A Conversation for Miscellaneous Chat
a revolutionary look at evolutionary myths
Xordin the curious Started conversation May 2, 2001
If we evolved from apes, because we are evolutionarily better at living, how come there still are apes?
a revolutionary look at evolutionary myths
Mund Posted May 2, 2001
I suspect I'm going to regret this, but here goes...
Today's apes are our cousins, not our ancestors.
A species may evolve by adaptation to a new environment, in which case the species it evolves from may carry on quite happily in the old, neighbouring environment.
There's lots more, but let's see how the conversation develops.
a revolutionary look at evolutionary myths
Mund Posted May 2, 2001
And then there's the strange idea that evolution is directed towards the more complex, more interesting creatures (like us, strangely enough) when most of the species which have ever existed, still developing at an enormously fast rate, and probably making up the vast majority of the earth's biomass despite their tiny individual size... are bacteria.
a revolutionary look at evolutionary myths
Xordin the curious Posted May 4, 2001
which brings me to another point, if its all about survival of the fittest, what's wrong with human beings finishing off all the other ones?
a revolutionary look at evolutionary myths
Mund Posted May 4, 2001
No, that's a different theory - suicide of the most arrogant.
a revolutionary look at evolutionary myths
Martin Harper Posted May 8, 2001
or, to paraphrase Xordin's question...
"If it's all about E=mc², what's wrong with dropping a nuke on the White House?"
Yep: there's still something about people with an 'X' at the start of their name
a revolutionary look at evolutionary myths
Mund Posted May 9, 2001
So is anbody interested in evolution or anything?
a revolutionary look at evolutionary myths
xyroth Posted May 12, 2001
sure am. evolution keeps happening, be it in website design, programming, individual belief systems, or in nature generally. wonderfull stuff.
a revolutionary look at evolutionary myths
Smirnoff Mule Posted May 13, 2001
A couple of years ago i read about the discovery of a chimp's skull from couple of million years ago. Judging by the angle the vertebrate attached to the skull, this chimp had evolved to be primarily a biped. They must have evolved back onto all fours in the intervening millennia. I suspect humans are heading the same way.
a revolutionary look at evolutionary myths
Mund Posted May 13, 2001
Maybe this creature was as much a "chimp" as Lucy was a "man". It ain't that simple.
simple
Trinkspark Posted May 14, 2001
we didn't necisarrily adapt to a new environment from apes, but possibly had a point mutation or many of them.. to becauome something completely different and as we know more than one thing can live in the same similar environment, thus we both exist.
Key: Complain about this post
a revolutionary look at evolutionary myths
- 1: Xordin the curious (May 2, 2001)
- 2: Mund (May 2, 2001)
- 3: Mund (May 2, 2001)
- 4: xyroth (May 3, 2001)
- 5: Xordin the curious (May 4, 2001)
- 6: Mund (May 4, 2001)
- 7: Martin Harper (May 8, 2001)
- 8: xyroth (May 9, 2001)
- 9: Mund (May 9, 2001)
- 10: xyroth (May 12, 2001)
- 11: Smirnoff Mule (May 13, 2001)
- 12: Mund (May 13, 2001)
- 13: Trinkspark (May 14, 2001)
More Conversations for Miscellaneous Chat
Write an Entry
"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is a wholly remarkable book. It has been compiled and recompiled many times and under many different editorships. It contains contributions from countless numbers of travellers and researchers."