A Conversation for Snuggle Bunnies
A580961-Snuggle Bunnies
unremarkable: Lurker, OMFC, LPAS Posted Jun 22, 2001
this is a great entry...
a couple of grammatical type things i noticed:
*"One of the only games where players with a little extra padding is a good thing (i.e. a little softer rounder bunny).": this should read "where players with a little extra padding ARE a good thing" its a subject-verb agreement thing....
*"The two bunnies comfort." should be "bunnies'" its plural there...
again, this is a wonderful entry, i'm sure someone else will be along shortly to let you know some other points of view....
well done!
A580961-Snuggle Bunnies
tacsatduck- beware the <sheep> lie Posted Jun 22, 2001
Thank you for your comments. I do believe you are right about the 'is' being changed to an 'are'. I am not sure about bunnies. I do believe it should be "The two bunny's comfort." Again thank you for the comments.
A580961-Snuggle Bunnies
kabads Posted Jun 22, 2001
I like this, although I'm not a regular player. Just what does a love seat look like?
Unfortunately, I think it might not be suitable for the guide, as it seems to be a work of fiction - at least for the most of us.
Before writing an entry that you want edited, you might want to look at http://www.bbc.co.uk/h2g2/guide/Writing-Guidelines (if you haven't already)
A580961-Snuggle Bunnies
tacsatduck- beware the <sheep> lie Posted Jun 22, 2001
A love seat is a cross between a couch and a chair. A chair usualy has one cusion for you to sit on. A couch usualy has three. A love seat has two.
This was not meant to be a work of fiction, but is actualy a very real thing.
A580961-Snuggle Bunnies
kabads Posted Jun 22, 2001
Like I said, I think it might not be suitable to be an edited entry - but lets get the opinion of other scouts - hey, that's the beauty of this system.
A580961-Snuggle Bunnies
C Hawke Posted Jun 23, 2001
Alas I tend to agree, great enrty but maybe not what the guide is after.
We shall see what TPTB say.
ChawkE - Scout
A580961-Snuggle Bunnies
C Hawke Posted Jun 23, 2001
The powers That Be
ie Ashley at the moment.
Must go - need food and want to try and make a Snuggle Bunny later today, so need energy
ChawkE
A580961-Snuggle Bunnies
Monsignore Pizzafunghi Bosselese Posted Jun 23, 2001
I've been told elsewhere that I've got a warped sense of what should go in the Guide and what not but... I don't see why this one should be
rejected ?!
'Learning how to fly with Meditation' was kind of the same genre, and made it.
As to the main point: IMHO the Snuggle Bunny is a real thing, and hence no fiction. What if there was a latin name for it (compare with 'cunnilingus') ?
Let's see what Rome, err... the PTB have to say on that
Bossel (Scout)
A580961-Snuggle Bunnies
Kenrick Posted Jun 23, 2001
I agree with Bossel.
It is not fictional and describes a real activity so therefore should stay.
By the way, what does IMHO mean, Bossel?
(Yes, I'm ignorant )
A580961-Snuggle Bunnies
C Hawke Posted Jun 25, 2001
Well in the HO of TPTB Snuggle Bunnies, whilst being a bit sickly is a valid potential entry, all you need to do now is find a soppy enough Scout to recommend it
ChawkE
A580961-Snuggle Bunnies
tacsatduck- beware the <sheep> lie Posted Jun 25, 2001
Well at least I have not been totally rejected. I see that my article has been called sickly though. How exactly do you mean that ChawkE? Is it something that I might be able to fix or does it have to do more with the subject?
A580961-Snuggle Bunnies
C Hawke Posted Jun 25, 2001
Sickly!? No, not my opinion at all, just sort of quoteing what one of the PTB said, it would be wrong of me to say which one I believe I refered to it as "cute"
No it was IMHO a bit borderline, any "bitterness" stems from the rejection some time ago (before) PR came in, of my excellent entry on Quantum Life Momennts (http://www.bbc.co.uk/h2g2/guide/A186248) because it was viewed as a joke
ChawkE
A580961-Snuggle Bunnies
tacsatduck- beware the <sheep> lie Posted Jun 25, 2001
http://www.bbc.co.uk/h2g2/guide/A186248 I think this is the link you tried to put up before ChawkE
A580961-Snuggle Bunnies
unremarkable: Lurker, OMFC, LPAS Posted Jun 25, 2001
hmmm, i can see where you're coming from with that... maybee try resubmitting? (although, if the TPTB smacked it down the first time, they may do so again.) imho its a pretty decent entry, but hey, I'm just a researcher...
A580961-Snuggle Bunnies
C Hawke Posted Jun 25, 2001
Opps ta Tacsatduck, bit of mouse aim problem when cutting and pasting.
No, I'll not put it up, but anyone can put anything foward in PR, even if it isn't theirs
ChawkE
Key: Complain about this post
A580961-Snuggle Bunnies
- 1: tacsatduck- beware the <sheep> lie (Jun 22, 2001)
- 2: unremarkable: Lurker, OMFC, LPAS (Jun 22, 2001)
- 3: tacsatduck- beware the <sheep> lie (Jun 22, 2001)
- 4: kabads (Jun 22, 2001)
- 5: tacsatduck- beware the <sheep> lie (Jun 22, 2001)
- 6: kabads (Jun 22, 2001)
- 7: C Hawke (Jun 23, 2001)
- 8: kabads (Jun 23, 2001)
- 9: C Hawke (Jun 23, 2001)
- 10: Monsignore Pizzafunghi Bosselese (Jun 23, 2001)
- 11: Kenrick (Jun 23, 2001)
- 12: Monsignore Pizzafunghi Bosselese (Jun 23, 2001)
- 13: Kenrick (Jun 23, 2001)
- 14: C Hawke (Jun 25, 2001)
- 15: tacsatduck- beware the <sheep> lie (Jun 25, 2001)
- 16: unremarkable: Lurker, OMFC, LPAS (Jun 25, 2001)
- 17: C Hawke (Jun 25, 2001)
- 18: tacsatduck- beware the <sheep> lie (Jun 25, 2001)
- 19: unremarkable: Lurker, OMFC, LPAS (Jun 25, 2001)
- 20: C Hawke (Jun 25, 2001)
More Conversations for Snuggle Bunnies
Write an Entry
"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is a wholly remarkable book. It has been compiled and recompiled many times and under many different editorships. It contains contributions from countless numbers of travellers and researchers."