Peer Review

59 Entries in Review

Peer Review | Edited Guide Writing Workshop | Alternative Writing Workshop
Flea Market | Updating an Approved Entry

Welcome to Peer Review, one of several Review Forums on h2g2. Peer Review is the part of h2g2 where you, the Community, help us to decide which Entries go into the Approved version of the site. The Peer Review process has four main steps:

  1. Write Your Entry - a Researcher writes an Entry that is suitable for the Edited Guide: the Approved version of h2g2.

  2. Submit Your Entry - the Researcher submits their Entry to Peer Review.

  3. Read Others' Comments - other Researchers comment on the Entry and help the author to improve it.

  4. Get Accepted - the Entry is Picked by a Scout, accepted by the h2g2 Guide Editors and heads off for inclusion in the Approved version of the site.

Peer Review is not the place for Entries that are unfinished, works in progress, rants, fiction, one-liners, jokes or personal theories.

Writing an Entry

If you're writing an Entry for Peer Review, it needs to be suitable for inclusion in the Approved part of the site. You can be sure of this by following our Writing Guidelines. Essentially, this means it should be truly well written, factual and informative. If your entry doesn't fit the guidelines but you'd still like to submit it, the Alternative Writing Workshop is the best place for the job.

You should check that your chosen subject isn't already covered by an existing Approved Entry1. You can do this by searching h2g2. If you would like to update an existing Approved Entry, you'll need to follow the procedure for Updating an Approved Entry.

You should make sure that the Entry is, as far as you are concerned, finished. If you're looking for a few final comments on an Entry that you haven't quite finished, or you would like others to contribute to your unfinished Entry, you might want to submit it to the Writing Workshop. Alternatively, just keep working on it until you're done, then submit it to Peer Review.

Submitting an Entry to Peer Review

Before submitting an Entry, make sure it fulfils the above requirements. To put an entry into Peer Review, click on the SUBMIT FOR REVIEW link to the right-hand column of the Entry and follow the instructions, choosing 'Peer Review' from the drop-down menu. If you cannot find the SUBMIT FOR REVIEW link, check that the 'Not for Review' box (visible when working on the Entry) isn't ticked.

Approved Entries, Help Pages, Personal Spaces, Entries already in a Review Forum and entries labelled 'Not for Review' cannot be submitted. Also, we'd ask that you don't submit other Researchers' Entries unless you've got a good reason.

Once you've submitted your Entry to Peer Review, it will stay there for at least seven days before a Scout can pick it. This allows time for Researchers to make comments and for you to make any changes recommended. If it looks like you'll need to make major changes to your Entry, the best thing to do is to take it out of Peer Review and resubmit it when it's ready.

Commenting in Peer Review

Before commenting on an Entry in Peer Review, you'll need to read the entry. To do this, click on the title in the list at the bottom of this page.

Once you've read the Entry, don't click on START A CONVERSATION at the bottom of the entry. Instead, click the 'Currently In: Peer Review' link on the right-hand side of the Entry. This will take you to the Peer Review comment thread, where you can add your comments by clicking 'Reply' to the last posting.

Before you comment on an entry in Peer Review, consider the following points:

  • Is it the author's first Entry? (You can check their Personal Space to find out). If so, be gentle in your criticism - if they're really going wrong you may wish to direct them to the Writing Guidelines. Remember, everyone wrote their first Entry once!

  • Have you checked the comments other Researchers have made? If you have spotted a mistake or omission, it might already have been pointed out by someone else.

  • If you like the Entry - say so! Everyone likes compliments.

  • Simply posting 'I hated this, it's rubbish' doesn't give the author much of a clue what they may be doing wrong. If you don't like it, try to make your criticism specific.

  • Wherever possible, try to help the Researcher get the grammar and spelling as accurate as possible. While we have volunteer Sub-editors who polish entries before publication, it never hurts to get the Entry as 'right' as possible early on. This will also help your chances of having the Entry Approved.

