h2g2 The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy: Earth Edition

Entry: Language Efficiency - A805637
Author: Swoosh - maker of puddings, keeper of dribbly pets, known for disappearing frequently - U200610

This entry has been moved to the Alternative Writing Workshop.

I am glad you said that this was an old joke. It is a good one, but not original.

If you have an interest in language or language efficiency why not write something of your own, and put it in here?



Ben

I see that Ben has already gotten here, I like this entry

What do all of you people think (All both of ya)

and by the way, that rule that someone put that says that spelling mistakes are okay to set the ambience and if it's part of the entry, that rule is pointless without this entry

I got a teatowel with this on for Xmas. Interestingly, dispite my terrible spelling I do find the latter part of it very difficult to read. I'm sure there is a moral to that somewhere.

Didn't the American Webster chappie make a sterling attempt to rationalise spelling, resulting in some changes (in Am English), although again it's interesting that just as many didn't make it. I think I saw an article in Peer reveiw about that recently. Anyway.

Huh, I wrote an article about that and put it in peer review recently. Odd that

Then it's you I'm quoting about Webster, then. You should be pleased I paid such close attention.

I'm very pleased.

is content