This is the Message Centre for Archangel Zax
A private word (the sequel)
GOD Started conversation Jun 14, 2000
Hello...!!!
Or should we just call you ACE from now on...
Mind you, I don't think Mike would be too impressed
Good work on bringing everyone back to Heaven, a nice idea
And there I was trying to think of a way of bringing people back without acting like a schoolmaster...
One thing though, if anyone else turns up who isn't part of the team, please be careful with the tone when directing them to the main angel thread. It did seem a little bit tart...
BTW Just when you think Moo Juice has gone off to the knackery, its back !!!
BTW2 You wanted to know what you said about the frogs...?
* Drum Roll, followed by a bongo solo... *
You said you LOVED frogs...!!!
* Nudge, Nudge, Wink, Double Wink... *
Not that earth-shattering granted, but when you see a double entendres around here, you jump on it for all its worth !!!
- Simply, High Spirited.
A private word (the sequel)
Archangel Zax Posted Jun 14, 2000
stop ragging on me! it's getting OLD. I'm being VERY nice in my posts, and have made a POINT to do so for a while now.. we both remember why.
i was VERY careful with how i replied to the non-angels at the roundup thread. if you read it, you will see that i was considerate, and SMILING. the fact that i asked them not to reply was the same as what i did to the Angels. i was trying to keep the thread from ending up 200 posts long. then there would be no point to having done it at all. i'm not only certain they understood, but i sure as HECK hope you didn't go around apologizing on their pages! That just gives them the idea that i MIGHT have been being rude when they didn't think so before!!
besides which, i plan to cultivate manxie, as he is living on IoM, where i hope to move to someday!
Next, my post to canadian girl said NO such thing! I have taken the liberty of cutting and pasting it here:
hey canadian girl! you're really getting around today! frogs and creepy crawlies, eh? nifty! someone's gotta love em!
There is NOTHING even slightly dirty in that, and as i just realized when i revisited the post, it was YOU who first suggested there MIGHT be!!! and *I* got blamed for it!!!!!!!!!!! You WEENIE! (or should i say YOU LECH!!!! (or should i say YOU GERALD!!!))
maybe you should leave the double entendreƩs for Angel/miss designario!
Geesh.
Leave me alone.
*takes all the alcohol, and retires to the corner to pout*
A private word (the sequel)
GOD Posted Jun 14, 2000
Oooh, tetchy aren't we...
WELL LET ME TELL YOU SOMETHING YOUNG LAD...
...that tends to frighten some less hardy souls...
You should try being poor old St.Peter. He has been wandering about in a daze after logging up three hours trying to fix up the New Users Page only to find that when he went to update it, the computer froze...
BTW You still said 'Love'Em'
- Moving In Mysterious Ways.
A private word (the sequel)
Archangel Zax Posted Jun 14, 2000
MY GOD.
yes, i said SOMEONE'S gotta love 'em. maybe in tight-lipped BRITAIN that means something twisted, but i know in FRANCE it would probably mean i was suggesting an entreƩ! Here in AMERICA, we keep the word love to mean love, and use boink, doink, jiggy, hoochie, stick, lay, plow, etc(you get the idea) to mean THE OTHER THING. you sick, sick, sick puppy.
i'm just getting really bored with the whole idea of people putting words in my mouth. i'm a very nice person, and i just don't like it. i make it a POINT not to do it to others, and i make a POINT of not being offensive. even when i blew up on the angel's page it wasn't anywhere NEAR that bad. if you read it, you can see that i was only harsh about jinx... i was polite to halo, confused but humorous with mummy, and even APOLOGIZED for being shortish and STATED why i was!!! if it had been Mike or thistle, no one would have cared- they're regularly a little prickly... but cuz it waz me, it turned into this huge issue. REALLY annoying.
anyway, i'm just trying to put it all behind, and get back to what i was, and it makes it tough with people saying "ah ah ah! don't do that! that's not nice!" just cuz THEY think i'm still being harsh.
enough.
you have your angels.
Bloke got his page back up, and emailed to say thanks and let us know he'll be around soon.
Benj emailed to say he got the email, and will work on his page as soon as he gets a chance.
moo juice is back, but hasn't said why he was 'banned'...
everyone else has pages in working order.
you may be interested in checking out http://www.egroups.com
you can start a private forum/homepage where you can have control over who sees posts. you can even set it up so people join by invitation only. that might be a good way to set up a TRULY private Angel message forum...
A private word (the sequel)
GOD Posted Jun 14, 2000
* Pats Zax on the back... *
Hey, I only offer things as suggestions. I know you have had a tough time of late, but I think you are making mountains out of molehills. Quite an acheivement in MY line of work, but it's not really cogent to the day-to-day activities of humanity...
