A Conversation for Miscellaneous Chat

The Fibonacci Series

Post 141

Bagpuss

F(118)=2,046,711,111,473,984,623,491,759

Error checking? Wozzat? smiley - winkeye


The Fibonacci Series

Post 142

Marjin, After a long time of procrastination back lurking

F(119) = 3,311,648,143,516,982,017,180,081

Trying to get the numbers following the original rule, instead of exchanging a 6 for a 4 when a previous number is incorrect.


The Fibonacci Series

Post 143

Prometeus



F(120)= 5,358,359,254,990,966,640,671,840

(to be continued...)


The Fibonacci Series

Post 144

Mu Beta

8,670,007,398,507,948,657,850,921

What really appals me is that 13 posts have been made in this thread with no approach to the correct Fibonacci number.

I blame the Powers.

B


The Fibonacci Series

Post 145

GTBacchus

F(122)=14,028,366,653,498,915,298,522,761

Fourteen septillion... Are we getting close to the end yet? smiley - winkeye Better yet, when do they turn around and start getting smaller again?


The Fibonacci Series

Post 146

Prometeus

F(123)=22,698,374,052,006,863,956,375,682


The Fibonacci Series

Post 147

Prometeus

F(124)=31,368,381,450,514,812,614,227,603


The Fibonacci Series

Post 148

GTBacchus

Here, that wasn't right. smiley - erm Should be:


F(124)=36,726,740,705,505,779,254,898,443

...or something to that effect.


The Fibonacci Series

Post 149

Prometeus

...or shouldn't it be:
F(124)=36,726,740,705,505,779,254,899,443

cause I was not sure about F(121).
LOL, I'm getting really crazy after this thread...


The Fibonacci Series

Post 150

GTBacchus

F(125)=59,425,114,757,512,643,211,274,125

Awww... the last 3 digits of F(125) are '125'. Isn't that cute?

smiley - popcorn

replying to Hoovooloo's post 37...

You can reach 471151 with seeds F(0)=541 and F(1)=143, which are smaller than his F(0)=753, F(1)=307. I'll bet his are the second smallest.

As far as algorithms, I'd say you take the number you want to have crop up in your series, and call it F(n). Then:

F(n-1) = round[F(n) * (phi - 1)]

or: = round[F(n) / phi]

...which amounts to the same thing

Once you have F(n) and F(n-1), you can work backwards easily until it blows up on you and you get a negative. (I guess you could keep working backwards then, but it doesn't feel very 'Fibonacci'.... whoever heard of someone trying to get -398 rabbits to breed?)


The Fibonacci Series

Post 151

GTBacchus

F(126)=96,151,855,463,018,422,466,173,568

Was it something I said? smiley - huh


The Fibonacci Series

Post 152

Giford

155,576,970,220,531,065,677,447,693

I need bigger Post-It notes ...

Gif smiley - geek


The Fibonacci Series

Post 153

Marjin, After a long time of procrastination back lurking

F(128) = 251.728.825.683.549.488.150.424.261

The numbers in the second and third triplets from the right have been in error for some time, so I'll give two numbers to set it right again.
F(127) should have ended with ....681.649.693

F(129) = 407.305.795.904.080.553.832.073.954


The Fibonacci Series

Post 154

GTBacchus

F(130) = 659,034,621,587,630,041,982,498,215

Marjin... how d'you do that? smiley - huh



BTW, the final digits follow a cycle that repeats every 60 steps, so:

F(N) = F(N+60) (mod 10)

...where that equal sign should really be a congruence sign.




Next poster breaks the octillion barrier!


The Fibonacci Series

Post 155

Mu Beta

OK, then...

F(131)=1,066,340,417,491,710,595,814,572,169

B


The Fibonacci Series

Post 156

Researcher Eagle 1

F(132) = 1,725,375,039,079,340,637,797,070,384

Warning: American attempting to hijack the thread again.

*evil laughter*


The Fibonacci Series

Post 157

Bagpuss

F(133)=2,791,715,456,571,051,234,611,642,553


The Fibonacci Series

Post 158

Marjin, After a long time of procrastination back lurking

smiley - laugh
F(134) = 4,517,090,495,650,391,871,408,712,937

Warning, Bagpuss' last number should have ended in: 233,611,642,553 smiley - yikes


The Fibonacci Series

Post 159

GTBacchus

F(134)=4,517,090,495,650,391,872,408,712,937


Number crunchin' in the USA!


The Fibonacci Series

Post 160

GTBacchus

well then, use Marjin's F(134), not mine.


Marjin, are you double checking our calculations, or do you have a list? Either way, I'm glad someone's keeping us honest.


Key: Complain about this post