  • Ask yourself if you actually understand the Entry. Approved Entries are aimed, in the main, at the educated layman, so if you didn't understand it, it may be a failing of the author. On the other hand, it might well be you, so don't be afraid to tactfully ask for an explanation.

  • Try not to head off on tangents or drift away from discussion of the entry. If there's a burning need to debate anything other than the Entry, please start another Conversation elsewhere.

  • Stay subscribed to the thread; once you've commented, keep an eye on what others are saying. It may be the start of an interesting Conversation.

  • If the Entry gets picked – particularly if it is the author's first – pop back and congratulate the author.

Having Your Entry Accepted

Once your Entry has been in Peer Review for seven days, it can be Picked by a Scout for inclusion in the Approved Guide. Scouts will only pick Entries that have no outstanding corrections, so it's useful to point out when you've made any changes and are happy with your Entry as it stands. The time taken for an Entry to be picked varies hugely, so do be patient.

If you'd like to know about the next stage in the editorial process after a Scout has Picked your Entry, then check out What happens after my Entry has been Picked by a Scout?

1It's also worth checking if there's already an Entry on the topic in Peer Review or if another Researcher is in the process of writing on the same subject, thus giving you the opportunity to put together a collaborative Entry.

Bookmark on your Personal Space

Entries in Review

Subject Author Date Entered Last Posted
A87858850 - Balaam: Donkey Abuser or Rescuer of Civilisations? The Deir Alla Puzzle Dmitri Gheorgheni 3 Days Ago 3 Days Ago
A87858760 - Main Organs of the United Nations Nosebagbadger {Ace} 5 Days Ago 5 Days Ago
A87856645 - Great kissing places: botanical garden, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Dr. Exu Last Week 5 Days Ago
A87858472 - Stipa Tenacissima (Esparto Grass) Mag Last Week 6 Days Ago
A87858364 - Keeping on the Sunny Side - Musical Response to the Great Depression Dmitri Gheorgheni 2 Weeks Ago 2 Weeks Ago
A87856069 - Birkenhead Park, Wirral, UK SashaQ - happysad 2 Weeks Ago Last Week
A87847564 - American Television Reinventions: Reality Bluebottle 2 Weeks Ago Last Week
A87847555 - American Television Reinventions: Game Shows Bluebottle 2 Weeks Ago Last Week
A87847546 - American Television Reinventions: Family Bluebottle 2 Weeks Ago Last Week
A87847410 - American Television Reinventions: Drama Bluebottle 2 Weeks Ago Last Week
A87847401 - American Television Reinventions: Comedy Bluebottle 2 Weeks Ago Last Week
A87847393 - American Television Reinventions Bluebottle 2 Weeks Ago Last Week
A87858085 - Wrestling Jacob: Smash Hit of 1742 Dmitri Gheorgheni 3 Weeks Ago 2 Weeks Ago
A87857978 - Sholom Secunda and Kinky Friedman Sing About the Holocaust Dmitri Gheorgheni 3 Weeks Ago 3 Weeks Ago
A87857815 - Cryptography - Codes and the Zimmerman Telegram SashaQ - happysad 3 Weeks Ago 3 Weeks Ago
A87857590 - The Avengers Enemies: Cybernauts Bluebottle 4 Weeks Ago 4 Weeks Ago
A87857662 - Rover - the Rise and Fall of a Car Manufacturer SashaQ - happysad 4 Weeks Ago 4 Weeks Ago
A87856564 - League of Nations Nosebagbadger {Ace} 4 Weeks Ago 3 Days Ago
A87857248 - The Hanging Gardens of Babylon Bluebottle 5 Weeks Ago 5 Weeks Ago
A87856843 - Beatles Biopics: 'The Linda McCartney Story' Bluebottle Jul 14, 2015 Jul 14, 2015

Review Forum

Write an Entry

"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is a wholly remarkable book. It has been compiled and recompiled many times and under many different editorships. It contains contributions from countless numbers of travellers and researchers."

Write an entry
Read more