A Conversation for The h2g2 Doctor Who Group

Doctor Who

Post 3261

Just Bob aka Robert Thompson, plugging my film blog cinemainferno-blog.blogspot.co.uk

A very good episode IMO. The angels did scare me, although I was worried that over-exposure might weaken them.
Riverboat Song is an interesting character, but I can't help thinking her flippancies with regard to the Doctor are slightly over-used. It seems like the writer is awfully taken with the idea of 'someone who talks to the Doctor like that', like a new toy. It's not too intrusive though ... yet.
The winking instead of blinking was a great idea. It's one of those that, when you see it, you're astonished you didn't see before.
Also, does anybody else see a similarity between the dead people communicating in this episode and in the Library episodes?


Doctor Who

Post 3262

RadoxTheGreen - Retired

I like the way that the nations kids are now scared of all the statues, regardless of whether they look like angels or not. Yeah, give 'em all nightmares smiley - evilgrin


Doctor Who

Post 3263

HonestIago

Really liked that, but Amy Pond isn't working for me I'm afraid.

I really like River Song, she's a fantastic character and I enjoyed how Moffat brought the question right out at the start: is she the Doctor's wife? River's response to it was good.

I like the idea of River making occasional appearances: never being a full, permanent companion, but popping up and staying for an episode or two before going her own way again. She's a fantastically independent character and she has great banter with the Doctor. If she was always there it'd be grating but as an occasional foil: superb.

The Weeping Angels are probably the scariest monster in New Who: loved seeing them back.


Doctor Who

Post 3264

Just Bob aka Robert Thompson, plugging my film blog cinemainferno-blog.blogspot.co.uk

Not the two-headed statues though. They're okay.


Doctor Who

Post 3265

Clive the flying ostrich: Amateur Polymath | Chief Heretic.

I'm afriad I shall have to agree with m'esteemed colleague Mr Iago.

I think River Song is a terrif character creation, she worked in Silence in the Library and her reprise here was every bit as strong. I think the incidental companion bit (with the occasional protracted hiatus) would be perfect especially here counter-manding of the usual flow of time.

By comparison Pond seems, a pale shadow, I thought the character okay at the beginning (still disappointed she's not a cop) the sceptical note sounded by the raggedy doctors unreliability' but I'm just not sold on her yet, which four episodes in, I feel I ought to be.

It'll be interesting to see where the conspiracy of 90's Amy goes, that might yet redeem her but it's slow progress....

Also who's betting shooting the gravity globe makes them all float up to The Byzantium?
smiley - rocket


Doctor Who

Post 3266

Magwitch - My name is Mags and I am funky.

Those shoes can't compete with these...

http://tinyurl.com/y3eohme

Loved that episode, though, can't wait for next week. Matt is shaping up to be an excellent Doctor.


Doctor Who

Post 3267

Galigan

"Did anyone else notice that when Amy was trapped in the trailer with the image and the Doctor said "Don't blink" she started to wink alternatively. Seems like the easy solution to the whole thing ..."

Have you tried winking alternately? When I spotted her doing it I tried it and couldn't keep it up even for the rest of the scene without blinking, it's surprisingly hard!

I really enjoyed that episode. SO much better than last week's, and the way they've brought back River Song and the Angels works really well. With regards to Amy, do you think that her looking pale next to River is deliberate? Especially when she says the 'does anybody need me?' line. Overall though a cracking performance from all, and I can't b****y wait until next week!!


Doctor Who

Post 3268

Vip

The Angels are in thier heads - it wouldn't suprise if the ship was right in front of them but they can't see it, just like Amy couldn't see her hand wasn't stone. I am most looking forward to finding out though!

smiley - fairy


Doctor Who

Post 3269

Galigan

Also, after last week I posted a link to a blog I'd done about the episode. I've done another one this week at http://wp.me/pLq5j-2e and I'm posting it here because it is fairly relevant, but I realise that this may come across as a bit desperate for a blogger so if anyone's annoyed by me doing it then please say so and I'll stop posting the links here in future.


Doctor Who

Post 3270

Magwitch - My name is Mags and I am funky.

Not annoyed by the blog links at all, Galigan smiley - ok


Doctor Who

Post 3271

Mol - on the new tablet

I was hiding behind my cardigan for quite a lot of that episode smiley - blush. As was Nod (13).

7 year old Osh was very blase and says the angels aren't frightening any more.

Mol


Doctor Who

Post 3272

Deb

I was full of expectation for this episode - and I wasn't disappointed! I was so caught up I didn't realise we'd run out of time until the music started and then I went "Nooo!" Those angels seriously creep me out! And I've got to wait another week to find out how they're defeated this time.

I really, really like Matt as the Dr. But I still haven't warmed to Amy. Maybe she'll grow on me eventually.

Roll on next Saturday!

Deb smiley - cheerup


Doctor Who

Post 3273

Bright Blue Shorts

"It'll be interesting to see where the conspiracy of 90's Amy goes"

Hmmm ... I'm not convinced about that ... rewatched the "Eleventh Hour" the other day ...

- The glimpse of the ID card (issued in 1990) is just that a glimpse. Nowhere near long enough to see without a freeze frame.
- The nothing older than a M-reg car is plain wrong. Later in the scene there is an 'R' reg car which dates it at least to 1997-98.


Doctor Who

Post 3274

Ferrettbadger. The Renegade Master

smiley - wow

Best episode of the season so far, fricking loved it. The angels are great villains.

And blow me Matt Smith is turning out to be frigging ace a the Doc... Role on next week!

FB


Doctor Who

Post 3275

HonestIago

I think there's a way to prove the 90s conspiracy one way or the other: what year was the Beast Below set in, and how old did it say Amy was?


Doctor Who

Post 3276

kipperonthefloor - Make sense? What fun is there in Making sense?

Has no-one taken into account The shot of a complete Millennium Dome? The Dome wasn't finished until 1999


Doctor Who

Post 3277

Xanatic

Camera phones were not all that advanced in the 90s either.


Doctor Who

Post 3278

Bright Blue Shorts

"Camera phones were not all that advanced in the 90s either."

But that's the crack in time conspiracy ... that they have the future technology in the wrong era ...


Doctor Who

Post 3279

Primeval Mudd (formerly Roymondo)

Alex Kingston - has she been watching John Nathan Turner era episodes for lessons in hamming it up?

Apart from her attempts to disrail the whole thing with her pantomime performance I thought that was a pretty splendid episode.


Doctor Who

Post 3280

Just Bob aka Robert Thompson, plugging my film blog cinemainferno-blog.blogspot.co.uk

An occasionally returning occasional companion? Is Moon River Moffat's Captain Jack?

Another thing just came to my mind.

1. Amy POND
2. RIVER Song

Coincidence? Perhaps.


Key: Complain about this post

Write an Entry

"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is a wholly remarkable book. It has been compiled and recompiled many times and under many different editorships. It contains contributions from countless numbers of travellers and researchers."

Write an entry
Read more