A Conversation for How to Make your own Atom Bomb
This thread has been closed
f**k terrisom
combattant pour liberte Posted Dec 20, 2002
I meant "afford" not "afford". I was only kidding, so please don't "neutralise" me NSA/CIA/MI5, etc.!
f**k terrisom
combattant pour liberte Posted Dec 20, 2002
That is still technically illegal in England, under the "blasphemy against Christianity" laws
f**k terrisom
Speak Up ! Your intitled to your own stupid opinion Posted Dec 20, 2002
Now what would be a good idea is to take this stuff to Iraq and blow them to bits woo hoo
f**k terrisom
CopyMaster Posted Dec 22, 2002
I would have to see evidence to believe any American jurisdiction would allow an arrest like that. Just doesn't happen. Can't criminalize individual words here.
Urban legend, methinks.
f**k terrisom
Great Ceasers Ghost Posted Dec 24, 2002
Censorship stops kids hearing the word 'c**t'
I for one am against such a thing.
Swearing is wonderfully expressive and can be used to great effect, but only when used sparingly.
Remember the boy who cried wolf.
Censorship, if it has a function, is to help keep those rude words from being overused, and so helps to maintain their shock value, for all those special occasions
f**k terrisom
Great Ceasers Ghost Posted Dec 24, 2002
PS
America is a hotbed for intolerance and bigotry. Rich as you may be, you sure can be ignorant and reactionary. A person being arrested for a slight on Jesus would surprise me considerably less than if it happened in the UK
Stick that in your pipe, uncle sam
f**k terrisom
Rt. Rev. Lesley Gentle Posted Dec 24, 2002
How does President Bush get away with having his business interests in oil dictate foreign policy? It's a disgrace, and the media does nothing about it even though it has been shown that there are significant links between Bin Laden and Bush which effectively make them business associates.
Bin Laden and Saddam are sworn enemies as well, W is a far greater ally of Bin Laden than Bush, FACT.
f**k terrisom
Researcher 177704 Posted Dec 27, 2002
Because posts aren't actively moderated anymore, but they were when this thread was started. h2g2 is now self-policed, and offensive material isn't removed until someone complains about it.
If you find post 25 personally offensive, then you're perfectly entitled to yikes it
f**k terrisom
Bebel Matman Owlatron's Thundercat Tshirt Dude Posted Dec 27, 2002
No man, doesn't bother me. I just didn't realise it was self moderated, I thought it was combed consistently for posts which contain words like "c**t", "b*****d", "f**k", and "bum". Wow, this is fun, hope no-one yikeses me... c**tb*****df**kbum. Yippee!
f**k terrisom
Researcher 177704 Posted Dec 27, 2002
Let's just hope that no moderators, Italics or the easily offended read this thread
Swearing is still against the house rules, bear in mind.
f**k terrisom
CopyMaster Posted Dec 29, 2002
You can't be arrested in the United States for a religious slur, however vile.
That's a fact. And if you think otherwise, you've bought into a lot of lies about the USA.
England, on the other hand, has an official church that the Queen swears to defend. THAT is something to be ashamed of.
f**k terrisom
Great Ceasers Ghost Posted Dec 30, 2002
George bush?
However dubious and outdated our monarchy is, she is not our national mouthpiece. Mr Bush is an semi-literate chimp, who has difficulty walking and talking at the same time. The USA is a supposedly secular society, but is religiously bigoted and backward, especially in your response to anyone bar christians. You allow people to carry guns, and you have the death penalty.
Shame on YOU, Uncle Sam
f**k terrisom
Rt. Rev. Lesley Gentle Posted Dec 30, 2002
Wow, a stern lecture of a liberal nature from an American! People in glass houses...
f**k terrisom
CopyMaster Posted Jan 1, 2003
I am an atheist, I might add. And a proud American. You are so badly misinformed I weep for you.
The right to bear arms is central to American freedoms. It ensures all our other freedoms can never be taken away if the governments winds shift.
