h2g2 The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy: Earth Edition

Entry: The Good Luck Inn, Welington, New Zealand - A1092638
Author: yashya - U178368

its a bit rough around the edges, any idea on improvements or more obviously the glaring SP's ive missed...

Howsabout a move to the AWW seeing as how the author has elvised?

Umm... a move to the AWW won't work if the author's elvised; they won't be around to work on their entry!

I would move for a back to entry. It's not quite EG material, so it can't really go to the FM.

I was asked to move things to AWW if they look suitable by some miners though...

Really? Okay then, but how can the entry be reviewed if it is put in the AWW? The author can't make the necessary changes. Wouldn't it make more sense just to move back to entry, and then let said Miners know that there's an entry that would be suitable for the UG? If they want it even after the author has Elvised, that means that they don't think it needs reviewing. So why clutter up another review forum with what's been removed from this one?

Sorry if I sounded crabby just then... my ire is not directed at you.

A number of people disagreed with my proposal of doing away with the ability to submit other Researcher's entries to PR on the basis that it would stop them being able to do that in the AWW, since it's not possible to disable the feature in one review forum but not in others - it has to be all or nothing. It seems that not having the original author around to work on an entry isn't such a problem in the AWW, although maybe I got that wrong - not sure.

Besides, I reckon this one ought to go to the Flea Market.

I don't think it should be in the flea market, as I think it's good as it is, just not EG suitable. That's why I thought AWW would be good...

I've got no problem with it going straight into the UG if that's what the miners want - but it seems to me to just be silly to put it into a review forum when the author isn't around to incorporate the reviewers' suggestions. Especially for UG-suitable entries, where much more is dependent on the author's individual perspective than in EG entries, it's important that the author be consulted if any suggestions are made or anything is to be changed.

And there's at least one out-of-date fact. I'm not familiar with the bar, but as of November 2004 all bars and restaurants in New Zealand are smoke-free, not 'smoke-filled.'

Hence the importance of further review, I would have thought. My two cents is probably back to Entry.

Matt

Back to entry then?

I think so.