A Conversation for Ask h2g2
9/11 or 11/9?
swl Started conversation Feb 16, 2007
Why do Americans do dates all wrong? Instead of the entirely logical and correct "day/month/year", they use "month/day/year". Is there a reasonable excuse for such wrong-headedness?
I presume Canadians, being easily led, do the same thing, but are there any other countries who do it wrong too?
9/11 or 11/9?
Icy North Posted Feb 16, 2007
The American way is more logical in terms of ordering, so long as you use leading zeroes. 0925 (Sep 25th) is numerically before (less than) 1007 (Oct 7th), but in the English rendition 2509 is not numerically before (less than) 0710.
Most computer programmers will use date/time formats like YYYYMMDDHHMISS (example is 20070216091023 for 23 seconds past 10 minutes past 9am on 16th Feb 2007) as this will automatically order time fields numerically.
9/11 or 11/9?
taliesin Posted Feb 16, 2007
Incorrect. Not to mention impertinent
In Canada, the preferred useage is dd/mm/yyyy
'Official' documents and such use the ISO standard yyyy/mm/dd
Canadians, being fairly tolerant folk, also understand the USian travesty of mm/dd/yyyy
9/11 or 11/9?
Woodpigeon Posted Feb 16, 2007
I have nothing against the American date format. When I was 20 I managed to get into all the pubs because my passport seemed to imply that I was 21. Lucky indeed I wasn't born on the 12th of January..
9/11 or 11/9?
IctoanAWEWawi Posted Feb 16, 2007
to be fair, most computer programmers will use a variable of type DATE or DATETIME (or equiv) which means that ordering and equivalence is done in date order and alphanumeric order. And then you format the DATE field as appropriate for your output.
Depends on systems but most places I've seen order it according to the local preference - so USA systems use MM/DD/YYYY and UK uses DD/MM/YYYY - although these days there quite a few places that use RR instead of YY (or RRRR instead of YYYY) where RR is post Y2K moving window that assigns the century according to the current date and the entered date. This was a simple fix for Y2K but it does mean that after 2049 you won;t be able to enter a date for 1900's (and 2 digit years for 1900 will be read as 2000 dates).
9/11 or 11/9?
IctoanAWEWawi Posted Feb 16, 2007
"means that ordering and equivalence is done in date order and *NOT* alphanumeric order"
slight change to meaning!
9/11 or 11/9?
Traveller in Time Reporting Bugs -o-o- Broken the chain of Pliny -o-o- Hired Posted Feb 16, 2007
Traveller in Time on his head
"I use both, does not really matter as long as you can recognise what locale it is."
9/11 or 11/9?
KB Posted Feb 16, 2007
Some people say today is "the 16th of February". Some would say it's "February the 16th". Presumably the latter is more common in the US and that's why. Or is that putting the cart before the horse? Perhaps they say "February 16th" because it is written 02/16.
9/11 or 11/9?
Just Bob aka Robert Thompson, plugging my film blog cinemainferno-blog.blogspot.co.uk Posted Feb 17, 2007
That's the way I interpret it, King Bomba. The spoken order seems to me to come from the written order.
9/11 or 11/9?
Tigger_juggler Posted Feb 17, 2007
"Why do Americans do dates all wrong? Instead of the entirely logical and correct "day/month/year", they use "month/day/year". Is there a reasonable excuse for such wrong-headedness? "
I wouldn't say it's necessarily wrong-headedness, just a different way of looking at it.
Living in the US all my life, I've never had any problem with either way it's written. I think we just use month, day year, because when you read a calendar, you go from top to bottom. So, in this case, you'd read the month first, then the day, and unless it's the first week in January, the year is pretty easy to remember.
In some cases, we do use the day/month/year format, but it's usually documents you have to file for work. Same goes with the metric system in the United States. We usually use millimeters, liters, grams etc., in science projects because that's the standard for that field. When it comes to cooking and groceries, however, we use pound, cups, gallons, etc. It can be confusing at times, but in my case, I've just learned to adapt when I read dates online.
9/11 or 11/9?
TRiG (Ireland) A dog, so bade in office Posted Feb 18, 2007
I always use the format 2007-02-18, because it's the only one that's always unambiguous.
TRiG.
9/11 or 11/9?
Sho - employed again! Posted Feb 19, 2007
I always write the month to be sure (19 Jan 07)
9/11 or 11/9?
Traveller in Time Reporting Bugs -o-o- Broken the chain of Pliny -o-o- Hired Posted Feb 19, 2007
9/11 or 11/9?
aka Bel - A87832164 Posted Feb 19, 2007
>>I always write the month to be sure (19 Jan 07)<<
Hmmm, yes, because otherwise it could be confused with what's the name of the 19th month?
9/11 or 11/9?
Sho - employed again! Posted Feb 19, 2007
*smacks B'elana*
you KNOW what I mean...
and you lot can talk anyway, you say all your numbers backwards
9/11 or 11/9?
HarpoNotMarx (((2*1)^6)-6-(2*8)=42 Posted Feb 19, 2007
Did sales of Porsches drop off in Yankeeland post September 2001??
Key: Complain about this post
9/11 or 11/9?
- 1: swl (Feb 16, 2007)
- 2: Icy North (Feb 16, 2007)
- 3: taliesin (Feb 16, 2007)
- 4: swl (Feb 16, 2007)
- 5: Woodpigeon (Feb 16, 2007)
- 6: IctoanAWEWawi (Feb 16, 2007)
- 7: IctoanAWEWawi (Feb 16, 2007)
- 8: Traveller in Time Reporting Bugs -o-o- Broken the chain of Pliny -o-o- Hired (Feb 16, 2007)
- 9: KB (Feb 16, 2007)
- 10: Just Bob aka Robert Thompson, plugging my film blog cinemainferno-blog.blogspot.co.uk (Feb 17, 2007)
- 11: Tigger_juggler (Feb 17, 2007)
- 12: TRiG (Ireland) A dog, so bade in office (Feb 18, 2007)
- 13: Sho - employed again! (Feb 19, 2007)
- 14: Traveller in Time Reporting Bugs -o-o- Broken the chain of Pliny -o-o- Hired (Feb 19, 2007)
- 15: IctoanAWEWawi (Feb 19, 2007)
- 16: aka Bel - A87832164 (Feb 19, 2007)
- 17: Icy North (Feb 19, 2007)
- 18: Sho - employed again! (Feb 19, 2007)
- 19: HarpoNotMarx (((2*1)^6)-6-(2*8)=42 (Feb 19, 2007)
More Conversations for Ask h2g2
Write an Entry
"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is a wholly remarkable book. It has been compiled and recompiled many times and under many different editorships. It contains contributions from countless numbers of travellers and researchers."