h2g2 The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy: Earth Edition

Entry: I praise of co-dependency - A5367152
Author: mutard - U752441

The myth of co-dependency investigated

hi,

should the title me In praise of .... rather than I praise of ??

tjm

And more to the point, are you sure that Peer Review is really where you're going to want to be with this entry?

Peer Review is for entries going into the Edited Guide -- which means that they all need to be grounded in facts and reality. This entry, on the other hand, seems to be pretty much all personal opinion, personal theories, personal philosophies. While I supposed it would be theoretically possible to write an entry on the merits of codependency which met the Writing-Guidelines, I think it would end up looking quite different than this one.

That said, if the Edited Guide is still really where you want to go with this, and you're willing to make some pretty substantial changes, we'll be willing to give you plenty of suggestions. But if you'd rather keep it in the style it has now, I'd suggest perhaps submitting the entry to the Alternative Writing Workshop instead.


Mikey

Personally, I would keep the text in the same style, and move it to the AWW, as I thought it was a very interesting piece of work. Thanks for posting it.



sprout

agrees, - reminds himself to stop late night scouting

should be IN not I........

I would appreciate any suggestions to improve the piece

with respect, this is not the place for people to help improve your article,

if you could go to the peer review forum, find your thread in the list and click remove, then re submit it to the AWW (alt writing workshop), people there will be more than welcome to help you there

cheers

tjm

back to the entry?

Yes please.

defo