A Conversation for Miscellaneous Chat
probability of everything?
Blartyfartpants Posted May 22, 2001
Footnote:
Various interstellar messaging companies suceeded in adapting improbability physics to there stamps.The upshot of this being that however improbable, your message/letter would actually get to its destination quite possibly before you actually sent it.
This opened a whole new genre for pan galactic lawyers to exploit.
However as there bills for services rendered actually arrived before they rendered any services, cheques were gratefully recieved and bills were put in the bin.
Footnote:Footnote:
Quite soon after the PanGalactic Lawyers Institute became destitute,needing funds they sold many of their members into manual labour camps.(they didn't last long)
Footnote:Footnote:Footnote:
Soon after the re-introduction of the sub-etha postage stamp all became well.
Blarty - keeper of the orange sash / whats this 42 all about then what was the question ?
probability of everything?
Og the Caveman and Befriender of NanoChickens Posted May 29, 2001
AAAARRRRGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHH!!!!
MY BRAIN!!!!!
probability of everything?
Kyacamuffin (Formerly the Toxin Avenger) Posted May 29, 2001
How can the probability of anything be greater than 1, greater than absolute certainty?
Plus, how can you square infinity, when infinity is not a number, just a concept. Squaring infinity is like squaring an Elephant, or your Lunch...
(okay, Lunch and Elephants aren't concepts, but I like to think...)
If a train leaves London at 12:45 for Birmingham and travels at an average speed of 60mph, and, at the same time a train leave Birmingham for London and travels at an average speed of 75mph, and both trains will cross at 13:45, how may passengers in total will get to Leeds, and what colour will they be, and what shape?
(... that it points out the absurdity of squaring a concept, or squaring fashion... that's better, I should have used squaring fashion)
What Is fashion Squared....
probability of everything?
tacsatduck- beware the <sheep> lie Posted May 29, 2001
I think if you tried to square an elephant you might run into a messy situation.
As far as the train is concerned I think it would be much more interesting if the second train was leaving from Birmingham, AL in the US then the onsets would be
Passengers to Leeds 12% of those trying to get there. This is all dependent on seats being able to become flotation devices
57% will be slightly blue
13% will be very pale
27% on the purple side
3% slightly greenish brown
78% will be flatter then when they left
12% will become pear like
9% will turn completely round like the blueberry girl from Willie Wonka's chocolate factory
1% will turn into super models and work for fashion mags
probability of everything?
Mycroft Posted May 29, 2001
Why this Luddite fixation with things making sense? Logical argument has no place in a multiverse where everything is possible, and I'll prove it with logic, dagnammit!
Everything is possible and all possible things occur in the multiverse, therefore the probability of the probability of anything being greater than 1 is itself 1. QED.
Anyone for elephant squares?
probability of everything?
Solomon Posted May 30, 2001
I'd like an elephant sandwich, but I appear to be out of bread.
probability of everything?
Mother of God, Empress of the Universe Posted May 30, 2001
I think I have some bread in my trunk...
probability of everything?
Mac (Keeper of indecision) Posted May 30, 2001
*small popping sound as a hole opens up in the side of mac's brain,out of which his brain jumps out,screaming*
probability of everything?
Aaron O'Keefe the anti-pajama man (ACE) Posted May 30, 2001
And what is it then that. . .then that. . .that then. What exactly is "then?" Is it what was once my "now," so now it is your "then," now? If that be the case then, as I write this now, which is earlier than any time you might read it then, when you read what I have written now is a less "then" than your "then" is to you during your "now," which is a "will be" to your "now" which is a "then" to my "once was." So then, given this logic as sound then, to have your "then" as a "now" and my "now" as a "once was," never can we assume that anything that "once was" "will be" "now." Now then, what was said was that the "now then" "will be" "now" "once and for all" earlier or later than the "then" "now." Depending on your point of view "now" and "then."
So now and then, my point of view has it, that a way of life "then" or even "now" will eventually be a "once was" and passe to all involved both then and now and probably ever will be. Given that, "then" and "now" being earlier than "once was" and "will be" ever, but later than "now and again" and "there once was a guy," any thing that happens in the now will be "then" and then to the "now" and "will be," but a "will be" to the "then" and "once was." Again point of view dependent on what was then a "now" and what even earlier than the now was the "will be." Unfortunately like all good Zen laxatives that to must pass then, and the result is a "then" and a "once was" to the earlier "now" and "will be." Once and for all.
probability of everything?
