This is the Message Centre for Galaxy Babe - eclectic editor

Bombs in London

Post 1

Galaxy Babe - eclectic editor

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6255960.stm

I'm grateful to London's guardian angels that these devices never explodedsmiley - yikes

I'm astonished at the gorgeous cars being used as death-wrappings, two Mercedes? Are they stolen to order so they'd blend in with the posh cars in the West End?

To the emergency services and the brave people who work for the bomb disposal squad, I salute you.smiley - applause


Bombs in London

Post 2

A Super Furry Animal

Hmmm.

I live in London, and I'm deeply sceptical about this particular incident.

The police have described it as a "a viable explosive device". This sounds too much like a football commentator saying "that was a perfectly good goal". *

They've then gone on to explain all about the possible explosive materials, whilst remaining curiously silent on how all this was going to be detonated.

RFsmiley - evilgrin

* "Perfectly good goals" do not appear on the scoresheet, only in the minds of football commentators.


Bombs in London

Post 3

Wilma Neanderthal

I agree, RF. In the morning it was reported as a 'massive bomb' on LBC radio. Then the 'viable' thing came in. It made me wonder too.

Our son made the comment that he is not so worried about going to Beirut this summer after all.

smiley - erm


Bombs in London

Post 4

A Super Furry Animal

Further, the bomb disposal team carried out a "controlled explosion". I'm confused about whether this was (a) in situ, (b) before or after they'd removed all the "perfectly viable explosives", or (c) after they'd removed the car to a safe location?

Not much of a "viable explosive device", if you ask me.

RFsmiley - evilgrin


Bombs in London

Post 5

Wilma Neanderthal

So they took the photos before this controlled explosion? smiley - bigeyes

Odd security set-up, in that case.

Oh, by the way, LBC is now describing the bombs as 'incidents'...


Bombs in London

Post 6

Galaxy Babe - eclectic editor

I thought they were checking the cars for prints, DNA etc? Or do you mean they exploded the stuff that would've explodedsmiley - erm

I find it all very puzzling.

smiley - headhurts


Bombs in London

Post 7

zendevil


I read that there was apparently a mobile phone in the car, which "an officer" disconnected: this seems like a good idea, so long as the act of disconnecting the thing isn't actually the trigger for the car to go "boom".

Whatever (as they say), whether this is a plot or a real threat, or a whole heap of manipulated spin, at least nobody got hurt.

Yes, the thing of using a Merc made me wonder also. Maybe they make a better class of bang?

zdt


Bombs in London

Post 8

BMT

First of all a controlled explosion doesn't mean a 'big bang'. Its a method of 'disrupting' the fuse/trigger of the device. This can be done electronically as well as 'mechanically'. They certainly wouldn't have used anything that created a spark in light of the petrol fumes that filled the car.

The press conference on news 24 given by the met states it was a bomb disposal officer that disconnected the device, not your ordinary bobby on the beat. As for using the type of vehicle, well, who knows? Not enough detail released as to whether they were stolen, bought or whatever.

As for being a 'viable device' then empty gas cylinders with valves open and petrol fumes, nails as shrapnel, I wouldn't like to be nearby if it went up to be honest.smiley - erm


smiley - cat


Bombs in London

Post 9

Bagpuss

Blimey we're a bit cynical on this thread aren't we? Mind you my initial reaction was odd: A car bomb, I thought, how old-fashioned.


Bombs in London

Post 10

pheloxi | is it time to wear a hat? |

I think the bomb makers see mercedes as a part of western decadence and moral decline....!?


Bombs in London

Post 11

Fizzymouse- no place like home


It depends a lot on who set the bomb really.smiley - erm

I know when the provos were at it they used to buy a car from the small ads - for very little money and then park it legitimately.smiley - erm

I've seen a fair few controlled explosions, and while they do go bang the whole point is that don't detonate the *actual* bomb. That way they have probably saved quite an amount of forensic evidence.smiley - winkeye

A mobile phone is a very viable device to detonate a bomb, so I think it was very sharp work from whoever spotted it.smiley - applause


smiley - mouse



Bombs in London

Post 12

Bagpuss

"I know when the provos were at it they used to buy a car from the small ads - for very little money and then park it legitimately."

Quite a good idea when you bear in mind that one of yesterday's car bombs got towed and, had it gone off, would probably have succeeded in destroying only several other towed cars.


Bombs in London

Post 13

Fizzymouse- no place like home



Well do the naysayers have anything to add tonight.smiley - huh


smiley - mouse


Bombs in London

Post 14

aka Bel - A87832164

Nay smiley - silly


Bombs in London

Post 15

Fizzymouse- no place like home



Apart from nay.smiley - rolleyes



smiley - mouse


Bombs in London

Post 16

BMT


smiley - ponysmiley - spaceneighsmiley - spacesmiley - tongueoutsmiley - spacesmiley - run




smiley - cat


Bombs in London

Post 17

Fizzymouse- no place like home

smiley - rofl


Everyone's a smiley - jester tonight.smiley - rolleyes


smiley - mouse


Bombs in London

Post 18

Traveller in Time Reporting Bugs -o-o- Broken the chain of Pliny -o-o- Hired

Traveller in Time smiley - tit confused
"I thought that was the check out terminal of the airport, definitely remember searching for a smiley - bus from there.

I am sure I heard them about the check in terminal on BBC World news. "


Bombs in London

Post 19

MMF - Keeper of Mustelids, with added P.M.A., is now in a relationship.

It was the 'Haymarket' Fizzy, what else would you expect?

smiley - blackcat That would have had to be Catford,

and smiley - dog would have been the Isle of Dogs.

Stands to reason, Dunnit?

MMF

smiley - musicalnote


Bombs in London

Post 20

BMT

Well, having watched all the news reports now on the attack at Glasgow airport last night I think it's now time to stop the waffle and start getting tough.

We need to seal our borders, all non legal immigrants, failed asylum seekers and anyone who is here that don't adapt to our laws, culture,and way of life should be re-patriated.Mosques and churches that are being used as cover to preach hatred of the west need closing down and the so called 'leaders' need deporting back to country of origin.

There can be no more hiding under the Human Rights Act, the main part of that act is everyones right to life, free from fear of persecution and terror.People flee to this country in theory to escape terror yet they go on to commit heinous crimes including terroism.(No, I'm not saying all do either)

I daresay this will be classed by some as a 'right wing nationalist rant", well, everyone is entitled to their opinion but I will lay odds on that more indigenous british people are thinking this now than those against.

Does anyone else find it strange that people like Liberty, with that Shami shakrabati in charge, are deafeningly quiet when outrages like this occur? They don't come out publicly and condem these acts do they? Whats the betting that when someone is arrested for these outrages they then appear screaming human rights laws at the government and police?

I doubt very much this is the legacy Blair wanted to leave but there can be no doubt that his actions on foreign policy have left us open to attack mainly due to the Iraq debacle. Not a good legacy for any Ex.PM is it?

Just my smiley - 2centssmiley - spaceworth.

smiley - cat


Key: Complain about this post