A Conversation for Ask h2g2

Why didn't the US go metric?

Post 21

A Super Furry Animal

"Buncha cheese-eating surrender monkeys".

RFsmiley - evilgrin


Why didn't the US go metric?

Post 22

Edward the Bonobo - Gone.

And damned tasty cheese it is, too. smiley - tongueout


Why didn't the US go metric?

Post 23

toybox

Mmh, French cheese smiley - drool

And we would also have imposed much better and logical Decimal Time worldwide if it had'nt been for those meddling kids smiley - silly


Why didn't the US go metric?

Post 24

toybox

And aside, I don't believe either that it is acceptable to routinely disparage the French, no matter how tempting smiley - winkeye


Why didn't the US go metric?

Post 25

You can call me TC

(a) The French: In my experience, they are efficient and good at organising, if a bit vague in their statements sometimes. This as opposed to the Germans, who can make clear statements, but have trouble getting things organised. I think carefully before disparaging the French. Am more likely to have a go at Germans.

(b) Metric: I can cope with both, and I learnt both at school. But, despite living in Metric-Land for over 30 years, I agree with (was it van?) whoever said that it's not natural - the imperial system is easier to visualise and a surprising number of things are 30 cm, or 2.5 cm long, (....or wide, or thick).


Why didn't the US go metric?

Post 26

TRiG (Ireland) A dog, so bade in office

The Americans went half-heartedly metric some time ago. They didn't adopt the metric system: they just metricised the imperial system.

Hence the decimal places of an inch (which is just wrong: fractions of an inch should be in halves, quarters, eighths, sixteenths, and thirty-twoths), the lack of stones, the US gallon, the US pint, and the US quart.

Why they couldn't have kept the imperial system or adopted the metric system instead of this silly mixing and matching I don't know. It's annoying.

TRiG.smiley - geek


Why didn't the US go metric?

Post 27

IctoanAWEWawi

well clearly they didn't go metric because they're an imperialist world power. Thought everyone knew that.


Why didn't the US go metric?

Post 28

swl

http://www.instantrimshot.com/


Why didn't the US go metric?

Post 29

swl

Was it Jean Paul Sartre that said, "Hell is being trapped in a room with your friends" or was it "Hell is other people?" Ahh, what does it matter? Everyone he hung out with was French.


Why didn't the US go metric?

Post 30

Who no's ? ........... Not me!!

Numbers already confuse them, changing to metric would be too hard to understand!!


Why didn't the US go metric?

Post 31

Stealth "Jack" Azathoth

If Imperial Measures was good enough for Jesus, it's good enough for me!


Why didn't the US go metric?

Post 32

Stealth "Jack" Azathoth

Ma Fergusson - possibly!smiley - winkeye


Why didn't the US go metric?

Post 33

IctoanAWEWawi

btw swl - http://www.instantrimshot.com/
hours of fun!


Why didn't the US go metric?

Post 34

Cheerful Dragon

"Hence the decimal places of an inch (which is just wrong: fractions of an inch should be in halves, quarters, eighths, sixteenths, and thirty-twoths), the lack of stones, the US gallon, the US pint, and the US quart."

I can't comment on the inches, but the US liquid measures pre-date the metric system. The size of the gallon as used in the US is the 'wine gallon' as standardised in 1707, when it was still part of Britain. This gallon held 128 fluid oz and, as a gallon is always 8 pints, gives a pint of 16 fluid oz. The Imperial gallon, as used in the UK, was standardised in 1824 and gives a pint of 20 fluid oz.


Why didn't the US go metric?

Post 35

six7s

Cos they have 12 fingers?


Why didn't the US go metric?

Post 36

TRiG (Ireland) A dog, so bade in office

That's really interesting, Cheerful Dragon!

TRiG.smiley - cool


Why didn't the US go metric?

Post 37

Bright Blue Shorts

Probably something to do with not wanting to lose the quarter-pounder and not having a royal family to name it after if they did go metric ...


Why didn't the US go metric?

Post 38

Spaceechik, Typomancer

I'm curious -- did the British Isles happen to have just a whole heck of a lot of 14 pound stones, so it was a common reference? smiley - silly

What is the source of "stone"? I remember hearing somewhere it had something to do with the Stone of Scone, but I think that's apocryphal?


Why didn't the US go metric?

Post 39

Cheerful Dragon

Stone probably dates from the times when standard weights were made out of stone. There have been varying values for 1 stone, up to 25lb I believe, before 14lb was settled on.

I've never seen the Stone of Scone, but I'm willing to bet it weighs a lot more than 14lb (or even 25lb).


Why didn't the US go metric?

Post 40

van-smeiter



Do you have any knowledge of mathematics Hapi, hippo #5? Did you miss out the winkeyesmiley or are you really that ignorant? How does having ten fingers, rather than nine, make it easier to express the sum of 6 divided by 7, for example? (that question is intended to be rhetorical.) Have you heard of abaci, calculus and algebra? Do you have any understanding of base numbers?

The metric system is not besed on the number of fingers we have; if you believe that then you're ignorant and, if you don't believe that, your post unfairly disparaged americans. Either way, it ain't good. smiley - erm


Key: Complain about this post