A Conversation for Formula 1: World Champions

Peer Review: A535808 - Formula 1: World Champions

Post 1

Lentilla (Keeper of Non-Sequiturs)

Entry: Formula 1: World Champions - A535808
Author: Eric L. Fleming - U158159

This is part of a series on Formula One Racing. Any suggested changes will have to be made by the sub-ed.


A535808 - Formula 1: World Champions

Post 2

Ukkeli, Keeper of Article Free English

I'm no sub-ed, but I still suggest that somebody would check spelling of Mika Hakkinen's homecountry.

smiley - snowman


A535808 - Formula 1: World Champions

Post 3

There is only one thing worse than being Gosho, and that is not being Gosho

As an entry it's a bit thin - it's almost entirely made up of three tables smiley - erm

An explanation of how the points are awarded would be a good addition I think smiley - smiley


A535808 - Formula 1: World Champions

Post 4

Dr Hell

It's the same comment as in the other stats-only Entries. They do not stand alone. It lacks contents. And a brief intro, like "what is F1 in the first place?"

HELL


A535808 - Formula 1: World Champions

Post 5

Bluebottle

A good start, but yes, you do, I feel, need to put a bit more flesh on the bones of the table. Tables seem a bit dry on their own, so more text to explain their significance, along with dates would be a help.
Also, when you write a series of connected articles, you might want to consider posting them to the University, so check out <./>University-Recruit</.>

<BB<


A535808 - Formula 1: World Champions

Post 6

Tango

You also might want to use tags instead of *'s. Formula 1 is a big topic, it needs more than just stats.

Tango


A535808 - Formula 1: World Champions

Post 7

HanSolo

The title is a bit confusing: reading it first I thought there would be an article about the Champions, how they won, more details,...


A535808 - Formula 1: World Champions

Post 8

There is only one thing worse than being Gosho, and that is not being Gosho

"Any suggested changes will have to be made by the sub-ed."

I don't think Sub-eds should be expected to write entire sections in order flesh out an entry such as this and the others rescued from the Formula One uni project smiley - erm

You know that you can do that yourself don't you Lentilla? Just go here http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/classic/test535808, copy'n'paste the text into a new entry of your own, and work on it from there smiley - smiley


A535808 - Formula 1: World Champions

Post 9

Dr Hell

Just as a note: This Entry has been salvaged from UNI. So, it's probably not going back there, is it?

HELL


Congratulations - Your Entry has been Picked for the Edited Guide!

Post 10

h2g2 auto-messages

Your Guide Entry has just been picked from Peer Review by one of our Scouts, and is now heading off into the Editorial Process, which ends with publication in the Edited Guide. We've therefore moved this Review Conversation out of Peer Review and to the entry itself.

If you'd like to know what happens now, check out the page on 'What Happens after your Entry has been Recommended?' at EditedGuide-Process. We hope this explains everything.

Thanks for contributing to the Edited Guide!


Key: Complain about this post

Write an Entry

"The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is a wholly remarkable book. It has been compiled and recompiled many times and under many different editorships. It contains contributions from countless numbers of travellers and researchers."

Write an entry
Read more