This is the Message Centre for Br Robyn Hoode - Navo - complete with theme tune

No Subject

Post 21

Br Robyn Hoode - Navo - complete with theme tune

Why?


No Subject

Post 22

toybox

Book said so. QED

http://www.smbc-comics.com/index.php?db=comics&id=1872


No Subject

Post 23

Br Robyn Hoode - Navo - complete with theme tune

Why?


No Subject

Post 24

toybox

If I told you, I would have to kill you.


No Subject

Post 25

Br Robyn Hoode - Navo - complete with theme tune

Why?


No Subject

Post 26

toybox

You tell me smiley - hug


No Subject

Post 27

Br Robyn Hoode - Navo - complete with theme tune

Why?


No Subject

Post 28

Malabarista - now with added pony

To get to the other side. smiley - run


No Subject

Post 29

Br Robyn Hoode - Navo - complete with theme tune

smiley - biggrin

Why?


No Subject

Post 30

toybox

This Posting has been hidden during moderation because it broke the <./>House Rules</.> in some way. You can find out more about moderation on h2g2 <./>here</.>.


No Subject

Post 31

Malabarista - now with added pony

Nice try, toybox, but the links don't work and your user name is still there smiley - nahnah


No Subject

Post 32

toybox

smiley - blush

Well spotted smiley - cheers


No Subject

Post 33

Jackruss a Grand Master of Tea and Toast, Keeper of the comfy chair, who is spending a year dead for tax reasons! DNA!

what the fork noil is going on here.......smiley - smiley


No Subject

Post 34

nortirascal

Dunno, but Toybox has been put on the naughty step by the mods smiley - yikes Why?


No Subject

Post 35

Jackruss a Grand Master of Tea and Toast, Keeper of the comfy chair, who is spending a year dead for tax reasons! DNA!

ahhh just the ticket I like the idea of the naughty step smiley - laugh


Who knows?

Post 36

Lanzababy - Guide Editor

actually, as Mala said earlier, toybox was only pretending, the question remains: Why?


Who knows?

Post 37

2legs - Hey, babe, take a walk on the wild side...

Why? Because if not then the only other option would have been to do so, and as to do so was what was done, then it can be determined, that the 'not', in terms of the qua 'not', is less 'not' and more 'do', hence the positive rather than negative option to which was a potential outcome ended up being the outcome at least in terms of our perception of the outcome which of course in itself may not be entirely accurate as we can but only hesitate a guess when we accept that 1 and 2 are indeed the same number viewed from differnt perspectives, which leads us to the inevitable conclution that 'not' and 'do' may whilst seeming to be polar opposites, in fact, and most probably at a quantum level, adopt entirely the same space and time, and therefore be both one and the same as each.


Who knows?

Post 38

Taff Agent of kaos


What???

smiley - bat


Who knows?

Post 39

Lanzababy - Guide Editor

¿por qué?


smiley - zensmiley - cool


Who knows?

Post 40

2legs - Hey, babe, take a walk on the wild side...

Or, in other words, a tengectual look at the two potential outcomes, that of positive and that of negative, of any given answer to any given question, whilst on the face of it may appear to be each at either extreme of a spectrum of potential outcomes, are, due to the quantum nature of the universe, potentially both, at the same time, one and the same, and each the other at that time also, leading to the total uncertanty of any given asnwer, as it may be both what that answer intially appears to be, yet be the entire opposite of what it appears to be, and yet symultainiously may be both of these possible outcomes at the very same time.... Which reminds me, I really must go check on the cat in the box downstairs


Key: Complain about this post