h2g2 The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy: Earth Edition

Hello fellow chatters I am looking for a place to post information related the to discovery of very large prehistoric sea dragons (remains). We have a website dedicated to the Hallettestoneion Seazoria Dragons discovery. London England is the number one city hitting our dragon discovery website.

Dragon discussions is a completely new topic so we are wondering if anyone might be interested in in this subject. Also could someone advise me if is is possible to add a link to the Seazoria dragon website.

Ooh, I'd say your best bet could be to try and write up a guide entry on it and if it's good enough, it could go in the Edited Guide... Sounds like something I'd be fascinated in reading about!

I agree with Robyn.

I've left you a welcome message on your personal space, it'll hopefully provide you with useful information about this site and help you finding your way around it.

What exactly do you mean by sea dragons? Marine reptiles like mosasaurs?

I'm currently writing a sea serpents guide entry, oddly enough. Most of the 19th Century sightings were of maned snake-like creatures rather than dragons. I'd be fascinated to read about the evidence you have discovered, as none of the sea monsters/lake monsters ever got beyond sightings and dubious photographs.

As Robyn said, if you write a guide entry, then you can add a link to the Seazoria website. If you're interested, then I suggest you first read a few similar entries in the Edited Guide - see C535 for example - as these will give you an idea of style.

When you've written something, you then have to submit it to a review forum, like Peer Review for our Edited Guide. It will then be reviewed, then if selected it will be edited and published on the h2g2 Front Page.

Lots more information at the <./>Contribute</.> page.

Good luck!

hmmmmmmmmmmmm.
a quick google finds some, erm, interesting sites.

Yes this might not be the right place for it. Try the Fortean Times forum instead.

Thanks for the useful info. That sound like a lot of fun to create a dragon page in this sight

Keep in mind that when making an entry, it will be peer reviewed by people who will check your facts.

In detail. And many of them are not backwards in coming forward.

I'm not trying to scare you off, but be careful how you pitch this and what implications you may make, they will be questioned!

It's a bit like base-jumping, writing for the EG

Just ensure it is written in your own words and be careful not to copy it from the web


lil xx

The research is based on more than 7500 hours working with the Seazoria Dragon Discovery. All of the information related to this Prehistoric sea dragons discovery was was developed over a five and a half year period. While working in commercial excavation below an ancient seashore in Utah USA. I began noticing that the the individual stones in the top 15 meters below the surface were arranged in the exact configurations of large scale extremely evolved prehistoric sea dragons. The Hallettestoneion Seazoria dragons are not vertebra land dinosaurs. This discovery represents a completely new era of advanced prehistoric marine biology. The Seazoria dragons are the largest, oldest, and most advanced forms of life ever discovered. I welcome the thought of peer reveiwed research. Maybe the researchers in this forum can help advanced this discovery which is the single most significant prehistoric biological discovery in history to date. I will begin soon to post more detailed information on the discovery of the Hallettestoneion Seazoria dragons on my space. And thanks for the replies and posts everyone. seazoria

one to watch I feel.

"this discovery which is the single most significant prehistoric biological discovery in history to date"
I think I'll let the paleantologist community be the judge of that.

and look at this wonderful smiley!

last post you are right the discovery confirmation will need to come from the paleontology community. The statement of the most advanced forms of prehistory biology ever discovered, was based on comparing the overall size an more importantly the compounded evolutionary advancement and development of the Hallettestoneion Seazoria Dragons compared directly to the land dinosaurs. Out here in Utah we live in a state that is rich is prehistoric biology. Here are a couple of comparative examples of Seazoria dragons compared to land dinosaurs. The largest land dinosaurs were about 130 feet long. Seazoria dragons range in size from 130 to 300 feet in overall length. Another example is teeth. The world record for a dinosaur tooth is 13 inches. Seazoria Dragons average 27 inch teeth. The most important characteristics is the level of massive compounded evolutionary development between the Seazoria Dragons verses land Dinosaurs. The Seazoria dragons are three times the size of the dinosaurs, three times older, and thousands of generations more evolutionarily advanced. I am sorry if this post sounds somewhat forceful. My intention is not to offend anyone because we are very interested in everyones input. Comparisons were made by evaluating and studying actual dinosaurs in local and national museums. We have always felt like the people who were going to legitimize and bring the Seazoria Dragons discovery to paleontological acceptance are located in England.

There is a couple of journal entries posted on my space that might provide more information on the Seazoria dragons discovery. Be advised that the prehistoric sea dragons became extinct 540 million years ago and the remains have been reduced to dirt and stone. The best means of identifying the dragon remains is to look at the shape. Evaluate the consistency of the repeating shape. And if you look into the Seazoria dragon website you can view photos of a Seazoria Dragon skull matrix excavation. Don't expect to apply your knowledge of dinosaurs to the Seazoria Dragons This is a completely different era of prehistoric biology. The teeth are arranged in a horseshoe duck-billed configuration more like a crocodile. And yes we realize that your first impression is to think that the Seazorias might just be rocks. Do you research and look very closely and ask yourself the sceintific questions like. how did these stones arrive in this exact location. Why are the individual stones arranged in the exact configuration of a large scale highly evolved marine reptile. Why do all the teeth grown in biological structures. How come the external and internal sub structure of the Seazoria teeth can be compared directly with all other forms of advanced prehistoric teeth. Why do the teeth always grow in exacting right or left handed structural configurations only. Why do the full size Seazoria Dragon teeth always have identical progressive replacement teeth. If you view the Seazoria dragon discovery website look into the zoria lab tab and look how all of the teeth and spikes currently under examination are all basically in the same shape, a five sided triangular wedge. rights and lefts only. Also in the zoria lab are examples of identical progressive biological structures. Not just similar but exact progressive identicals. Biology grows in right and lefts, geology is formed biology is created.
Can anyone put us in touch with Any UK sceintific organizations that might be interested in advancing the prehistoric Seazoria Dragon discovery.
thanks. Seazoria

I can put you in touch with a UK linguistics operation that are putting forward the discovery of the paragraph, if that'd help?

Traveller in Time thinking back to the old days
"About 540 million years ago. That is when the first animals with shells and bones began to become top preditors.

Beautifull time; animals beginning to move at their will and plant life getting root.

Some dragons you say . . . pretty complex for that age I guess. "

Currently I'm trying to absorb Richard Dawkins' The Ancestor's Tale.
A quick look ahead from where I am suggests that 500 - 600 mya (million years ago) is just a touch early for creatures of the size & sophistication being mooted here - even allowing generous error margins.

Methinks Seazoria will need an awful lot of near incontrovertible evidence...

Pro Tem, I side with (in my ignorance?).

@ Psy...

*wipes away tears*

sorry, but that was stunning.