A Conversation for Miscellaneous Chat

The Fibonacci Series

Post 161

Marjin, After a long time of procrastination back lurking

F(135) = 7,308,805,952,221,443,105,020,355,490

The difference in the smiley - cdouble is in the previous error.


The Fibonacci Series

Post 162

Bagpuss

F(136)=11,825,896,447,871,834,976,429,068,427 (I hope)


The Fibonacci Series

Post 163

Marjin, After a long time of procrastination back lurking

F(137) = 19,134,702,400,093,278,081,449,423,917

Don't Panic, it is.smiley - smiley


The Fibonacci Series

Post 164

Bagpuss

F(138)=30,960,598,847,965,113,057,878,492,344

There'd be fewer mistakes if we just let you do them all, Marjin.


The Fibonacci Series

Post 165

GTBacchus

F(139) = 50,095,301,248,058,391,139,327,916,261


The Fibonacci Series

Post 166

Researcher Eagle 1

F(140) = 81,055,900,096,023,504,197,206,408,605


The Fibonacci Series

Post 167

GTBacchus

F(141) = 131,151,201,344,081,895,336,534,324,866


The Fibonacci Series

Post 168

Marjin, After a long time of procrastination back lurking

F(142) = 212,207,101,440,105,399,533,740,733,471

Keep adding some comments, or we will be called spammerssmiley - winkeye


The Fibonacci Series

Post 169

GTBacchus

F(143) = 343,358,302,784,187,294,870,275,058,337

I'm actually working on a Fibonacci Series related art project, if anyone's interested in hearing about it... smiley - geek/smiley - artist


The Fibonacci Series

Post 170

Bagpuss

F(144)=555,565,404,224,292,694,404,015,791,808

Do tell, GT.


The Fibonacci Series

Post 171

GTBacchus

F(145) = 898,923,707,008,479,989,274,290,850,145



Well, it has to do with something I mentioned on the last page, about how the final digits of numbers in the sequence repeat after a while. F(60) ends in a '0', and F(61) ends in a '1', so that's like starting back at the beginning, if you only look at the final digits. The sequence of final digits looks like:

0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 3, 1, . . ., 2, 9, 1, 0, . . .

...where that last '0' is just like the first one. There are a total of 60 terms. The thing is, some pairs of terms never occur. For example, you never have a '0' followed by another '0', because if you did, every term after those would end with a '0'. If you start with (0, 10) as your seeds, that's what you'd have for your series.

Less trivially, you never have the pair (0, 5) either. The seeds (0, 5) would lead to a series whose final digits repeated:

0, 5, 5, 0, 5, 5, 0, 5, 5, . . .

... over and over again.



to be continued...


The Fibonacci Series

Post 172

Dryopithecus

My calculator says 4181

smiley - lovesmiley - peacesign D.


The Fibonacci Series

Post 173

Dryopithecus

Sorry, ignore that - I missed 151 entries in the thread!

smiley - lovesmiley - peacesign D.


The Fibonacci Series

Post 174

Researcher Eagle 1

898,923,707,008,479,989,274,290,850,145

Hmm... wonder how long this can continue...


The Fibonacci Series

Post 175

Researcher Eagle 1

Oops, didn't see someone had already posted that one. smiley - blush


The Fibonacci Series

Post 176

Marjin, After a long time of procrastination back lurking

F(146) = 1,454,489,111,232,772,683,678,306,641,953

And another digit addedsmiley - smiley


The Fibonacci Series

Post 177

Bagpuss

F(146)=1,454,489,111,232,772,683,678,306,641,953

GT - There's 60 different pairings, counting (0,1) as different from (1,0). Do you get a nice pattern if you plot these or something?


The Fibonacci Series

Post 178

GTBacchus

F(147) = 2,353,412,818,241,252,672,952,597,492,098

"Do you get a nice pattern if you plot these or something?"


Well, you can make a grid, and plot those 60 pairings, maybe in some colour. Then you take a different seed, a pairing that doesn't show up among the 60, and see the cycle that it generates. (0,0) generates a trivial cycle, with 1 pairing. (0,5) generates a cycle with 3 pairings. (0,2) generates a 20-pairing cycle, containing only even numbers! Each of these cycles (there are 6 of them) can be plotted on the same grid in a different colour. How you choose the colours is another question.

Anyway, at some point, you realize that this is all based on the fact that we write our numerals in base 10. In different bases, you get different cycles of different lengths, and you draw differently sized grids with different patterns in them.

There are some neat correspondences across bases. Just looking at the cycles in base 10: the (0,5,5) sequence is just a multiple of the (0,1,1) sequence that appears in binary, and in every even base. Likewise, the 20-number cycle beginning with (0,2) is a multiple of a 20-number cycle beginning with (0,1) that shows up in base 5. Our original 60-number cycle doesn't show up in any smaller base, but it will be repeated in base 20, beginning with (0,2).

I think base 7 is my favourite. The 49 possible pairings are divided among 3 16-number cycles, plus the trivial case (0,0). It looks really good using black or white for the trivial one, and three metallic colours for the others. smiley - bigeyes


The Fibonacci Series

Post 179

Marjin, After a long time of procrastination back lurking

F(148) = 3,807,901,929,474,025,356,630,904,134,051

Have you seen this one in tha Mandelbrot-set?
http://math.bu.edu/DYSYS/FRACGEOM2/node7.html


The Fibonacci Series

Post 180

Mu Beta

F(149)=6,161,314,747,715,278,029,583,501,626,149

That picture looks remarkably like the edge of a cast-zinc surface (and I've seen a few...) - it's amazing where these numbers will find an outlet.

B


Key: Complain about this post