A Conversation for Ask h2g2

Pedants thread

Post 41

azahar

Well, you *could* always tell him to p*ss off, Teasswill! smiley - winkeye

I think I am a bit of an anti-pedant myself. I love the English language and it is my job to teach it. Really I think what I enjoy most is having as much fun with it as I can.

az


Pedants thread

Post 42

Stealth "Jack" Azathoth

Oi! Mi joke were a funny. why 'as you not bin laffing at it?!!

*Miss uzing inglish outta pro test*

smiley - peacedove


Pedants thread

Post 43

You can call me TC

Everyone is pedantic about something, surely - we shouldn't limit this thread to the grammar pedants.

As a mother, I of course support the school of thought whereby "Because" is a sentence in itself.

As a pedant, I cringe at that thought.


Pedants thread

Post 44

A Super Furry Animal

Why amn't I subscribed to this thread already?

RFsmiley - evilgrin


Pedants thread

Post 45

Teasswill

Am I being pedantic in stacking the dishwasher just so?


Pedants thread

Post 46

You can call me TC

In a way, yes. With me it's the way you hang out the washing and take it down again. It's like lots of things - really, you're right, but most people just can't be bothered to do it that way.

However, with grammar, it's difficult to explain why things are wrong because not only the will to comply is missing, but also the very basic knowledge seems to have got lost, too. Simple things like the verb agreeing with the noun, for example.


Pedants thread

Post 47

Wand'rin star

(as in Spinks' error:post 28)Grammatical pedantry dictates that "None of us IS perfect."
'Everyone' also needs a singular verb, even if it refers to the whole population of the world. smiley - starsmiley - star


Pedants thread

Post 48

The Groob

Thanks wandrin. I was beginning to wonder if that was every gonna get noticed.


Pedants thread

Post 49

The Groob

OH, and I chucked in a possessive "it's" too.


Pedants thread

Post 50

Fathom


Allowing for "gonna" as a colloquialism, I believe you should have used "ever" rather than "every" in post 48.

In post 49 a true pedant would suggest that a comma is not required before the word 'and'.

F


Pedants thread

Post 51

Mu Beta

A slightly less pedantic pedant would also point out that the second letter of 'oh' is rarely capitalised. smiley - winkeye

B


Pedants thread

Post 52

Orcus

An even more pedantic peasant than that might point out that Wandrin' should have had an intial capital since it is a proper noun.


Pedants thread

Post 53

Fathom


I suspect you meant 'initial' there Orcus.

I notice that Wand'rin is spelt as shown here and not as shown in any of the previous posts. I am not sure, however, if I should have used 'previous' in that context or if, perhaps, I should have used 'earlier'.

F


Pedants thread

Post 54

kea ~ Far out in the uncharted backwaters of the unfashionable end of the western spiral arm of the Galaxy lies a small, unregarded but very well read blue and white website

What is wrong with the comma after the OH?


Pedants thread

Post 55

Fathom


A comma designates a short pause in a sentence, a breathing space if you like, or to separate a sub-clause as I have just done. There is such a pause after the 'OH' but it is considered bad practice to place a comma before 'and' except where the 'and' follows a sub-clause. There's no reason for this though; it's just being pedantic.

smiley - smiley

F


Pedants thread

Post 56

kea ~ Far out in the uncharted backwaters of the unfashionable end of the western spiral arm of the Galaxy lies a small, unregarded but very well read blue and white website

So it's not so much that it is undesirable to place a comma after the 'OH' as before the 'and'?

For instance Spinks could have said "OH, I chucked in a possessive "it's" too".

(I'm not sure where that last fullstop should have gond btw).


Pedants thread

Post 57

Mrs Zen

*subscribes*

Hell, no, I am going to post.

If it one has different pedantries for written and spoken English, (which is a fairly major assumption in the first place), is there a new kind of English arising which is 'Internet English' with different standards of pedantry? If so, wouldn't it include smileys?

Ben


Pedants thread

Post 58

Hoovooloo

The problem with positing an incipient internet pedantry is that it possibly fallaciously presupposes the existence of an agreed standard about which to be pedantic.

While there are certain elements of netiquette on which almost all agree - pretty much everyone frowns on PEOPLE WHO SHOUT EVERYTHING THEY SAY, for instance - there would appear to be very little agreement over anything more... structural, shall we say.

I mean, for heaven's sake, there's not even agreement over what constitutes the most basic, fundamental element of internet communications, the smiley. Do you use two characters? smiley - smiley Or three? smiley - smiley

This is of course due to loose, paradoxically DISconnected way the internet evolved as a medium for mass communication. There is no single, central, overarching authority like Johnson's dictionary, Fowler's Abusage, or the Academie Francaise. And there never, ever will be. As a result, one can no more be pedantic about "correct" usage of Internet English than one could be pedantic about the "correct" style of trouser or length of skirt. You can only correct your friends, because what's right among your own circle could be the most appalling faux pas outside it.

En't English brilliant?

H.



Pedants thread

Post 59

Noggin the Nog

The fullstop is correctly placed, as the words within the quotation marks are not a complete sentence. If they were the fullstop would go inside the quotation marks.

Noggin


Pedants thread

Post 60

Mu Beta

Isn't the correct length of skirt 'as short as possible'?

B


Key: Complain about this post

Write an Entry

"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is a wholly remarkable book. It has been compiled and recompiled many times and under many different editorships. It contains contributions from countless numbers of travellers and researchers."

Write an entry
Read more