A Conversation for Ask h2g2

Stupid users

Post 21

Bruce

"Look out! Behind you - ooh too late" as my old mum used to say.


;^)#


Stupid users

Post 22

Si

smiley - smiley

How did you create him so quickly?


Stupid users

Post 23

Bruce

TDV might think they have 17000 users, but in reality 15,963 are mine - I'm sure they'll come in handy one day.

btw I'm sure thats a false beard Harry was wearing.


;^)#
hotmail


Stupid users

Post 24

Jim Lynn

Fantastic! Thanks, Si, that's exactly the piece to which I was referring.


Stupid users

Post 25

Cheerful Dragon

I'm good at C++ (amongst other languages), know a bit about hardware, got an 'A' grade for English Literature 'O' level, am fairly well read in the classics AND I can program our video without using Videoplus. So there!


Stupid users

Post 26

Cheerful Dragon

I used to work for a company where there was very little communication between the software team and the hardware team. In fact, the hardware team used to take the attitude that certain things should be detected and dealt with by the software, because it was easier to do it that way than to change the circuits. This lead to the following 'joke':

How many hardware engineers does it take to change a light bulb? None, we'll do it in the software.
How many software engineers does it take to change a light bulb? None, it's a hardware problem.

smiley - smiley


Stupid users

Post 27

Cheerful Dragon

Having read the book and then seen the film, I reckon the films a pretty good adaptation and I prefer its ending to the ending in the book.

Completely off the subject of computer users. Can anyone explain why some films which are book adaptations bear so little relation to the book? At least in the musical 'Oliver' they had the decency to say 'Loosely based on a book by Charles Dickens'. And it was a closer adaptation than some I've seen!


Stupid users

Post 28

Cheerful Dragon

Microsoft wouldn't need so many helplines if their products weren't so bug-ridden and such utter cr*p!


Stupid users

Post 29

Jim Lynn

It's because translation from one medium to another always means changing things. There are things which work perfectly in a novel which just won't work in a film. Interior monologue is a good example. It's fine in a book, but in a film it's usually awkward.

As proof, I cite David Lynch's adaptation of 'Dune', a film in which the whole story is told through voiceover (at least, that's how it seems).


Stupid users

Post 30

Bruce

Dont forget that the book has to be 'fitted' to a suitable movie length. Even allowing for the 'a picture is worth a thousand words' factor most books would be too long & therefore too expensive for a straight convesion to a movie.

;^)#


Stupid users

Post 31

Jax

The IT in our Company are superb ....

.............. that is if you are around tomorrow and don't need your problem sorting out straight away! We have a tendancy to employ small diminutive men who carry the look "if you shout at me again I'll cry"!!! smiley - sadface

The best one in our place at the moment is they are rebuilding everyone's PC's - unfortunately after the rebuild they seem to crash! There is no way am I letting anyone near mine - it works fine and I am a firm believer in the old saying "If it ain't broke don't fix it!"


Stupid users

Post 32

Ginger The Feisty

Pretending to be Harry didn't fool me for a second - He could never cope with logging onto the internet let alone using forums!


Stupid users

Post 33

Bruce

ahhh well I guess the false beard was a waste of time then.


;^)#


Stupid users

Post 34

Ginger The Feisty

I seem to remember he had a moustache but don't remember a beard! You would to have had a really loud honking laugh as well!

Good try though!
smiley - smiley


Stupid users

Post 35

Cheerful Dragon

I appreciate the facts given in the previous two replies. But it doesn't explain why some 'adaptations' bear no more resemblance to the book they were adapted from than the use of the names of the main characters.


Stupid users

Post 36

Bruce

errr, umm, artistic license??


;^)#


Stupid users

Post 37

Paul the Brake

Have no fear I read the other day that windows might be obsolete in four years time and we might be using Lynux as our OS


Stupid users

Post 38

Paul the Brake

I should of added that a lot of people are useing lynux allready


Stupid users

Post 39

Anonymouse

I understand the gnome project is running quite well, and there's another (KDE?) which is even incorporating the drag-n-drop function. Personally I generally boot to linux when I've had -quite- enough GUI thankyouverymuch. I haven't adjusted Xwin to my 'new' machine yet... (erm.. new=15months)

So sue me. I grew up on a VAX. smiley - winkeye


Stupid users

Post 40

Kallahan

I was talking to an IT guy and he was helping a stupid user turns out the users problem was that he or she had not turned ether the monitor or the computer on


Key: Complain about this post