A Conversation for The Myth Of 42 [(5-3+0+5) * (6+0) = 42]

always open to correction...

Post 1

Researcher 208309

...pref by a feisty redhead in short skirt and black boots wielding a sharp pointy thing.

I submit (-2+0+8)*(-3+0!+9) = 42. Are there extra points for them being in the right order and for using 0!?


always open to correction...

Post 2

Jeremy (trying to find his way back to dinner)

Yes, you get 42 extra points (just like anybody else) smiley - winkeye


always open to correction...

Post 3

Potholer

Avoiding factorials, there's
(2+0*8)*(30-9) => 42
or the similar
2*(0*8+30-9) => 42


always open to correction...

Post 4

Researcher 208309

but I like factorials!!!!!!!!!!smiley - tongueout!!!!!!!!!!!!!


always open to correction...

Post 5

Researcher 208309

I don’t think Mr Thorpe would have allowed making 30 out of 3 and 0, tempting though it might be.

Mr Thorpe was a mild mannered old buffer, ex of Nottingham Boys’ High School who for some reason found himself for a term or two thrown into the bear pit of Beeston Fields County Secondary School. I’m back in the 1950s now – 1957 to be precise, Class 3A in the kitchen block.

He tried to keep us quiet by challenging us to form equations from any set of four numbers he wrote up on the black board. Happy days. It was Mr Thorpe that came to mind when I was playing with my researcher number.

It was he that told us of perfect numbers about which I must do a Guide Entry one day. It was with the factors of 42 (not a perfect number, whatever its other qualities) that I began my quest earlier in the week.

(-2+0+8)*(-3+0!+9)


always open to correction...

Post 6

Pimms

Surprised to find there isn't an entry on Perfect numbers already. Fill that gap in the guide! smiley - biggrin


always open to correction...

Post 7

Argon0 (50 and feeling it - back for a bit)

Well done Boring Bear - yeah !'s are cool....

Did anybody else call 4! "Four Shriek" when at school?

Welcome to the Knights of the DoQuaDecahedric table...


always open to correction...

Post 8

AK - fancy that!

did I here gap in the guide?
its A1293365
I'll put it on there... if need be... yeah I guess I will


always open to correction...

Post 9

Pimms

smiley - applause well done AK


always open to correction...

Post 10

Argon0 (50 and feeling it - back for a bit)

smiley - coolsmiley - erm

My mistake - wrong table - you should be at the DoQuaDecaGONIC table - over there...


always open to correction...

Post 11

AK - fancy that!

You knwo a 42 sided polyhedric table would be pretty cool... just to look at... but its better as a polygon.


always open to correction...

Post 12

Argon0 (50 and feeling it - back for a bit)

Yeah, but tricky to sit at ...


always open to correction...

Post 13

AK - fancy that!

Thats why it would be cool smiley - smiley


always open to correction...

Post 14

Argon0 (50 and feeling it - back for a bit)

wonder if that'd be 3D or 42D?


always open to correction...

Post 15

AK - fancy that!

3D... 42D would be
1.point
2.line
3.plane
4.up and down
5-42 dunno
but we could imagine a 42 sided polyhedron, if we had the right shapes we could make one but no one knows how to put it together...


always open to correction...

Post 16

Argon0 (50 and feeling it - back for a bit)

smiley - erm

Point is NO dimensional...
Line is 1D
Plane is 2D
3D - Up and Down and 2D
Time = 4D (e.g.)
5-42D = rolled up dimensions...smiley - biggrin


Key: Complain about this post