This is the Message Centre for Pierre de la Mer ~ sometimes slightly worried but never panicking ~

Interesting

Post 1

Pierre de la Mer ~ sometimes slightly worried but never panicking ~

I have already posted this link in another thread but thought I should give more hootooers the opportunity of reading this:

http://martinbelam.com/2015/i-tell-you/

smiley - pirate


Interesting

Post 2

Sho - employed again!

that is such an excellent piece


Interesting

Post 3

Pierre de la Mer ~ sometimes slightly worried but never panicking ~

What can I say? He learned from the best smiley - biggrin

smiley - pirate


Interesting

Post 4

lil ~ Auntie Giggles with added login ~ returned


Oooh! smiley - bigeyes

Nick Reynolds even raised his head above the parapet smiley - lurk


smiley - biggrin



Interesting

Post 5

Ancient Brit

http://h2g2.com/edited_entry/A550955


Interesting

Post 6

paulh, vaccinated against the Omigod Variant

What should we take away after reading the article in question? That we need to be nicer to he people who care the most about this site? [true] That our work on guide entries is what matters to the web as a whole? [true] That, as hard as it might be for some of us, we need to welcome change?[true] That with so many other communities being axed by online media, we have the opportunity to pick up some of the people who used to flock to them? [arguable, but how can we send them overtures?]

We function as an online community, but we are also a source of content for people surfing the Net. The two parts are joined at the hip. Are we an exception to the author's point? If so, how did we escape?


Interesting

Post 7

Pierre de la Mer ~ sometimes slightly worried but never panicking ~

We are an exception - well, at least to a degree.
But I don't think that is important.
The points you make are far more important, paulh.
Only yesterday I was reminded of the dysfunctionality of the "Who's Online"-feature. We discussed this at great length a while back and I think I remember some rather hard criticism - until we realized that you can't demand the same service from volunteers on your own site as you could when the service was provided by paid BBC-employees.

(And how important is the "Who's Online"-feature anyway?)

smiley - pirate


Interesting

Post 8

Lanzababy - Guide Editor

I am not sure you can demand anything, unless you're paying for a service, and the service agreement you signed and pay for has criteria that are not being met. Then you could withhold payment, change providers, or complain.

But some people just love to complain it seems, and feel it is their duty. We (the volunteers) just try our best with limited means.

Take a look at how much time and goodwill our hardworking Guide Editors are putting into the site. They're working constantly, for no reward. They're just kind hearted, generous people who are doing their very best.


Interesting

Post 9

Pierre de la Mer ~ sometimes slightly worried but never panicking ~

My point exactly, Lanzababy, but I should have worded it differently. Instead of "you can't demand the same service" I should have written something like "of course you can't expect the same service".
And followed that up with "what would make you think you have any right to do so?"

smiley - pirate


Interesting

Post 10

Lanzababy - Guide Editor

I knew what you meant, my dear, and I was sort of adding my smiley - 2cents

smiley - hug


Interesting

Post 11

paulh, vaccinated against the Omigod Variant

The Guide Editors have my thanks. smiley - applause


Key: Complain about this post