We do appreciate your efforts...
Really
I think most people are merely joshing at the best of times. I know for certain that I never said anything here with real malice. Indeed the only person I have come across who I've found disagreeable, I won't even rise to his purile nature.
Surely, the mere fact that most of the still on-line angels turned up at Heaven was because of you...
To be honest, MY 'characteristics' are a little wearing after a while. The fact we still had angels around answering question et al was because of your tremendous input.
That's why they asked you to be an ACE...
BTW As far as the Jinx incident, it may have seemed like that because I started a new thread that I disagreed with what you said. Infact I did, but I simply didn't it was fair for any potential new angels have to deal with it.
BTW2 Moo Juice was presumably banned because of the 'Virus' you downloaded when you went to his old page. It concerned me at the time, but I didn't want to make an issue out of it.
A private word (the sequel)
Archangel Zax Posted Jun 16, 2000
do you have an opinion or decree about the new patronages? speak now... etc...
A private word (the sequel)
GOD Posted Jun 16, 2000
St.Peter - I thought, I would let you know that girleight posted elsewhere that she wants in on being a saint.
You may as well go with Crome101 (Bad Dancing) & Fashion Cat (Indolent Students) and one of Jimmiejaz's suggestions.
There is still a few general patronages left logged over at HIS office at heaven if you get stuck...
As there are six saints to induct, (canadian girl, Manxie, Chrome101, Fashion Cat, Jimmiejaz, girleight) you might like to ask another saint to help out by spliting up the ceremony into 2 parts...
Thanks
St.P.
A private word (the sequel)
Archangel Zax Posted Jun 17, 2000
i tell you what, why don't you just let tweet or someone do it... i'm not too into it right now...
do you mind telling me why you felt the need to tell the pledges that my halo has been 'tarnished'?
actually, don't bother. i don't think i want to even discuss it again.
A private word (the sequel)
GOD Posted Jun 17, 2000
* St.Peter puts his arm around Zax *
St.Peter - You seem overly sensitive at the moment, what's wrong ?
Surely, since you got into your chosen course you would be over the moon...
Don't bottle it up, you are amongst friends...
BTW I will put the ceremony together, because for one weekend I don't have to follow HIM into some of the more disreputable drinking establishments...
St.P.
A private word (the sequel)
Archangel Zax Posted Jun 19, 2000
i thought Archangels already WERE being judged by merit! what do you MEAN??? are you telling me i didn't deserve to be an Arch? who is this second angel that doesn't meet the criteria? what do you MEAN? you realize, don't you, that now you just implied to 30 some-odd saints that i am just an Archangel on a whim, don't you? that maybe i don't 'merit' it? what's up with that?
A private word (the sequel)
GOD Posted Jun 19, 2000
St.Peter - Sorry, I'm sorry it had to come out that way...
It is really about Ioreth. After about six weeks we haven't heard from her, she returns asking about her archangledom. It has made things a little awkward as I was already looking to ask one of the more regulars to be...
Given that Benji is the next saint, and we haven't her from her either I thought, I had better change the critera now before it just gets silly, plus it gives the others a little incentive...
As far as I'm concerned, you have more than earned it triple-fold...
St.P.
A private word (the sequel)
Archangel Zax Posted Jun 19, 2000
wow.... ok... well, there are a few points i think i should clarify.
first: i wasn't mad at you. i was being extremely sarcastic and tounge-in-cheek... i'm just really bad about putting the little smileydos in my posts. i'm working on that.
second. i STRONGLY agree that io shouldn't get an arch hood. she and jeltz and benji for various reasons have be incommunicado for far too many weeks to be considered. it would be an insult to ME, letting someone wear the title that didn't have to work for it, and it would be an insult to all of those hard working saints that HAVE been here, plugging away and kicking a$$ to help new members and old alike. i REALLY think you should find a nice way to tell io that, and let her know that she'll be considered for the next round if she shows as strong an interest as she did before. i'd be happy to do it for you- i have a bit of a friendship going with her, but i think it'd come easier from you.
third. my votes go to 1)tweet. she is next in line, she has been involved since the beginning, and she is always greeting and has helped SEVERAL newbies.
