A Conversation for The Stone of Destiny

The true fate of the stone

Post 21

Researcher 33337

Thats about the size of it. Actually I don't know teh exact... No wait, not getting sidetracked. My mum visited Edinburgh recently wand was profoundly unimpressed with teh stone, probably because, its just a stone.


The true fate of the stone

Post 22

Ardzil ( Squad No-4 )

I'm not surprised. I've seen lots of stones and none of them have impressed me.


The true fate of the stone

Post 23

Researcher 33337

I don't know. Shiney ones can be impressive. And those really big ones, Mountains I think they're called.


The true fate of the stone

Post 24

Ardzil ( Squad No-4 )

true mountains are impressive, but aren't they collections of stones as opossed to single stones(with rings in them)


The true fate of the stone

Post 25

Researcher 33337

True. Come to think of it. Stones with rings in are fairly rare. Not totally but fairly.


The true fate of the stone

Post 26

Ardzil ( Squad No-4 )

While it's true that stones with rings are rare(fairly not totally).
Is that enough to make them impressive.


The true fate of the stone

Post 27

Researcher 33337

Not really. If trained, I coudl probably mut a metal ring in a stone.


The true fate of the stone

Post 28

Ardzil ( Squad No-4 )

But would you want to


The true fate of the stone

Post 29

Researcher 33337

I can't really think of a good reason to put a metal ring in a stone.


The true fate of the stone

Post 30

Ardzil ( Squad No-4 )

I can't even think of a bad reason to put a ring in a stone


The true fate of the stone

Post 31

Researcher 33337

I think it prooves the pointlessnes of teh whole excercise. No wonder its nearly a dead trade. Another thing. We scots clearly don't like our monarchs as much as england does. English monarchs get a nice throne (probably very comfey in its day) ours get, a stone with a ring in it.


The true fate of the stone

Post 32

Ardzil ( Squad No-4 )

As oppossed to a ring with a stone in it


The true fate of the stone

Post 33

Researcher 33337

Now taht has uses, decoration mainly. But still. I don't think nayone would be impressed being proposed to by someone offering them a big hulking stone with a metal ring in it.


The true fate of the stone

Post 34

Ardzil ( Squad No-4 )

If she could lift a stone that size, I wouldn't risk saying no.


The true fate of the stone

Post 35

Researcher 33337

Probably be wise.


The true fate of the stone

Post 36

Ardzil ( Squad No-4 )

smiley - hollyHappy Christmassmiley - santa
I might not be online much for the next few days, so enjoy the holidays.


The true fate of the stone

Post 37

Researcher 33337

And a very merry christmas to you too. And hope you have a great new year. Also hope you get this before christmas or new year otherwise I'll feel silly. Ah what teh hell, its the thought that counts.


The true fate of the stone

Post 38

Godot (Sorry I'm late)

If it is not the real stone in Edinburgh then where is the real stone hidden. "Let us consider the facts" as they say on one particular TV program.
1: One of the people officiating at the crowning of the Bruce (last Scottish king crowned at Scone) was the Earl of Strathmore.
2:The Earl of Strathmore lives 20-25 miles from Scone.
3:His castle has a secret room.


The true fate of the stone

Post 39

Godot (Sorry I'm late)

The original stone would probably been made of basalt.


The true fate of the stone

Post 40

chaiyah

http://www.holyconservancy.org/images/GalleryFamily/edwardschairwostoneM.jpg

One of these photos is from the Queen's website; the other is from the Archdiocese of Canterbury website.

If you look closely, the stone on the right is much smoother than the stone on the left. The one on the right was placed in preparation for QE2's Coronation in 1952. The one on the left was prior to 1950.

Looks to me as if the conspiracy nuts are on to something. There must have been some disaffection for George VI.

Emily


Key: Complain about this post