This is the Message Centre for Galaxy Babe - eclectic editor

LCROSS

Post 521

Deek

One for the BatS maybe, if it's in time.

On the 9 Oct the Centaur booster rocket, from the lunar mapping satellite LCROSS is going to be sent to impact with the Moon. It is directed at one of the permanently shaded craters at the Moon’s south pole. It is expected to throw up a plume of debris that can be sampled by the following LCROSS satellite on the same trajectory, and analysed just before it too, impacts.

The purpose is to determine, once and for all, if there is water lurking in the shadowed craters.

It’s not well placed for the UK, but the plume ‘may’ be seen from Earth with a ‘large‘ telescope.
It’s timed to occur with best viewing for the observatories on Hawaii but the Moon will be above the UK horizon at the time.

The impact is scheduled for around 11-30 UT, (12-30 BST), and the Moon will be between 5 and 13 degrees above the UK horizon. The exact time of the impact will be published before the event on the NASA LCROSS web page. The usual warnings about looking at the sky during daylight, with the Sun apply.


Harriot at Syon Park

Post 522

Deek

http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/brunel/A57973792

smiley - magic
smiley - cheers


Aquarius

Post 523

Galaxy Babe - eclectic editor

Hi Deke smiley - smiley
Your constellation on Aquarius has no reference to extrasolar planets, but I've located the info on 5 planets, including http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap980626.html which is only 15ly away. Did you omit them for a reason, or would you mind if I add them/a table of exoplanets to the entry? I'm updating all the constellations with exoplanets registered this year, and it's a smiley - bleep hard slog (I've already discovered one error at the exoplanets official website!)


Aquarius

Post 524

Deek

I don't mind any addition/correction you want to make.

I think the only reason I missed doing them was because it was one of the earlier ones I did. I wasn't 'into' ESP at the time. I just didn't think to put them in.

You might have alot more to do in the near future. There was something on TV about a new methodology/telescope that will be able to find Earth sized planets soon. I missed it so I didn't get the full story.


Aquarius

Post 525

Galaxy Babe - eclectic editor

smiley - biggrin
That's the reason I am trying to get all the constellations BANG up to date (today!)

smiley - rofl

It's the James Webb 'scope, looking for super Earthssmiley - ok

smiley - ok

(and smiley - ta for the permission, I know I didn't need it, but thought it respectful to ask...)

smiley - smooch


Aquarius

Post 526

Deek

Thanks.

smiley - oksmiley - smooch


Aquarius

Post 527

Galaxy Babe - eclectic editor

http://www.jwst.nasa.gov/

There you gosmiley - cheers

smiley - smooch


Aquarius

Post 528

Deek

Ah!

2014? Not as soon as all that then. I got the impression it was going to happen shortly.

smiley - cheers


Aquarius

Post 529

Galaxy Babe - eclectic editor

I wonder if it's this you meant: http://planetquest.jpl.nasa.gov/TPF/tpf_index.cfm


Aquarius

Post 530

Deek

Umm I'm not sure.

Thanks for the link as I don't think I've seen that before.

I think it might have been on the last Sky at Night. They were discussing the different arrays of space telescopes. To tell the truth, it's always on so late these days that I wait up all night for it and drop off to sleep when it's on so I only ever get to see the first half of it.

I've probably got it all wrong.

But that is interesting. It wasn't so long ago that it was reckoned impossible to 'see' an ESP.


Blobs?

Post 531

Deek

BTW
Have you any idea where I might find the 'Telescope Blob' used in the Post's Harriot piece? A57973792

I've looked through most of the blobs lists. If it's available and isn't someones copyright, I'd like to use it in the A/Soc pages.

Just can't find it though.


Aquarius update

Post 532

Galaxy Babe - eclectic editor

I just came to tell you A30109222 was donesmiley - biggrin and am asking your approval of the section before I report it as updated at the Curators forumsmiley - ok

I'll go get you that BLOBsmiley - run


Sky at Night

Post 533

Galaxy Babe - eclectic editor

Do you have 30 mins to watch http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00n58mj/The_Sky_at_Night_The_Great_Observatories/


Telescope blob

Post 534

Galaxy Babe - eclectic editor

The code you need is



and there's a telescope on my Occurrences of 42 in Astronomy entry A48150830


Sky at Night

Post 535

Galaxy Babe - eclectic editor

Some archive programmes are also available via http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/space/skyatnight/proginfo.shtml

smiley - star


Aquarius update

Post 536

Deek

I'm happy for you to make any changes you see fit.

Thanks for the blob number and the other references. I'll go through them bit by bit.

I've slotted in the 'scope blob in a couple of places. I quite like that onesmiley - ok I'll use the other one when I'm refreshing the page.

Thanks agin


Aquila update

Post 537

Galaxy Babe - eclectic editor

A29019332 for your approval smiley - smiley

By the way, the Orionids have started, (I think) they appear to be coming from Orion's general direction, we have seen two tonight already and I saw one last Friday when I was gazing at Jupiter. They could be strays, but as always, any clear night is a possibilitysmiley - ok

It's cold out there though, so wrap up warm if you're heading outsmiley - brr


Aquila update

Post 538

Deek

Aquila.
Looks good to mesmiley - ok

I'll try to get out tonight to have a look for Orionids. That bodes well for a farely good ZHR on the 20th. Every year that I've looked for them I've never seen more than one or two but the last couple of years the rate has, apparently been improving.


Aquila update

Post 539

Galaxy Babe - eclectic editor

Do you think the exoplanets deserve to be in with the constellations?


Aquila update

Post 540

Deek

Yes, I don’t see why not.

They are very much part of the overview that the constellation entries give. Are you having second thoughts about including them? I think they would make a rather ‘dry’ subject as an entry of their own.

The only pity is that they are not something that you can point a telescope at to ‘see’ like planets, moons and stars. Nevertheless they have their place in the scheme of things.


Key: Complain about this post