A Conversation for The Stone of Destiny
- 1
- 2
The true fate of the stone
Researcher 33337 Posted Dec 9, 2000
Thats about the size of it. Actually I don't know teh exact... No wait, not getting sidetracked. My mum visited Edinburgh recently wand was profoundly unimpressed with teh stone, probably because, its just a stone.
The true fate of the stone
Ardzil ( Squad No-4 ) Posted Dec 9, 2000
I'm not surprised. I've seen lots of stones and none of them have impressed me.
The true fate of the stone
Researcher 33337 Posted Dec 12, 2000
I don't know. Shiney ones can be impressive. And those really big ones, Mountains I think they're called.
The true fate of the stone
Ardzil ( Squad No-4 ) Posted Dec 12, 2000
true mountains are impressive, but aren't they collections of stones as opossed to single stones(with rings in them)
The true fate of the stone
Researcher 33337 Posted Dec 13, 2000
True. Come to think of it. Stones with rings in are fairly rare. Not totally but fairly.
The true fate of the stone
Ardzil ( Squad No-4 ) Posted Dec 13, 2000
While it's true that stones with rings are rare(fairly not totally).
Is that enough to make them impressive.
The true fate of the stone
Researcher 33337 Posted Dec 13, 2000
Not really. If trained, I coudl probably mut a metal ring in a stone.
The true fate of the stone
Researcher 33337 Posted Dec 15, 2000
I can't really think of a good reason to put a metal ring in a stone.
The true fate of the stone
Ardzil ( Squad No-4 ) Posted Dec 18, 2000
I can't even think of a bad reason to put a ring in a stone
The true fate of the stone
Researcher 33337 Posted Dec 19, 2000
I think it prooves the pointlessnes of teh whole excercise. No wonder its nearly a dead trade. Another thing. We scots clearly don't like our monarchs as much as england does. English monarchs get a nice throne (probably very comfey in its day) ours get, a stone with a ring in it.
The true fate of the stone
Ardzil ( Squad No-4 ) Posted Dec 19, 2000
As oppossed to a ring with a stone in it
The true fate of the stone
Researcher 33337 Posted Dec 19, 2000
Now taht has uses, decoration mainly. But still. I don't think nayone would be impressed being proposed to by someone offering them a big hulking stone with a metal ring in it.
The true fate of the stone
Ardzil ( Squad No-4 ) Posted Dec 20, 2000
If she could lift a stone that size, I wouldn't risk saying no.
The true fate of the stone
Researcher 33337 Posted Dec 23, 2000
And a very merry christmas to you too. And hope you have a great new year. Also hope you get this before christmas or new year otherwise I'll feel silly. Ah what teh hell, its the thought that counts.
The true fate of the stone
Godot (Sorry I'm late) Posted Sep 12, 2002
If it is not the real stone in Edinburgh then where is the real stone hidden. "Let us consider the facts" as they say on one particular TV program.
1: One of the people officiating at the crowning of the Bruce (last Scottish king crowned at Scone) was the Earl of Strathmore.
2:The Earl of Strathmore lives 20-25 miles from Scone.
3:His castle has a secret room.
The true fate of the stone
Godot (Sorry I'm late) Posted Sep 12, 2002
The original stone would probably been made of basalt.
The true fate of the stone
chaiyah Posted Oct 28, 2006
http://www.holyconservancy.org/images/GalleryFamily/edwardschairwostoneM.jpg
One of these photos is from the Queen's website; the other is from the Archdiocese of Canterbury website.
If you look closely, the stone on the right is much smoother than the stone on the left. The one on the right was placed in preparation for QE2's Coronation in 1952. The one on the left was prior to 1950.
Looks to me as if the conspiracy nuts are on to something. There must have been some disaffection for George VI.
Emily
Key: Complain about this post
- 1
- 2
The true fate of the stone
- 21: Researcher 33337 (Dec 9, 2000)
- 22: Ardzil ( Squad No-4 ) (Dec 9, 2000)
- 23: Researcher 33337 (Dec 12, 2000)
- 24: Ardzil ( Squad No-4 ) (Dec 12, 2000)
- 25: Researcher 33337 (Dec 13, 2000)
- 26: Ardzil ( Squad No-4 ) (Dec 13, 2000)
- 27: Researcher 33337 (Dec 13, 2000)
- 28: Ardzil ( Squad No-4 ) (Dec 14, 2000)
- 29: Researcher 33337 (Dec 15, 2000)
- 30: Ardzil ( Squad No-4 ) (Dec 18, 2000)
- 31: Researcher 33337 (Dec 19, 2000)
- 32: Ardzil ( Squad No-4 ) (Dec 19, 2000)
- 33: Researcher 33337 (Dec 19, 2000)
- 34: Ardzil ( Squad No-4 ) (Dec 20, 2000)
- 35: Researcher 33337 (Dec 22, 2000)
- 36: Ardzil ( Squad No-4 ) (Dec 22, 2000)
- 37: Researcher 33337 (Dec 23, 2000)
- 38: Godot (Sorry I'm late) (Sep 12, 2002)
- 39: Godot (Sorry I'm late) (Sep 12, 2002)
- 40: chaiyah (Oct 28, 2006)
More Conversations for The Stone of Destiny
Write an Entry
"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is a wholly remarkable book. It has been compiled and recompiled many times and under many different editorships. It contains contributions from countless numbers of travellers and researchers."