A Conversation for The Celebrity Game!

No Subject

Post 41

Arthbard

Is that more like blow american football or blow soccer?


No Subject

Post 42

Researcher 185550

soccer


No Subject

Post 43

Arthbard

That little naming convention can cause some confusion for us americans.

I guess the story goes a little something like this. American invents game. Rather than invent new name for game, american decides to take name from old game and apply it to new game despite the fact that, while feet are important to new game, they aren't nearly as important as in old game. To avoid confusion, new name is invented for old game, while old name is applied to new game. Rest of world doesn't "get it," so keep referring to old game by old name, while giving new name to new game. American is baffled as to why some weirdo refers to soccer as football.


No Subject

Post 44

Researcher 185550

I had to read that twice to fully understant it. I do get it now though, and it causes confusions even where it is obvious that american football isn't going to be played ie where there are no goal posts, pads or helmets, like a school gym.


No Subject

Post 45

Researcher 185550

I had to read that twice to fully understant it. I do get it now though, and it causes confusions even where it is obvious that american football isn't going to be played ie where there are no goal posts, pads or helmets, like a school gym.


No Subject

Post 46

Arthbard

I had to read that twice, because you posted it that way smiley - smiley

Perhaps an englishman should invent a new sport, call it basketball, and start refering to basketball as orange-ball-through-the-hoop-game.


No Subject

Post 47

Researcher 185550

Nonono I'd invent a new game, call it basketball, and start calling what actually IS basketball say, handball. Which would cause confusion in France too 'cos that's where handball originated.


No Subject

Post 48

Arthbard

Brilliant. More confusion for everyone!


No Subject

Post 49

Researcher 185550

.order reverse in sentences writing by everyone confuse could We


No Subject

Post 50

Arthbard

.brilliant is That

.Yoda are we think would People


No Subject

Post 51

Researcher 185550

.smiley - zengenius philosophical a am I Well ?hairy and green, small we're mean that Does


No Subject

Post 52

Arthbard

...you for speak can't I Well


No Subject

Post 53

Researcher 185550

course of, too are you well Oh


No Subject

Post 54

Researcher 185550

.course of, too are you well Oh


No Subject

Post 55

Researcher 185550

.double, double everything type I Seems


No Subject

Post 56

Researcher 185550

.double, double everything type I Seems


No Subject

Post 57

Arthbard

.this watch nothing That's


No Subject

Post 58

Arthbard

.this watch nothing That's


No Subject

Post 59

Arthbard

.this watch nothing That's


No Subject

Post 60

Arthbard

.this watch nothing That's


Key: Complain about this post