2) BED, for all the same reasons, tho he is NOT next in line. i know he's one of your favorites, but i think it would hurt tweet's feelings if you skipped her.
fourth. i am VERY sensitive about how i am portrayed in front of the newer saints. i've gotten some crap from a couple of them, and it really pisses me off. i have been here kicking along and trying to be your left hand man since literally the very beginning. it really puts my nose out of joint when the newbies are given reasons to consider me someone not worth respecting. having someone who just joined the site come along and become an angel is bad enough. i get really ticked when they are only here for the party and choose to talk crap about me in threads (saying i'm a bag of hot air, and am full of myself) even though i am always here trying to help newbies and angels alike!
then you go around saying stuff like that, and that other thing about my tarnished halo, and they feel justified. they haven't been around long enough to see just how involved i am, and they form their opinions from the example YOU set. to them, it's as though you all think the same thing, and i'm the nut that's just being humored. they think they're right, and i'm just too blind to see how you all 'really' think of me. do you see what i mean?
A private word (the sequel)
Archangel Zax Posted Jun 19, 2000
oh, i also vote for bruce, but i doubt he'd wear the title.. 's ok, it can be honorary!
A private word (the sequel)
GOD Posted Jun 19, 2000
St.Peter - Well I think we're getting somewhere...
The only reason I say the little asides about you is out of affection, and I am 90% sure the others do too, but it really bother's you. So I will stop it - O.K ?
As far as Ioreth goes, I will speak to her, depending if she is alright with it, I will find somebody else...
(As I think it is a little late to go back on my word, even if she doesn't really doesn't deserve it...)
As far as who would get it otherwise. I would have gone with BED next, mainly because of all the saints bar you, his name pops up the most when it comes to greeting people, but as Tweetie is one of the few who makes a point of posting regularly to the apps. I think she would be the next, just because she has been around a bit longer than BED...
St.P.
A private word (the sequel)
Archangel Zax Posted Jun 19, 2000
well, i know what you're saying.. i think you'd be really wrong to pass her up in favor of bed. he's good, but not better. she does her fair share of greeting- she just doesn't talk about it as much as the rest of us. she's also very active in the rest of the site, and always advertising and spreading the word about us.
no, bed is good, but not better. tweet may not seem ready, but if she's passed over, it should only be for someone of the calibre of bruce. after the past several weeks, i don't think there's a single person on the site that deserves arching more!! i think you would get the same response from bed AND tweet!
that's my final vote... not that it matters. i think bruce deserves it... and it's so much more USEFUL than that plaque you were talking about getting him!!
A private word (the sequel)
GOD Posted Jun 19, 2000
St.Peter - You had better hope HE doesn't hear that !!!
BTW forgive if I seem like one of Jesters faithful, but who is Oli ???
And, who are the remaining saints not to log-in ?
St.P.
A private word (the sequel)
Archangel Zax Posted Jun 19, 2000
oli?? uh? huh? OH! olli- the guy that popped in on the roundup thread! I have no idea. i figured i'd let someone else tell him to go hang... but aparently ignoring him worked just as well!
The last two we're waiting on are Angel/Miss Designario, Benji, and Techni. Angel is on her way, tweet says. Benj had trouple with the skins, and just gotaccess to his page on saturday.. i'm expecting him any moment. Techni is not responding- he's probably on vacation.
girleight is a new angel, and she hasn't poppped back yet(if you remember she was an interloper). she was supposed to apply for an angel, not angelhood... she has no idea what it's about, and is almost-but not quite-hostile about it... i've tried to help. she may not want the sainthood.
ok, i have to go. later!
A private word (the sequel)
GOD Posted Jun 21, 2000
St.Peter - I have spoken with Ioreth and she has agreed that someone else should get an opportunity to be an Archangel before her...
... but officially the choice hasn't been made yet
* nudge, nudge, very big wink, wink *
St.P.
Key: Complain about this post
A private word (the sequel)
- 1: GOD (Jun 14, 2000)
- 2: Archangel Zax (Jun 14, 2000)
- 3: GOD (Jun 14, 2000)
- 4: Archangel Zax (Jun 14, 2000)
- 5: GOD (Jun 14, 2000)
- 6: Archangel Zax (Jun 16, 2000)
- 7: GOD (Jun 16, 2000)
- 8: GOD (Jun 16, 2000)
- 9: Archangel Zax (Jun 17, 2000)
- 10: GOD (Jun 17, 2000)
- 11: Archangel Zax (Jun 17, 2000)
- 12: Archangel Zax (Jun 19, 2000)
- 13: GOD (Jun 19, 2000)
- 14: Archangel Zax (Jun 19, 2000)
- 15: Archangel Zax (Jun 19, 2000)
- 16: GOD (Jun 19, 2000)
- 17: Archangel Zax (Jun 19, 2000)
- 18: GOD (Jun 19, 2000)
- 19: Archangel Zax (Jun 19, 2000)
- 20: GOD (Jun 21, 2000)
More Conversations for Archangel Zax
Write an Entry
"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is a wholly remarkable book. It has been compiled and recompiled many times and under many different editorships. It contains contributions from countless numbers of travellers and researchers."