A Conversation for Historiography - The Rankian School of Thought
Peer Review: A20980640 - Historiography - The Rankian School of Thought
Kyra Started conversation Mar 22, 2007
Entry: Historiography - The Rankian School of Thought - A20980640
Author: Kyra - Hello. My name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die - U1572880
Just a quick look at empirist history.
A20980640 - Historiography - The Rankian School of Thought
Icy North Posted Mar 23, 2007
Thanks Kyra - Very interesting
I posted a general comment about this and its sister entry on the other's peer review thread:
F48874?thread=3993390 (A21013598 - Historiography - The Annales School of Thought)
Icy
A20980640 - Historiography - The Rankian School of Thought
AlexAshman Posted Apr 4, 2007
OK, here are some nitpicks for this one:
"Ranke has been accused of being a historicist" - you should add a footnote explaining that this is someone who believes historical events are beyond human control/influence.
"He produced 54 volumes of history, which he had published in 1871 before going on to write a nine volume universal history in the ten years before his death at the age of 91."
-->
"He produced 54 volumes of history, which he published in 1871 before going on to spend ten years writing a nine volume history before his death at the age of 91."
"Macaulay writes of the history of Britain that 'the history of our time during the last 160 years is eminently the history of physical, of moral and of intellectual improvement'."
--> As you mention the last 160 years, you should give the year he said this: "In ????, Macaulay wrote of the history of Britain that..."
Good work
A20980640 - Historiography - The Rankian School of Thought
Magwitch - My name is Mags and I am funky. Posted Apr 6, 2007
Nice little entry this Kyra
A couple of missing commas methinks;
such as Thomas Babington Macaulay dominated --> comma after Macaulay
mpirical school of thought later to be --> comma after thought
That's about all I can add
Congratulations - Your Entry has been Picked for the Edited Guide!
h2g2 auto-messages Posted Apr 11, 2007
Your Guide Entry has just been picked from Peer Review by one of our Scouts, and is now heading off into the Editorial Process, which ends with publication in the Edited Guide. We've therefore moved this Review Conversation out of Peer Review and to the entry itself.
If you'd like to know what happens now, check out the page on 'What Happens after your Entry has been Recommended?' at EditedGuide-Process. We hope this explains everything.
Thanks for contributing to the Edited Guide!
Congratulations - Your Entry has been Picked for the Edited Guide!
Elentari Posted Apr 30, 2007
Hi Kyra. Good entry. I realise that this is a little late but if you want the subed can always add it:
I think you should mention Ranke's belief in universal history - that is to say that events all followed on from each other. In his writings, he would often go back to the middle ages or earlier to explain the genesis of much later events.
Key: Complain about this post
Peer Review: A20980640 - Historiography - The Rankian School of Thought
- 1: Kyra (Mar 22, 2007)
- 2: Icy North (Mar 23, 2007)
- 3: Kyra (Mar 23, 2007)
- 4: AlexAshman (Apr 4, 2007)
- 5: Kyra (Apr 4, 2007)
- 6: Magwitch - My name is Mags and I am funky. (Apr 6, 2007)
- 7: Kyra (Apr 6, 2007)
- 8: Rockhound (Apr 8, 2007)
- 9: The H2G2 Editors (Apr 11, 2007)
- 10: h2g2 auto-messages (Apr 11, 2007)
- 11: Icy North (Apr 11, 2007)
- 12: AlexAshman (Apr 11, 2007)
- 13: Kyra (Apr 11, 2007)
- 14: Rockhound (Apr 12, 2007)
- 15: Elentari (Apr 30, 2007)
More Conversations for Historiography - The Rankian School of Thought
Write an Entry
"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is a wholly remarkable book. It has been compiled and recompiled many times and under many different editorships. It contains contributions from countless numbers of travellers and researchers."