A Conversation for Arguments For and Against The Existance of this Article
Peer Review: A649640 - Arguments For and Against The Existance of this Article
OgreJedi Started conversation Aug 12, 2002
Entry: Arguments For and Against The Existance of this Article - A649640
Author: HippieOgre - U178674
I have written an excellent article, A649640 - 'Arguments For and Against The Existance of this Article', and feel it should be submitted. Any arguments? Gah, well, say what you want. I'm not serious, but it would be rather funny.
A649640 - Arguments For and Against The Existance of this Article
Researcher 177704 Posted Aug 12, 2002
A649640 - Arguments For and Against The Existance of this Article
Kate Schechter (Back on the right side of the pond) Posted Aug 12, 2002
*blinks*
I don't get it... is it just me?
A649640 - Arguments For and Against The Existance of this Article
Noggin the Nog Posted Aug 12, 2002
A649640 - Arguments For and Against The Existance of this Article
caper_plip Posted Aug 12, 2002
Well, seeing that this is exactly the same as the Help Page A467147, could this be removed from Peer Review as it does not fit the Writing-Guidelines?
Caper Plip
A649640 - Arguments For and Against The Existance of this Article
Researcher 177704 Posted Aug 12, 2002
I'm kind of disappointed. An article that actually addressed the philosphical question of 'Arguments For and Against The Existance of this Article' would have been really interesting.
A649640 - Arguments For and Against The Existance of this Article
Otto Fisch ("Stop analysing Strava.... and cut your hedge") Posted Aug 12, 2002
Hi HippieOgre!
I think this is funny! Problem is, as people have said, it doesn't meet the writing guidelines for the *edited* section of the guide. The edited section of the guide is a kind of peer-reviewed online encyclopaedia, so entries have to be facutal and written in a certain style. That's not to say that there's anything wrong with what you've written - just that it's not for review in this particular forum.
Could you click on the peer review link at the top of the page, and then click on "remove" to take this out of peer review? This *won't* delete your entry, but will just take it from this review list. You could put this in the alternative writing workshop, or put a link from your home page - "click here to be confused"
Best wishes
Otto
A649640 - Arguments For and Against The Existance of this Article
Monsignore Pizzafunghi Bosselese Posted Aug 12, 2002
well, yes, nice attempt alluding to the deeper meaning of existance... but somehow misfired, I'm afraid. PR and British humour are two different things
A649640 - Arguments For and Against The Existance of this Article
Zarquon's Singing Fish! Posted Aug 13, 2002
Not sure what's going on here. Has the author deleted the entry, or was it always thus (and therefore justifying the title)?
Whatever, it looks to me like a GR case.
A649640 - Arguments For and Against The Existance of this Article
OgreJedi Posted Aug 14, 2002
you're all no fun. it was intended as a joke to begin with, and wasn't expected to be put into peer review. i WAS going to actually write a philosophical article on it (which would actually be very stupid and just involve all the metaphysical questions that could be addressed for anything else and get mankind absolutely nowhere), but then realized that it'd be funnier this way and would confuse a lot of people. my mission succeeded...
anyway, it's not necessarily british humor, just philosophical geek humor. not every british person understands metaphysics enough to find it hilarious.
Key: Complain about this post
Peer Review: A649640 - Arguments For and Against The Existance of this Article
- 1: OgreJedi (Aug 12, 2002)
- 2: Researcher 177704 (Aug 12, 2002)
- 3: Kate Schechter (Back on the right side of the pond) (Aug 12, 2002)
- 4: Noggin the Nog (Aug 12, 2002)
- 5: caper_plip (Aug 12, 2002)
- 6: Researcher 177704 (Aug 12, 2002)
- 7: Otto Fisch ("Stop analysing Strava.... and cut your hedge") (Aug 12, 2002)
- 8: Monsignore Pizzafunghi Bosselese (Aug 12, 2002)
- 9: Zarquon's Singing Fish! (Aug 13, 2002)
- 10: OgreJedi (Aug 14, 2002)
More Conversations for Arguments For and Against The Existance of this Article
Write an Entry
"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is a wholly remarkable book. It has been compiled and recompiled many times and under many different editorships. It contains contributions from countless numbers of travellers and researchers."