A Conversation for Aircraft Spotting
Peer Review: A665958 - Aircraft Spotting
sidsaucer Started conversation Jan 29, 2002
Entry: Aircraft Spotting - A665958
Author: sidsaucer - U187806
This entry has attracted no critical reactions during the two months it has been available. I would hope that it can be assessed soon so that understanding of the hobby can increase before several English and Dutch aircraft spotters face trials in Greece, where the hobby has yet to catch-on to any significant extent.
A665958 - Aircraft Spotting
Felonious Monk - h2g2s very own Bogeyman Posted Feb 2, 2002
Hi,
I quite liked the entry, with the caveats that:
* it could do with some more formatting and GuideML to give it some visual structure;
* the allusions to the Guide (dead tree version) got a bit wearing after a while and could do with being thinned out.
Apart from that, a good entry.
The FM
A665958 - Aircraft Spotting
Spelugx the Beige, Wizard, Perl, Thaumatologically Challenged Posted Feb 10, 2002
This could be a really good article, but I agree with FM that the alliusions to the orig. guide were wearing. One thing that is noted in the Writing-Guidelines is that forcibly trying to be humourous can be well... trying.
A665958 - Aircraft Spotting
Silverfish Posted Feb 13, 2002
Basically I agree with Felonius Monk, and S'pe;lug:x, that GuideML would certainly improve this, and the h2g2 references are excessive.
Additionally, you mention that "In the UK for example an Air Observer Corps was formed and latterly its members would have played an important role in the event of a nuclear attack occurring against the United Kingdom."
It isn't clear how in a nuclear attack Plane Spotting would be useful, as you don't explain, how. Also you mention that AOC, but don't mention why they were set up, or when. I suspect that they would have been formed in one of the 2 world wars, but you do not say. Also I don't think that the word 'latterly' adds anything to the sentence, when "...its members would have played an important role...", seems to express what you mean just as well.
I think this has the making of a good edited entry, although I don't think this is ready yet.
A665958 - Aircraft Spotting
Spelugx the Beige, Wizard, Perl, Thaumatologically Challenged Posted Feb 15, 2002
One comment of Silverfish's comments: GuideML is *NOT* as necessity, even though many scouts act like it is, clear formatting can still be done in plain text.
For example
THIS IS A HEADING
=================
This is a subheading
--------------------
This is a footnote[1].
To Scouts: surely asking for GuideML can put people off? Exactly what we don't need.
----
[1] Hello World!
A665958 - Aircraft Spotting
sidsaucer Posted Feb 16, 2002
Clearly details of the Air Observer Corps could be expanded, but preferably in a separate entry by a former member of the Corps. I simply find it interesting that a Corps that originated with a defensive requirement to visually identify threats from the air, developed within a generation, into something that was effectively a secret service waiting to assist survivors of nuclear attacks particularly those intended to have retreated to official bunkers. How much of that AOC history is in the public domain I do not know.
The messages advocating GML strike me as somewhat authoritarian. How long does that language take to learn and what would be the benefits to readers of altering the format of entries such as this one to GML?
A665958 - Aircraft Spotting
Cloviscat Posted Feb 20, 2002
Hi sidsaucer
As a non-IT type person, I can guarantee that GuideML *is* easy and does not have to be learnt as such. I just crib from http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/alabaster/SubEditors-GuideML whenever I need it.
As a scout, looking at whoever knows how many entries a month, a clearly formatted entry can make the difference between your entry being given the attentionit (hopefully) deserves. The more it looks like a standard edited entry, the easier it is for us to envisage picking it. It's not that we're lazy (necessarily!) just busy busy volunteers.
Having said that, the point made above about using other forms of layout if you don't want to give the GuideML a try are just fine.
Hope this helps
A665958 - Aircraft Spotting
Galen Posted Feb 20, 2002
i like the entry quite a bit except for the multiple attemps to be funny and the multiple mentions of DNA's books. if that was taken care of, i would go for it right away
A665958 - Aircraft Spotting
Monsignore Pizzafunghi Bosselese Posted Feb 20, 2002
Seeing that there *is* an Edited entry 'The Answer to the Ultimate Question...' (guess what's in there), I'll go for it
A665958 - Aircraft Spotting -- Spotted!
Monsignore Pizzafunghi Bosselese Posted Feb 21, 2002
Congratulations!
This entry can be spotted on the ComingUp page because it's on it's way into the Edited Guide now . In brief, you'll have to wait another couple of weeks before it'll gently land on the frontpage becuase there'll be some fine tuning from a SubEd plus another one from the in-house team. However, the course is set!
(
for the pilots!)
Bossel
Key: Complain about this post
Peer Review: A665958 - Aircraft Spotting
- 1: sidsaucer (Jan 29, 2002)
- 2: Felonious Monk - h2g2s very own Bogeyman (Feb 2, 2002)
- 3: Spelugx the Beige, Wizard, Perl, Thaumatologically Challenged (Feb 10, 2002)
- 4: Silverfish (Feb 13, 2002)
- 5: Spelugx the Beige, Wizard, Perl, Thaumatologically Challenged (Feb 15, 2002)
- 6: sidsaucer (Feb 16, 2002)
- 7: Cloviscat (Feb 20, 2002)
- 8: Galen (Feb 20, 2002)
- 9: Monsignore Pizzafunghi Bosselese (Feb 20, 2002)
- 10: Monsignore Pizzafunghi Bosselese (Feb 21, 2002)
More Conversations for Aircraft Spotting
Write an Entry
"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is a wholly remarkable book. It has been compiled and recompiled many times and under many different editorships. It contains contributions from countless numbers of travellers and researchers."