A Conversation for Old Announcements: January - September 2011

This thread has been closed

21 June 2002: Non-English Language Postings

Post 361

Tefkat

While I'd hesitate to cast nasturtiums on the Chantywrastlers' intelligence I really can't see how they could have failed to understand post 111.

Or, conversely, how they could possibly have understood more than a few words of post 112.

Go look for yourself.
(And if you should happen to feel the need to yikes it you'll make an owd soak verra happy)


21 June 2002: Non-English Language Postings

Post 362

Frankie Roberto


21 June 2002: Non-English Language Postings

Post 363

Mark Moxon

Which thread, Tefkat?


21 June 2002: Non-English Language Postings

Post 364

Tefkat

This one Mark. smiley - erm


21 June 2002: Non-English Language Postings

Post 365

Tefkat

So does that mean if I use words like "deipnosophist" or "antediluvian" my post will be removed?


21 June 2002: Non-English Language Postings

Post 366

Tefkat

http://www.dictionary.com/search?q=fash

bleth·er Pronunciation Key (blthr)
v. & n.
Variant of blather.

http://www.dictionary.com/search?q=blather


21 June 2002: Non-English Language Postings

Post 367

Mark Moxon

Got it. smiley - ok

A good example of two different Moderators making different decisions, which is exactly what you're going to get when you post up stuff that isn't obviously undrstandable by someone who's ploughing through thousands of these things at 4am trying to earn enough money to see them through their PhD. Look at it from their point of view! smiley - erm

Like I said, we're going to guarantee inconsistency unless you force us to make the rules consistent, but the latter will inevitably mean more censorship. This is a great example of that inconsistency in operation - thanks for bringing it up. smiley - ok


21 June 2002: Non-English Language Postings

Post 368

Peta

Hi Tefkat,

You'll probably be fine with those, all of the moderators are graduates after all. They're just not necessarily graduates of languages and dialects. smiley - winkeye


21 June 2002: Non-English Language Postings

Post 369

Tefkat

One was just wond'rin, Canny Hinny, as a puir aad non-graduate, in what way one hed managed tae "Contravene t'Hoose Rools" lyek?


21 June 2002: Non-English Language Postings

Post 370

HappyDude

could you at least tell the mods that links to non-english sites within the BBC are ok ?


21 June 2002: Non-English Language Postings

Post 371

Mark Moxon

That's not English, Tefkat. The words aren't the English dictionary. That's how.

Isn't that obvious? smiley - erm


21 June 2002: Non-English Language Postings

Post 372

Mark Moxon

"could you at least tell the mods that links to non-english sites within the BBC are ok ?"

Yeah, sure. Which post is wrong? I think the policy changes over the weekend may have confused things a bit, and an example would be handy to use as a pointer.


21 June 2002: Non-English Language Postings

Post 373

Kaz

isn't there an easier way of getting straight to the new stuff without bookmarking after every read?


21 June 2002: Non-English Language Postings

Post 374

a girl called Ben

Which English Dictionary aren't they in?

Ben


21 June 2002: Non-English Language Postings

Post 375

Mark Moxon

Yeah, use the POPUPCONVERSATIONS tag (see <./>GuideML-POPUPCONVERSATIONS</.&gtsmiley - winkeye though this only works over individual sessions. Nice tool if you can leave your machine on, though (ie at work...).

Bookmarks are in the to-do list, though.


21 June 2002: Non-English Language Postings

Post 376

Tefkat

Look, I was bought up to speak The Queen's English. As far as I'm concerned Cockney's a furrin langwidge. But that's the point. You're banning all non-English languages - even British ones. But you can't ban English words THAT ARE IN ENGLISH DICTIONARIES just because yon graduates haven't heard them before.

And you're gonna penalise people for poor spelling?
Isn't that elitist?
Someone brought this up before but it bears repeating: What about dyslexics? I'm dyslexic myself, as are 4 of my 5 kids and even so I've sometimes found it hard to decipher parts of some researchers' posts.
And is there no place on this site for the great unwashed - who weren't privileged enuf to receive as thorough a grounding in the English language as the mods?

Ack!


21 June 2002: Non-English Language Postings

Post 377

Mark Moxon

"Which English Dictionary aren't they in?"

Well, 'aad' isn't in the concise OED, and nor is 'puir'. Are we talking about the same Posting? (I was talking about 369, just for convenience.) So technically 369 isn't in English, it's in some strange phonetic equivalent, in the same way that semaphore isn't English, even when spelling English words.

I don't have a colloquial phoetic dictionary - do you? smiley - smiley


21 June 2002: Non-English Language Postings

Post 378

Tefkat

>> That's not English, Tefkat. The words aren't the English dictionary. That's how <<

Err Mark. Hello? Post 366. Dictionary.com quote their sources as being English dictionaries.
Those were the only two words I used that a Londoner might no understand. The others were merely miss-spellings, the meaning of which would have been obvious if read out loud by anyone with more than two brain-cells to rub together.


21 June 2002: Non-English Language Postings

Post 379

HappyDude

I've not got time to go through thr backlog but here are some examples of Non-English BBC sites

http://www.bbc.co.uk/cymru/
http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/arabic/news/


21 June 2002: Non-English Language Postings

Post 380

Tefkat

Todd's Geordie Words and Phrases (ISBN 0 85983 103 5) is an English dictionary.....


Key: Complain about this post