A Conversation for The Omniscience of God and Human freewill

Alternatives...

Post 161

Toxxin

So you're saying that Douglas Adams didn't originate the babelfish? Heresy!


Alternatives...

Post 162

friendlywithteeth

How rude!


Alternatives...

Post 163

Toxxin

A bit more formally, you seem to be saying that even if I think of/write/make something, someone else thought/wrote it before I did. But the last person to think/write must also fall under your rule. Some other person must have thought/wrote it before them ......... So we get into an infinite regress where nothing can ever have been original however far back we trace it - even unto the first thinking creature! Nare. Don't work do it smiley - biggrin


Alternatives...

Post 164

alji's

No! What I am saying is those things were first thoughts.
The conjunction of babel and fish is unique but babel and fish are not.

Alji smiley - zensmiley - wizard(Member of The Guild of Wizards @ U197895)smiley - surfer


Alternatives...

Post 165

Toxxin

So when someone discovered how to make gunpowder and called it whatever, are you going to say that it wasn't original because charcoal, saltpeter and sulphur already existed?


Alternatives...

Post 166

friendlywithteeth

It still leads to either an infinite regress, or a person who had all the first ideas....which Aquinas called God [not that he thought of it first of course: God did smiley - winkeye]


Alternatives...

Post 167

Toxxin

It sure does, but I just love disproof by counterexample. I thought of invoking God to put a stop to the regress. Logically, there seems to be no alternative, but 'having already been thought of by God' doesn't seem to be much of a criticism of any idea does it? smiley - biggrin


Alternatives...

Post 168

alji's

Right then, tell me what you know that was not the thought of someone else.

Alji smiley - zensmiley - wizard(Member of The Guild of Wizards @ U197895)smiley - surfer


Alternatives...

Post 169

Noggin the Nog

The reason why analogy is such a powerful ideas generator is that it allows us to assimilate new EXPERIENCE. Everything else is "just" restructuring.

Noggin


Alternatives...

Post 170

Toxxin

What I decided to have for lunch. What I said to the girl I met on my walk to the town. My hypothesis about the role of representation in deductive reasoning. Sure, the words I use in describing them were thought of by someone else. I could make up my own, but that wouldn't help to communicate with you would it?


Alternatives...

Post 171

Toxxin

OK. I've done it. Now tell me how you deal with the 'infinite regress' argument?


Alternatives...

Post 172

Toxxin

Now I have to put on my cognitive psychology hat for a moment. Sometimes we assimilate new experience, and sometimes we accommodate. The latter means that we change our way of thinking in order to make room for the new experience. Pure Piaget, I'm afraid. He calls the balance between these two modes 'equilibration'. Wordy stuff, but I like it smiley - smiley

'Just' restructuring eh! So a human is just a restructured bacterium?


Alternatives...

Post 173

Noggin the Nog

No. A human is "just" a restructured bacterium. The quotation marks are important here.

Actually, all eukaryotic cells are several restructured bacteria, and all multicelled lifeforms are agglomerations of eukaryotic cells.

You're actually right of course. Alterations brought about by interacting with the environment are also incorporated. So it takes both forms of "learning."

Noggin


Alternatives...

Post 174

Toxxin

That stuff about the quotes is too obscure. Are they scare quotes, ironic quotes or what? Please spell it out for the non-telepaths among us.


Alternatives...

Post 175

Toxxin

Nog. You're such a bright guy, I know I only have to mention 'emergent properties' and you will know where my next argument is coming from. They do emerge and they're new. Do you really dispute that?


Alternatives...

Post 176

friendlywithteeth

Yes we do.

[to explain it to me smiley - smiley]


Alternatives...

Post 177

friendlywithteeth

Plus I have something new: I created my own theodicy last year smiley - tongueout


Alternatives...

Post 178

Toxxin

Just Google 'emergent properties' but to be brief, a single cell can't think. Build a brain out of them, and it can. The thinking is an emergent property of an aggregation of individually unthinking cells.


Alternatives...

Post 179

friendlywithteeth

Thank ye smiley - smiley


Alternatives...

Post 180

Noggin the Nog

Emergent properties, eh? This is a tricky one. Is a house an emergent property or just a restructuring of a pile of bricks? Is a housing estate an emergent property or just an agglomeration of houses?
A computer is a syntax in relation to its programs, but a semantics in relation to the laws of nature. Structural organisation is heirarchical, but the original elements still make up the bottom level. So are the upper levels new or just restructured?
Personally I think I'd agree with you. A higher level "emergent" structure is new in an important sense. But a lot of new structures are still just restructuring.

Noggin


Key: Complain about this post