As for the death penalty, that I do not defend. In fact, I'm going to law school in the hopes of seeing it abolished.
We're not perfect. The death penalty is a major stain upon us. But our system, overall, remains far better than any other for the long-term preservation of freedoms.
f**k terrisom
CopyMaster Posted Jan 1, 2003
Furthermore, where do you get this impression that America is religiously intolerant? That bewilders me. As someone who belongs to a very small religious minority (atheism), I've never felt pressured to become a Christian. Sure, there are many Christian blowhards, but they have no actual power.
I'm sick of this attitude from some people that Americans don't understand the rest of the world, because comments such as those from the two of you show that the rest of the world has an even poorer understanding of us.
The things you say ... they are just so fundamentally false, I'm not even sure how to begin responding to them because I don't even begin to see how you came to believe them. Unless you get your impressions of America soley from tapping into our AM radio stations.
f**k terrisom
Great Ceasers Ghost Posted Jan 2, 2003
Misguided idea of America?
Yeah, I'm not so sure. The stereotype is that of a people with an underdeveloped sense of humour, and no sense of what you fellas like to call 'irony'
Were just messeing with you cos you're one of our transatlantic cousins. Try and see it coming next time.
And since when did Atheism become a tiny minority
f**k terrisom
Rt. Rev. Lesley Gentle Posted Jan 2, 2003
America not religiously intolerant? Oh please!
It is precisely this sort of attitude that led to the Band Of Mohammeds performing emergency landings into your office blocks.
While the oil dollar may dictate your foreign policy it manifests itself in the continued mistreatment of the global Islamic community.
f**k terrisom
purplejenny Posted Jan 3, 2003
http://www.geocities.com/cradleoffilthuk1/censorship.html
it was in the UK not the US where fans where arrested for wearing the Jesus is a C**t shirts. My bad.
I don't think that global tolerance is the strong point of ANY empire, past or present. Personally I'd like to see the nation state, imperialism, and all religions chucked in the dustbin, along with a lot of other unnecessary baggage.
f**k terrisom
HappyDude Posted Jan 3, 2003
PJ it sounds like your talking about "Anarchism"
(which for those that are unaware is a political theory holding all forms of governmental authority to be unnecessary and undesirable and advocating a society based on voluntary cooperation and free association of individuals and groups).
A good idea in my book BUT I do think the change over to such a system from the current one would be both messy and painful for an awful lot of people.
Key: Complain about this post
f**k terrisom
- 21: combattant pour liberte (Dec 20, 2002)
- 22: combattant pour liberte (Dec 20, 2002)
- 23: Speak Up ! Your intitled to your own stupid opinion (Dec 20, 2002)
- 24: CopyMaster (Dec 22, 2002)
- 25: Great Ceasers Ghost (Dec 24, 2002)
- 26: Great Ceasers Ghost (Dec 24, 2002)
- 27: Rt. Rev. Lesley Gentle (Dec 24, 2002)
- 28: Bebel Matman Owlatron's Thundercat Tshirt Dude (Dec 27, 2002)
- 29: Researcher 177704 (Dec 27, 2002)
- 30: Bebel Matman Owlatron's Thundercat Tshirt Dude (Dec 27, 2002)
- 31: Researcher 177704 (Dec 27, 2002)
- 32: CopyMaster (Dec 29, 2002)
- 33: Great Ceasers Ghost (Dec 30, 2002)
- 34: Rt. Rev. Lesley Gentle (Dec 30, 2002)
- 35: CopyMaster (Jan 1, 2003)
- 36: CopyMaster (Jan 1, 2003)
- 37: Great Ceasers Ghost (Jan 2, 2003)
- 38: Rt. Rev. Lesley Gentle (Jan 2, 2003)
- 39: purplejenny (Jan 3, 2003)
- 40: HappyDude (Jan 3, 2003)
More Conversations for How to Make your own Atom Bomb
Write an Entry
"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is a wholly remarkable book. It has been compiled and recompiled many times and under many different editorships. It contains contributions from countless numbers of travellers and researchers."