Mycroft Posted May 30, 2001
I couldn't have said it better myself, Aaron, except in that infinity of universes where I actually did.
probability of everything?
Mycroft Posted May 31, 2001
Cheer up - there's an infinity of universes out there where this stuff makes sense, and another infinity where you don't get hangovers.
probability of everything?
Aaron O'Keefe the anti-pajama man (ACE) Posted May 31, 2001
But thankfully we aren't goldfish in any of these universes. A goldfish's memory span is a tiny 3 seconds long. When it thinks it's hungry it only ever remember's being hungry, when it's content it only remembers being content, and when it rememberes only dying while it is dying, in this span of resignation in any of the infintely larger universes out there, from a goldfish's it doesn't matter to squat. . .or it does in other universes, or it won't in other universes, or it will in others. . . I have gone crosseyed.
probability of everything?
Og the Caveman and Befriender of NanoChickens Posted Jun 8, 2001
The problem is that we ARE goldfish in an inumerable amount of universes. And therefore we are also llamas in a few too! And not only that...there are some universes where we are llamas and time is running backwards!! So...if we get in inter-universal contact with our other 'llama-selves' we can ask them with the help of some sort of llama-english communication device we can, in effect, ask them about our future!!
We could just ask our 'human-selves' in another univers, but llamas are a lot more co-operative when it comes to communication to alternate universes.
probability of everything?
Og the Caveman and Befriender of NanoChickens Posted Jun 8, 2001
The problem is that we ARE goldfish in an inumerable amount of universes. And therefore we are also llamas in a few too! And not only that...there are some universes where we are llamas and time is running backwards!! So...if we get in inter-universal contact with our other 'llama-selves' we can ask them with the help of some sort of llama-english communication device we can, in effect, ask them about our future!!
We could just ask our 'human-selves' in another universe, but llamas are a lot more co-operative when it comes to communication to alternate universes.
probability of everything?
Aaron O'Keefe the anti-pajama man (ACE) Posted Jun 8, 2001
given your last post. . .in all universes and this one especially. . . I think I have wet myself. Truely a figment of universal statistics
probability of everything?
Ruppinger ~ zaphodista ~ former keeper of vegan affairs ~ new keeper of rainbows, until the old one shows up again Posted Jun 9, 2001
probability of everything?
Aaron O'Keefe the anti-pajama man (ACE) Posted Jun 9, 2001
And how is it Ruppinger that we would err?
Key: Complain about this post
probability of everything?
- 21: Blartyfartpants (May 22, 2001)
- 22: Og the Caveman and Befriender of NanoChickens (May 29, 2001)
- 23: Kyacamuffin (Formerly the Toxin Avenger) (May 29, 2001)
- 24: Mother of God, Empress of the Universe (May 29, 2001)
- 25: tacsatduck- beware the <sheep> lie (May 29, 2001)
- 26: Mycroft (May 29, 2001)
- 27: Solomon (May 30, 2001)
- 28: Mother of God, Empress of the Universe (May 30, 2001)
- 29: Mac (Keeper of indecision) (May 30, 2001)
- 30: Aaron O'Keefe the anti-pajama man (ACE) (May 30, 2001)
- 31: Mycroft (May 30, 2001)
- 32: Aaron O'Keefe the anti-pajama man (ACE) (May 30, 2001)
- 33: Mother of God, Empress of the Universe (May 31, 2001)
- 34: Mycroft (May 31, 2001)
- 35: Aaron O'Keefe the anti-pajama man (ACE) (May 31, 2001)
- 36: Og the Caveman and Befriender of NanoChickens (Jun 8, 2001)
- 37: Og the Caveman and Befriender of NanoChickens (Jun 8, 2001)
- 38: Aaron O'Keefe the anti-pajama man (ACE) (Jun 8, 2001)
- 39: Ruppinger ~ zaphodista ~ former keeper of vegan affairs ~ new keeper of rainbows, until the old one shows up again (Jun 9, 2001)
- 40: Aaron O'Keefe the anti-pajama man (ACE) (Jun 9, 2001)
More Conversations for Miscellaneous Chat
Write an Entry
"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is a wholly remarkable book. It has been compiled and recompiled many times and under many different editorships. It contains contributions from countless numbers of travellers and researchers."