A Conversation for Talking About the Guide - the h2g2 Community

Do you think this is true??

Post 21

emo_kid- that's meee alright!

Aahh, I get it now! Well, you learn something new everyday!


Do you think this is true??

Post 22

DA ; Simply Vicky: Don't get pithy with me!

Hey jwf, that's so completely smiley - cool! I am singing it to myself...

Vicky


Do you think this is true??

Post 23

emo_kid- that's meee alright!

I agree. smiley - eureka


Do you think this is true??

Post 24

~ jwf ~ scribblo ergo sum

smiley - cheers

Ya, y'canna beat the old standards, eh wot!

I spent several happy constructive moments in my own mind trying to write more verses but ran into an old problem with the original lyrics; the song was so popular it was covered by many of both gender persuasions. One man's version might talk about being in curls while another talked about short pants - and that's without even considering the problems of the original translation into English.

smiley - musicalnote
"Will I be winsome,
will I be a bitch.
Here's what she said to me..."
smiley - musicalnote

smiley - ok
~jwf~


Do you think this is true??

Post 25

emo_kid- that's meee alright!

Right. smiley - erm


Do you think this is true??

Post 26

The Covenant

You said: "Science began to become a substitute for religion way back in the Renaissance when 'intelligent' men sought answers to questions religions were afraid to ask"

I am sorry.
As far as I understand, it was Darwin who propounded that the first living creature evolved in a “warm little pond.” Today, almost all evolutionary biologists will privately admit that science has no explanation for how life evolved.


Do you think this is true??

Post 27

Effers;England.


>Today, almost all evolutionary biologists will privately admit that science has no explanation for how life evolved. <

Care to elaborate, The Covenant'? That's not my understanding. There's plenty of theories relating to how chemicals can start to reproduce themslves, replicators, and how this over millions and millions of years could have led to early life. I haven't come across the theory that it started in little ponds though.

But I'd like to know where you have got this information about the private admissions of evolutionary biologists.

Until it can be shown conclusively and replicated in the laboratory, they are just theories. I wouldn't be surprised though, that at some point in the future, this will happen.


Do you think this is true??

Post 28

The Covenant

g'day.
One example of an interview can be found here: http://ontherightside.wordpress.com/articles/the-biologist/


Do you think this is true??

Post 29

Effers;England.


g'day too.

Many thanks for thanks for that excellent link. smiley - smiley


Do you think this is true??

Post 30

emo_kid- that's meee alright!

Yeh, yeh! smiley - ok I geddit you don't have to tell me time and time again.

emo_kid_08 smiley - vampire


Do you think this is true??

Post 31

~ jwf ~ scribblo ergo sum

Hey emo! Now that you know which came first - the chicken or the dinosaur egg - here's a little mind blower for you: Didja know that most (and that means almost all) life on this planet is too small for human eyes to see? So maybe we shoulda waited until after the invention of the microscope before deciding that god was dead, eh wot!
peace
~jwf~


Do you think this is true??

Post 32

emo_kid- that's meee alright!

What realy came first coz I have spent half my life thinking about it?????????????????


Do you think this is true??

Post 33

~ jwf ~ scribblo ergo sum

Well, I can only hope you're old enough for this, but the truth of that old joke is and always will be:
The rooster.
smiley - run
Eggs by themselves never become chickens without a rooster.
smiley - bigeyes
~jwf~


Do you think this is true??

Post 34

emo_kid- that's meee alright!

Yeh, I see what you mean! smiley - ok

emo_kid_08 smiley - vampire


Key: Complain about this post