This is the Message Centre for Researcher 524695
very funny
azahar Posted Nov 14, 2003
not that I am doing any better, possibly because I have no technique at all, but at least some answers are happening.
yeah I know, you have much more experience with this person than I have, but I don't see how plastering someone who obviously doesn't want to speak to you with incessant postings is somehow going to make him suddenly respond to you.
or is your motive just to get him to stop posting altogether?
az
very funny
Researcher 524695 Posted Nov 14, 2003
I don't really have a motive beyond curiousity.
I wonder why he posts here. He has his testment on that other site - I expect he shows this page to other people like himself. (you show me yours and I'll show you mine...)
When he does, there'll be a thread on his page politely asking where all the Christians have gone. Maybe they can answer.
very funny
azahar Posted Nov 15, 2003
yeah well . . . Matholwch recently posted something on one of Justin's many threads re: the Pope. Saying that he was one gospel short of a testament, which almost made me fall off my chair laughing.
I can't believe you really think the 600,000 ever existed in the first place.
Anyhow, long time no see. How have you been keeping?
az
very funny
Jordan Posted Nov 26, 2003
She probably suspects you're Hoo.
And I don't blame her. We're seeing traces of him everywhere nowadays.
Let's see... Omnipresent, and apparently omniscient in some areas. We're one 'O' short of a paradox here, unless he's alreading walking on websites.
- Jordan
very funny
Jordan Posted Nov 26, 2003
And she has good reason: - 'I've often wondered why it is men (and it is almost invariably men) of a religious persuasion have this overwhelming interest, nay, obsession, with other mens penises - how clean they are, whether they've been operated upon or not, where they're poked for pleasure. In any other context and obsession with another man's penis and what he does with it would be regarded as perverse. Put a religious spin on it, though, and somehow it's OK. Weird.' http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/alabaster/F91415?thread=339173&skip=40&show=20 This is a lot like an extended rant (of the type Hoo is so fond of) on: - 'Now if you can just enlighten me on the point of why it is Christian men are so obsessed with each other's penises, I'll be able to sleep peacefully...' http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/alabaster/F92252?thread=257998&post=3142928#p3142928 Precisely the sort of thing Hoo would come out with... The way you make postings is oddly reminscent of him, and your writing style is very similar, especially when talking to/about Justin. Eerie.
very funny
Jordan Posted Nov 26, 2003
So it was derived independently by three individuals... Interesting, very interesting.
It was obvious, with 20-20 hindsight, that Steve, Programmer of Justin the Preacher was Hoovooloo, but he actually seemed to write rather differently from Hoo - perhaps because he only concerned himself with 'Justin the AI' when in that persona. But this time it looks pretty identical in not a few ways.
- Jordan
very funny
Jordan Posted Nov 26, 2003
Insight: await coded transmission, ETA tomorrow evening.
- Jordan
very funny
azahar Posted Nov 29, 2003
hi Jordan,
No, I don't 'suspect' that Member is Hoo.
hi Member S,
What was that load of crap you just posted on Justin's thread about feminists and paedophiles being the same, that there should have been a commandment made against the both of them?
You spouted a lot of similar mysoginist nonsense on the abortion thread (Partial Birth Abortion). At first I thought there was some irony intented in your postings, until they became too blatant and nasty to ignore.
I can understand that very militant feminists, or very militant gays or very militant whatever factions of certain groups can be quite tiring. But the people who are not extremists and are actually working hard every day within these minority groups to help make their group accepted by society - and NOT as a minority concept, but as a valued and important asset to society - are very hard working and people who deserve respect for what they do. Likewise with people who fight for children's rights.
What is your problem with women? Other than the fact that you think they own too many shoes?
az
very funny
azahar Posted Nov 29, 2003
I'm still waiting for your answer.
Or do you prefer to have a larger audience?
az
very funny
Researcher 524695 Posted Nov 29, 2003
OK, I'm confused.
Larger audience? Hoo? Mysoginist? (is that spelt right?)
I don't know right now where I posted it, but I didn't say pedophiles and feminists were the same, and I didn't say there should be a commandment against them.
