 2001)
- 2: Sho - employed again! (Jan 25, 2001)
- 3: ? (Jan 25, 2001)
- 4: Gnomon - time to move on (Jan 25, 2001)
- 5: Nikki-D (Jan 25, 2001)
- 6: ? (Jan 25, 2001)
- 7: Sho - employed again! (Jan 25, 2001)
- 8: Sho - employed again! (Jan 25, 2001)
- 9: Is mise Duncan (Jan 25, 2001)
- 10: ? (Jan 25, 2001)
- 11: Sho - employed again! (Jan 25, 2001)
- 12: ? (Jan 25, 2001)
- 13: Sho - employed again! (Jan 25, 2001)
- 14: ? (Jan 25, 2001)
- 15: Nikki-D (Jan 25, 2001)
- 16: ? (Jan 25, 2001)
- 17: Gnomon - time to move on (Jan 25, 2001)
- 18: Kaeori (Jan 25, 2001)
- 19: ? (Jan 25, 2001)
- 20: Sho - employed again! (Jan 25, 2001)
More Conversations for Ask h2g2
Write an Entry
"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is a wholly remarkable book. It has been compiled and recompiled many times and under many different editorships. It contains contributions from countless numbers of travellers and researchers."