They're not the same. Justin condemns feminists. I've never seen him condemn pedophiles, which is probably because the bible doesn't either.
I think I did answer you there, but you musta missed it. So, again - what I SAID was - there's a commandment against worshipping other gods. This implies acknowledgement that they exist. If Justin's right and there are no other gods, that's a complete waste of a commandment, and YOU'D THINK that if he had a spare one, Justin's god might just possibly have commandmented against peadophilia. But he didn't, because he likes fiddling with kids. And you'd think if he was against feminism he'd have mentioned it. But he didn't. Which makes ME think that the misoginist here is Justin.
I'm not concerned with audiences. I'm mainly here to talk to Justin, but he's got me in 'ingore'# and I seem to have been distracted into talking to you and a couple of other people. Oopssssssssy better not let that happen agin.
very funny
azahar Posted Nov 29, 2003
<>
posting 115 to Justin.
I didn't disagree with your concept of , if other gods didn't exist then what is Justin's God feeling jealous about?
I questioned you on the fact that you lumped paedophiles and feminists together in the very same way Justin did. And you have not responded to my request to make that clear.
>>Justin's god might just possibly have commandmented against peadophilia. But he didn't, because he likes fiddling with kids.>>
Excuse me¿ When did Justin ever talk about 'fiddling' with kids?
<>
Oh, now you are using bad English to make yourself appear stupid? Come off it already. You don't want to repsond - fine. Coward. You say a lot but you cannot really back it up, can you?
That is just fine, Simon, but it doesn't wash.
az
very funny
azahar Posted Nov 29, 2003
Anyhow, none of this matters, it's just a debate. I'm still your hootoo friend, or I hope I am. Whatever.
az
very funny
Researcher 524695 Posted Nov 29, 2003
What?
Sorry, but you're really not making sense. When did Justin ever talk about fiddling with kids? Never. When did his god issue a commandment against it? Never. Which was the point.
And what's wrong with my English? I'm responding, if you don't like the response or don't understand it------- I lumped pedophiles and feminists in the same way Justin did BECAUSE Justin did.
I'm bored of explaining this now.
very funny
azahar Posted Nov 29, 2003
<>
Oh sorry, you meant that Justin's God likes fiddling with kids?
No, there is nothing wrong with your English except you keep changing the style in which you are writing.
You're bored with this? Me too. I wish we could just talk again. But never mind.
az
very funny
Researcher 524695 Posted Nov 29, 2003
" you meant that Justin's God likes fiddling with kids?"
yeah duh.
I'm writing in a style? Cool!
very funny
azahar Posted Nov 29, 2003
Justin's God only exists as much as Justin believes him to exist.
And yes, you are writing in many different styles.
Must be hard to remember who you are trying to be!
Gotta go out for tapas now.
az
Key: Complain about this post
very funny
- 1: azahar (Nov 14, 2003)
- 2: azahar (Nov 14, 2003)
- 3: Researcher 524695 (Nov 14, 2003)
- 4: azahar (Nov 15, 2003)
- 5: Researcher 524695 (Nov 15, 2003)
- 6: azahar (Nov 15, 2003)
- 7: Jordan (Nov 26, 2003)
- 8: Jordan (Nov 26, 2003)
- 9: Insight (Nov 26, 2003)
- 10: Jordan (Nov 26, 2003)
- 11: Jordan (Nov 26, 2003)
- 12: azahar (Nov 29, 2003)
- 13: azahar (Nov 29, 2003)
- 14: Researcher 524695 (Nov 29, 2003)
- 15: azahar (Nov 29, 2003)
- 16: azahar (Nov 29, 2003)
- 17: Researcher 524695 (Nov 29, 2003)
- 18: azahar (Nov 29, 2003)
- 19: Researcher 524695 (Nov 29, 2003)
- 20: azahar (Nov 29, 2003)
More Conversations for Researcher 524695
Write an Entry
"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is a wholly remarkable book. It has been compiled and recompiled many times and under many different editorships. It contains contributions from countless numbers of travellers and researchers."